A comparative study of survival after minimally invasive and open oesophagectomy

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 431-437

  Burdall, Oliver C ^a   Boddy, Alexander P ^b   Fullick, James ^c   Blazeby, Jane ^a   Krysztopik, Richard ^a   Streets, Christopher ^a   Hollowood, Andrew ^a   Barham, Christopher P ^a   Titcomb, Dan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BRISTOL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

General oesophageal; Oesophageal; Surgical; Thoracoscopy

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CANCER SURVIVAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ESOPHAGUS CANCER; ESOPHAGUS RESECTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPEN OESOPHAGECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; THORACOSCOPY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROCEDURES; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; THORACOTOMY; TRENDS; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; AGED; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; ESOPHAGECTOMY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GREAT BRITAIN; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; THORACOTOMY;

EID: 84925789160     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3694-4     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90
2. Parkin DM, Pisani P, Ferlay J (1999) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 49:33–64
3. Netherlands Cancer Registry (2008) Incidentiecijfers oesofaguscarcinomen. Integrale Kankercentra, pp 9–26 [http://www.ikcnet.nl/]
4. Boscetti C, Levi F, Ferley J et al (2008) Trends in oesophageal cancer incidence and mortality in Europe. Int J Cancer 122:1118–1129
5. Wu P, Posner M (2003) The role of surgery in the management of oesophageal cancer. Lancet Oncol 4:481–488
6. Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ (2003) Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 349:2241–2252
7. Biere SSAY, MIvB Henegouwen, Maas KW et al (2012) Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 379:1887–1892
8. Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO et al (2003) Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy—Outcomes in 222 Patients. Ann Surg 238:486–495
9. Bailey SH, Bull DA, Harpole DH et al (2003) Outcomes after esophagectomy: a ten-year prospective cohort. Ann Thorac Surg 75:217–222
10. Hulscher JBF, van Sandwick JW, de Boer AG et al (2002) Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 347:1662–1669
11. Berrisford RG, Wajed SA, Sanders D et al (2008) Short-term outcomes following total minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 95(5):602–610
12. Maas KW, Biere SS, van Hoogstraten IM et al (2014) Immunological changes after minimally invasive or conventional esophageal resection for cancer: a randomized trial. World J Surg 38(1):131–137
13. Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S (1992) Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R Coll Surg Edinb 37:7–11
14. Smithers B, Gotley DC, Martin I et al (2007) Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg 245:232–240
15. Law S (2012) Is minimally invasive preferable to open oesophaegctomy? Lancet 379(9829):1856–1858
16. A randomised controlled trial comparing standard chemotherapy followed by resection versus ECX chemotherapy followed by resection in patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus. ISRCTN: 01852072
17. Blazeby JM, Blencowe NS, Titcomb DR et al (2011) Demonstration of the IDEAL recommendations for evaluating and reporting surgical innovation in minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 98:544–551
18. Medical Research Council Oesophageal Cancer Working Group (2002) Surgical resection with or without preoperative chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359(9319):1727–1733
19. Lewis I (1946) The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus with special reference to a new operation for growths of the middle third. Br J Surg 34:18–31
20. Kim T, Hochwald SN, Sarosi GA et al (2012) Review of minimally invasive esophagectomy and current controversies. Gastroenterol Res Pract. doi:10.1155/2012/683213
21. Verhage RJ, Hazebroek EJ, Boone J et al (2009) Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Chir 64(2):135–146
22. Biere SS, Maas KW, Bonvina L et al (2011) Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multi-centre, randomized trial (TIME-trial). BMC Surg. 12(11):2
23. Dantoc MM, Cox MR, Eslick GD (2012) Does minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 16(3):486–494
24. NIH—Surveillance epidemiology and end results. SEER stat fact sheets: esophagus. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/esoph.html. Accessed 04/03/2014
25. Mallipeddi MK, Onaitis MW (2014) The contemporary role of minimally invasive esophagectomies in esophageal cancer. Curr Onco Rep 16:374
26. Avery KN, Barham CP, Berrisford R et al (2013) Understanding surgical interventions in RCTs: the need for better methodology. Lancet 381(9860):27–28