On the origins of latent curve models

Factor Analysis at 100: Historical Developments and Future Directions

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 79-98

  Bollen, Kenneth A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925813997     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203936764     Document Type: Chapter

References (22)

1. Baker, G. A. (1954). Factor analysis of relative growth. Growth, 18, 137-143.
2. Bentler, P. M. (1985). Theory and implementation of EQS: A structural equations program, manual for program version 2. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software, Inc.
3. Boker, S. M. (2001). Differential structural equation modeling of intraindividual variability. In L. M. Collins & A. G. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 5-27). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4. Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. New York: Wiley.
5. Browne, M. W. (1993). Structured latent curve models. In C. M. Cuadras & C. R. Rao (Eds.), Multivariate analysis: Future directions 2 (pp. 171-197). New York: Elsevier Science.
6. Cronbach, L. J. (1967). Year-to-year correlations of mental tests: A review of the Hofstaetter analysis. Child Development, 38, 283-289.
7. Griliches, Z. (1957). Specification bias in estimates of production functions. Journal of Farm Economics, 39, 8-20.
8. Joreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183-202.
9. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1981). LISREL V: Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood. Chicago: National Educational Resources.
10. McArdle, J. J. (1988). Dynamic but structural equation modeling of repeated measures data. In J. R. Nesselroade & R. B. Cattell (Eds.), The handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (2nd ed., pp. 561-614). New York: Plenum.
11. McArdle, J. J. (2001). A latent difference score approach to longitudinal dynamic structural analyses. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sorbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future (pp. 342-380). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
12. Meredith, W., & Tisak, J. (1984). On “Tuckerizing” curves. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Santa Barbara, CA.
13. Meredith, W., & Tisak, J. (1990). Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika, 55(1), 107-122.
14. Pearl, R. (1924). Studies in human biology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkens Co.
15. Rao, C. R. (1958). Some statistical methods for comparison of growth curves. Biometrika, 51, 83-90.
16. Reed, L. J. (1921). On the correlation between any two functions and its application to the general case of spurious correlation. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 11, 449-455.
17. Rogosa, D., Brandt, D., & Zimowski, M. (1982). A growth curve approach to the measurement of change. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 726-748.
18. Thurstone, L. L. (1937). Psychology as a quantitative rational science. Science, 85, 227-232.
19. Tucker, L. R. (1958). Determination of parameters of a functional relation by factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 19-23.
20. Tucker, L. R. (1966). Learning theory and multivariate experiment: Illustration by determination of generalized learning curves. In R. B. Cattell (Ed.), Handbook of multivariate psychology (pp. 476-501). Chicago: Rand McNally.
21. Wishart, J. (1938). Growth-rate determinations in nutrition studies with the bacon pig, and their analysis. Biometrika, 30 (1/2), 16-28.
22. Young, C. H., Savola, K. L., & Phelps, E. (Eds.). (1991). Inventory of longitudinal studies in the social sciences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.