Speech perception and auditory impairment: The roles of temporal and spectral information

Listening to Speech: An Auditory Perspective

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 315-329

  Rosen, Stuart ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925781292     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203933107     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. Ainsworth, W. A. (1986). Visual presentation of voicing and other cues as an aid to lipreading. In R. Lawrence (Ed.), Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics: Speech and Hearing(pp. 233–248). Edinburgh: The Institute of Acoustics.
2. Bishop, D. V. M., Carlyon, R. P., Deeks, J. M., & Bishop, S. J. (1999). Auditory temporal processing impairment: Neither necessary nor sufficient for causing language impairment in children. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 42, 1295–1310.
3. Blesser, B. (1972). Speech perception under conditions of spectral transformation: I. Phonetic characteristics. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 15, 5–41.
4. Bosman, A. J., & Smoorenburg, G. F. (1997a). Evaluation of three pitch tracking algorithms at several signal-to-noise ratios. Acta Acustica, 83, 567–571.
5. Bosman, A. J., & Smoorenburg, G. F. (1997b). Speech reading supplemented with auditorily presented speech elements in the profoundly hearing impaired. Audiology, 36, 29–45.
6. Breeuwer, M., & Plomp, R. (1986). Speech reading supplemented with auditorily presented speech parameters. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 79, 481–499.
7. Buss, E., Hall, J. W., Grose, J. H., & Dev, M. B. (1999). Development of adult-like performance in backward, simultaneous, and forward masking. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 42, 844–849.
8. DeFilippo, C. L., & Scott, B. L. (1978). A method for training and evaluation of the reception of on-going speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63, 1186–1192.
9. Dorman, M. F., Loizou, P. C, & Rainey, D. (1997a). Simulating the effect of cochlear-implant electrode insertion depth on speech understanding. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 2993–2996.
10. Dorman, M. F., Loizou, P. C, & Rainey, D. (1997b). Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 2403–2411.
11. Dorman, M. F., Soli, S., Dankowski, K., Smith, L. M, McCandless, G., & Parkin, J. (1988). Acoustic cues for consonant identification by patients who use the Ineraid cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 2074–2079.
12. Drullman, R., & Smoorenburg, G. F. (1997). Audio-visual perception of compressed speech by profoundly hearing-impaired subjects. Audiology, 36, 165–177
13. Duchnowski, P., Lum, D. S., Krause, J. C, Sexton, M. G., Bratakos, M. S., & Braida, L. D. (2000). Development of speechreading supplements based on automatic speech recognition. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 47, 487–496.
14. Faulkner, A., Ball, V., Rosen, S., Moore, B. C. J., & Fourcin, A. J. (1992). Speech pattern hearing aids for the profoundly hearing-impaired: Speech perception and auditory abilities. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 2136–2155.
15. Faulkner, A., & Rosen, S. (1999). Contributions of temporal encodings of voicing, voicelessness, fundamental frequency and amplitude variation in audio-visual and auditory speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2063–2073.
16. Faulkner, A., Rosen, S., & Moore, B. C. J. (1990). Residual frequency selectivity in the profoundly hearing impaired listener. British Journal of Audiology, 24, 381–392.
17. Faulkner, A., Rosen, S., & Stanton, D. (2003). Simulations of tonotopically-mapped speech processors for cochlear implant electrodes varying in insertion depth. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 1073–1080.
18. Faulkner, A., van Son, N., & Beijk, C. (1997). The TIDE project OSCAR. Scandinavian Audiology, 26, 38–44.
19. Faulkner, A., & Wei, J. (1997). Performance of a real-time multi-layer perceptron algorithm for the extraction of voicing and voice fundamental frequency information. Speech, Hearing and Language: Work in Progress, 10, 41–60.
20. Fletcher, H., & Steinberg, J. C. (1930). Articulation testing methods. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1, 1–48.
21. Fourcin, A. J. (1977). English speech patterns with special reference to artificial auditory stimulation In A. R Thornton. (Ed.), A review of artificial auditory stimulation: Medical Research Council working group report(pp. 42–44). Southampton, UK: Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton.
22. French, N. R., & Steinberg, J. C. (1947). Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sound intelligibility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 19, 90–119.
23. Gantz, B. J., Tyler, R. S., Abbas, P., TyeMurray, N., Knutson, J. F., McCabe, B. E, et al. (1988). Evaluation of 5 different cochlear implant designs—Audiologic assessment and predictors of performance. Laryngoscope, 98, 1100–1106.
24. Gatehouse, S. (1992). The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: Evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 1258–1268.
25. Gatehouse, S., & Robinson, K. (1997). Speech tests as measures of auditory processing. In M. Martin (Ed.), Speech audiometry(2nd ed., pp. 74–88). London: Whurr.
