Community service as reintegration: Exploring the potential

What Matters in Probation

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 229-254

  Gelsthorpe, Loraine ^a   Rex, Sue ^a  

^a PEMBROKE COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925789050     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781843924920     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Advisory Council on the Penal System (1970) Non-custodial and Semi-custodial Penalities (the Wootton Report). London: HMSO.
2. Bandura, A. (1997) Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: Freeman & Co.
3. Barker, M. (1993) Community Service and Women Offenders. London: Association of Chief Officers of Probation.
4. Bottoms, A.E. (1987) ‘Limiting prison use in England and Wales’, Howard Journal, 26: 177–202.
5. Bottoms, A.E., Gelsthorpe, L. and Rex, S. (eds) Community Penalties: Change and Challenges. Cullompton: Willan.
6. Chesney-Lind, M. (ed.) (1997) Girls, Women and Crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Cook, D. (1997) Poverty, Crime and Punishment. London: Child Poverty Action Group.
8. Dowden, C. and Andrews, D. (1999) ‘What Works for female offenders’, Crime and Delinquency, 45 (4): 438–52.
9. Eaton, M. (1993) Women after Prison. Buckingham: Open University Press.
10. Gaes, G., Flanagan, T., Motiuk, L. and Stewart, L. (1999) ‘Adult correctional treatment’, in M. Tonry and J. Petersilia (eds) Prisons. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11. Gelsthorpe, L. (2001) ‘Accountability: difference and diversity in the delivery of community penalties’, in A.E. Bottoms et al. (eds) Community Penalties: Change and Challenges. Cullompton: Willan.
12. Gelsthorpe, L. (2003) ‘Female offending: a theoretical overview’, in G. McIvor (ed.) Women Who Offend: Research Highlights in Social Work 44. London: Jessica Kingsley.
13. Gelsthorpe, L. and Loucks, N. (1997) ‘Magistrates’ views of the sentencing of women’, in C. Hedderman and L. Gelsthorpe (eds) Understanding the Sentencing of Women. Home Office Research Study 170. London: Home Office.
14. Gelsthorpe, L. and Morris, A. (2002) ‘Women and imprisonment in England and Wales: a penal paradox’, Criminal Justice, 2 (3): 277–301.
15. Goodwin, K. and McIvor, G. (2001) Women’s Experiences of Community Service Orders. Stirling: University of Stirling Social Work Research Centre.
16. Haines, K. (1990) After-care Services for Released Prisoners: A Review of the Literature. Cambridge: Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge.
17. Hedderman, C. and Gelsthorpe, L. (eds) (1997) Understanding the Sentencing of Women. Home Office Research Study 170. London: Home Office.
18. Hine, J. (1993) ‘Access for women: flexible and friendly?’, in D. Whitfield and D. Scott (eds) Paying Back: Twenty Years of Community Service. Winchester: Waterside Press.
19. Home Office (2002a) Criminal Statistics in England and Wales 2001. London: HMSO.
20. Home Office (2002b) Probation Statistics England and Wales 2001. London: Home Office.
21. Home Office Inspectorate of Probation (1991) Report on Women Offenders and Probation Service Provision. Report of a Thematic Inspection. London: Home Office Inspectorate of Probation.
22. Home Office Inspectorate of Probation (1996) A Review of Probation Service Provision for Women Offenders. Report of a Thematic Inspection. London: Home Office Inspectorate of Probation.
23. Howard League (1999) ‘Do women paint fences too? Women’s experience of community service’ (briefing paper). London: Howard League for Penal Reform.
24. Howden-Windell, J. and Clark, D. (1999) ‘The criminogenic needs of women. A literature review’ (unpublished paper). London: HM Prison Service.
25. Killias, A. and Ribeaud, D. (2000) ‘Does community service rehabilitate better than short-term imprisonment? Results of a controlled experiment’, Howard Journal, 39 (1): 40–57.
26. Lloyd, C., Mair, G. and Hough, M. (1995) Explaining Reconviction Rates: A Critical Analysis. Home Office Research Study 136. London: Home Office.
27. Mair, G. (1997) ‘Community penalties and the probation service’, in M. Maguire et al. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (2nd edn). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
28. Mair, G. and May, C. (1997) Offenders on Probation. Home Office Research Study 167. London: HMSO.
29. May, C. (1999) Explaining Reconviction Rates Following a Community Sentence: The Role of Social Factors. Home Office Research Study 192. London: Home Office.
30. McGuire, J. (ed.) (1995) What Works? Reducing Reoffending – Guidelines for Research and Practice. Chichester: Wiley.
31. McGuire, J. (ed.) What Works? Reducing Reoffending. Guidelines for Research and Practice. Chichester: Wiley.
32. McIvor, G. (1990) Sanctions for Serious or Persistent Offenders: A Review of the Literature. Stirling: Social Work Research Centre, University of Stirling.
33. McIvor, G. (1992) Sentenced to Serve. Aldershot: Avebury.
34. McIvor, G. (1998a) ‘Pro-social modeling and legitimacy: lessons from a study of community service’, in S. Rex and A. Matravers (eds) Pro-social Modelling and Legitimacy (the Clarke Hall Day Conference). Cambridge: Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge.
35. McIvor, G. (1998b) ‘Jobs for the boys? Gender differences in referral to community service’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 37 (3): 280–290.
36. McIvor, G. (2002) ‘What works with women on probation? Key findings from research with women on probation in Scotland.’ Paper presented to the British Society of Criminology Conference, Keele, July.
37. Morgan, R. (2003) ‘Thinking about the demand for probation services’, Probation Journal, 50 (1): 7–19.
38. Palmer, E. and Hollin, C. (1995) A Literature Review: The Effectiveness of Vocational and Educational Training in Reducing Recidivism. Report to the Prison Service Agency. Leicester: Leicester University Department of Psychology.
39. Pollack, S. (2000) ‘Reconceptualising women’s agency and empowerment: challenges to self-esteem discourse and women’s lawbreaking’, Women and Criminal Justice, 12 (1): 75–89.
40. Prison Reform Trust (2000) Justice for Women: The Need for Reform. The Report of the Committee on Women’s Imprisonment. London: Prison Reform Trust.
41. Raynor, P. and Vanstone, M. (1997) Straight Thinking on Probation (STOP): The Mid Glamorgan Experiment. Probation Studies Unit Report 4. Oxford: University of Oxford Centre for Criminological Research.
42. Rex, S. (1998) ‘Community Penalties in England and Wales 1967–1998’, Overcrowded Times, 9, 6, 1: 16–20.
43. Rex, S. (2001) ‘Beyond cognitive-behaviouration? Reflections on the effectiveness literature’, in A.E. Bottoms, L. Gelsthorpe and S. Rex (eds) Community Penalties: Change and Challenges. Cullompton: Willan.
44. Rex, S. and Gelsthorpe, L. (2002) ‘The role of Community Service in Reducing Offending: Evaluating Pathfinder Projects in the UK’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 41 (4): 311–325.
45. Rumgay, J. (1996) ‘Women offenders: towards a needs based policy’, Vista, September: 104–115.
46. Sampson, R. and Laub, J. (1993) Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points through Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Sarno, C., Hearnden, I. and Hedderman, C. (2001) Working their Way out of Offending. An Evaluation of Two Probation Schemes. Home Office Research Study 218. London: Home Office.
48. Trotter, C. (1993) The Supervision of Offenders. What Works?. Sydney: Victorian Office of Corrections.
49. Zaplin, R. (ed.) (1998) Female Offenders: Critical Perspectives and Effective Interventions. Baltimore, MD: Aspen.