From strategy to action: The development and implementation of problem-oriented projects

Crime Reduction and Problem-Oriented Policing

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 89-125

  Bullock, Karen ^a   Tilley, Nick ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^b NOTTINGHAM TRENT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925817810     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781843924357     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. Blagg, H., Pearson, G., Sampson, A., Smith, D. and Stubbs, P. (1988) ‘Interagency co-operation: reality and rhetoric’, in T. Hope and M. Shaw (eds) Communities and Crime Reduction. London: HMSO.
2. Braga, A., Kennedy, D. and Piehl, A. (1999) ‘Problem-oriented policing and youth violence: an evaluation of the Boston Gun Project’. Unpublished report to the National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC.
3. Bullock, K., Farrell, G. and Tilley, N. (2002) Funding and Implementing Crime Reduction Initiatives. Online Only Report 10/02. London: Home Office.
4. Bullock, K. and Tilley, N. (2002) Gangs, Shootings and Violent Incidents in Manchester: Developing a Crime Reduction Strategy. Crime Reduction Research Series 13. London: Home Office.
5. Ekblom, P. (1995) ‘Safer Cities programme phase 1: informal process evaluation’. Unpublished report, Home Office Research and Statistics Department.
6. Ekblom, P. (2002) ‘From the source to the mainstream is uphill: the challenge of transferring knowledge of crime prevention through replication, innovation and anticipation’, in N. Tilley (ed.) Analysis for Crime Prevention. Crime Prevention Studies 13. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press/Cullompton, UK: Willan.
7. Foster, J. and Hope, T. (1993) Housing, Community and Crime: The Impact of the Priority Estates Project. Home Office Research Study 131. London: HMSO.
8. Goldstein, H. (1990) Problem-oriented Policing. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
9. Hope, T. and Murphy, J. (1983) ‘Problems of implementing crime prevention: the experience of a Crime Reduction project’, The Howard Journal, XXII: 38–50.
10. Irving, B. and Dixon, J. (2003) Hotspotting. London: The Police Foundation.
11. Kennedy, D. (1997) ‘Pulling levers: chronic offenders, high crime settings and a theory of prevention’, Valparaiso University Law Review, 31: 449–484.
12. Liddle, M. and Gelsthorpe, L. (1994) Interagency Crime Prevention: Organising Local Delivery. Crime Prevention and Detection Unit Paper 52. London: Home Office.
13. Pearson, G., Blagg, H., Smith, D., Sampson, A. and Stubbs, P. (1992) ‘Crime, community and conflict: the multi-agency approach’, in D. Downes (ed.) Unravelling Criminal Justice. London: Macmillan.
14. Read, T. and Tilley, N. (2000) Not Rocket Science? Crime Reduction Research Series 6. London: Home Office.
15. Sampson, A., Stubbs, P., Smith, D., Pearson, G. and Blagg, H. (1988) ‘Crime, localities and the multi-agency approach’. British Journal of Criminology, 28: 478–493.
16. Scarman, Lord (1981) The Brixton Disorders, 10–12 April 1981 (cmnd 8427). London: HMSO.
17. Sutton, M. (1996) Implementing Crime Prevention Schemes in a Multi-agency Setting: Aspects of Process in the Safer Cities Programme. Home Office Research Study 160. London: Home Office.