“I Thought I Was a Professional”: Teachers’ and Parents’ Reactions to NCLB in New York City

What is Authentic Educational Reform?: Pushing Against the Compassionate Conservative Agenda

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 105-120

  Baghban, Marcia ^a   Li, Harriet ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925816134     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315084091-10     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Archer, J. (2005, August 31). Connecticut files court challenge to NCLB. Education Week on-line. Available at http://ewdev.edweek.org.
2. Arenson, K. (2005, February 2). CUNY takes steps to draw better students to teaching. The New York Times, p. B4.
3. Bartlett, R., and von Zastrow, C. (2004, April 7). Commentary: Academic atrophy. Education Week online. Available at http://www.edweek.org.
4. Bomer, K. (2005). Missing the children: When politics and programs impede our teaching. Language Arts, 82, 168-176.
5. Bracey, G.W. (2004, October). The seven deadly absurdities of No Child Left Behind. http://nochildleft.com.
6. Coles, G. (2000). Misreading reading: The bad science that hurts children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
7. Coles, G. (2003). Reading the naked truth: Literacy, legislation, and lies. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
8. Dillon, S. (2005, April 6). Connecticut to sue U.S. over cost of school testing law. The New York Times, pp. B1, B8.
9. Goodnough, A. (2003, January 22). City is converting reading and math to uniform course. The New York Times, p. A1.
10. International Reading Association (2000). Excellent reading teachers. Adopted position statement. The Reading Teacher, 54, 235-240.
11. Kohn, A. (2004, September). Feel-bad education. Education Week on-line. http://www.edweek.org.
12. Lazerson, M. (1987). American education in the twentieth century: A documentary history. New York: Teachers College Press.
13. Li, H. (2004, October 23). But I thought I was a professional. Transcript of opening panel, (2005, August) Queens College, Division of Education Conference.
14. Meier, D., and Wood, G. (Eds.). (2004). Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is damaging our children and our schools. Boston: Beacon Press.
15. Murphy, S. (1998). Fragile evidence: A critique of reading assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. National School Boards Association (2005, August). Legal clips. http://www.nsba.org.
17. No Child Left (2004, October). Research-based delusions. http://nochildleft.com.
18. Novinger, S. (2005). Telling our stories: Speaking truth to power. Language Arts, 82, 195-203.
19. Robinson, R.D., McKenna, M.C., and Wedman, J.M. (2003). Issues and trends in literacy education (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
20. Saulny, S. (2005, April 4). A lucrative brand of tutoring grows unchecked. The New York Times, pp. A1, A18.
21. Smith, F. (2003). Unspeakable acts, unnatural practices: Flaws and fallacies in “scientific” reading instruction. Portsmouth NH: Heinemann.
22. U.S. Department of Education (2004). No Child Left Behind: A toolkit for teachers. Jessup, MD: Education Publications Center.
23. Yero, J.L. (2002). Presuppositions of No Child Left Behind. http://www.TeachersMind.com.