26. Grant, K. W., Ardell, L. H., Kuhl, P. K., & Sparks, D. W. (1985). The contribution of fundamental frequency, amplitude envelope and voicing duration cues to speechreading in normal-hearing subjects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77, 671–677.
27. Green, T, Faulkner, A., & Rosen, S. (2002). Spectral and temporal cues to pitch in noise-excited vocoder simulations of continuous-interleaved-sampling cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 2155–2164.
28. Greenwood, D. D. (1990). A cochlear frequency-position function for several species—29 years later. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 2592–2605.
29. Guenther, F. H., Husain, F. T., Cohen, M. A., & Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (1999). Effects of categorization and discrimination training on auditory perceptual space. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2900–2912.
30. Hartley, D. E. H., Wright, B. A., Hogan, S. C, & Moore, D. R. (2000). Age-related improvements in auditory backward and simultaneous masking in 6-to 10-year-old children. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 43, 1402–1415.
31. Hochmair-Desoyer, I. J., Hochmair, E. S., Fischer, R. E., & Burian, K. (1980). Cochlear prostheses in use: Recent speech comprehension results. Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 229, 81–98.
32. Ketten, D. R., Vannier, M. W, Skinner, M. W, Gates, G. A., Wang, G., & Neely, J. G. (1998). In vivo measures of cochlear length and insertion depth of Nucleus cochlear implant electrode arrays. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 107(S175), 1–16.
33. Leek, M. R., & Summers, V. (1996). Reduced frequency selectivity and the preservation of spectral contrast in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 1796–1806.
34. Levitt, H., Bakke, M., Kates, J., Neuman, A., Schwander, T., & Weiss, M. (1993). Signal-processing for hearing impairment. Scandinavian Audiology, 22, 7–19.
35. Locke, S., & Keller, L. (1973). Categorical perception in a non-linguistic mode. Cortex, 9, 355–369.
36. Merzenich, M. M., Jenkins, W. M., Johnston, P., Schreiner, C, Miller, S. L., & Tallal, P. (1996). Temporal processing deficits of language-learning impaired children ameliorated by training. Science, 271, 77–81.
37. Mody, M., Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Brady, S. (1997). Speech perception deficits in poor readers: Auditory processing or phonological coding? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64, 199–231.
38. Moore, B. C. J., & Glasberg, B. R. (1983). Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 74, 750–753.
39. Otto, S. R., Shannon, R. V, Brackmann, D. E., Hitselberger, W. E., Staller, S., & Menapace, C. (1998). The multichannel auditory brain stem implant: Performance in twenty patients. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 118, 291–303.
40. Pavlovic, C. V., Studebaker, G. A., & Sherbecoe, R. L. (1986). An articulation index based procedure for predicting the speech recognition performance of hearing-impaired individuals. Journal of the Acoustical Soci-ety of America, 80, 50–57.
41. Pollack, I. (1969). Periodicity pitch for white noise—Fact or artefact. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 45, 237–238.
42. Robinson, K., & Gatehouse, S. (1995). Changes in intensity discrimination following monaural long-term use of a hearing aid. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1183–1190.
43. Rosen, S. (1992). Temporal information in speech: Acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 367–373.
44. Rosen, S., Faulkner, A., & Smith, D. A. J. (1990). The psychoacoustics of profound hearing impairment. Acta Oto-laryngologica (Stockholm), 469(Suppl.), 16–22.
45. Rosen, S., Faulkner, A., & Wilkinson, L. (1999). Perceptual adaptation by normal listeners to upward shifts of spectral information in speech and its relevance for users of cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 3629–3636.
46. Rosen, S., & Fourcin, A. J. (1986). Frequency selectivity and the perception of speech. In B. C. J. Moore & R. Patterson (Eds.), Frequency selectivity in hearing(pp. 373–487). London: Academic.
47. Rosen. S., Fourcin, A. J., & Moore, B. C. J. (1981). Voice pitch as an aid to lipreading. Nature, 291, 150–152.
48. Rosen, S., & Manganari, E. (2001). Is there a relationship between speech and nonspeech auditory processing in children with dyslexia? Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 44, 720–736.
49. Rosen, S., Moore, B. C. J., & Fourcin, A. (1980, Summer). Lipreading connected discourse with fundamental frequency information. British Society of Audiology Newsletter, pp. 42–43.
50. Shannon, R. V., Zeng, F-G., Kamath, V., Wygonski, J., & Ekelid, M. (1995). Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science, 270, 303–304.
51. Shannon, R. V., Zeng, F.-G., & Wygonski, J. (1998). Speech recognition with altered spectral distribution of envelope cues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 2467–2476.
52. Smoorenburg, G. F (1996). Speech processing hearing aids for the profoundly hearing impaired. In B. Kollmeier (Ed.), Psychoacoustics, speech and hearing aids(pp. 83–93). Singapore: World Scientific.
53. Summerfield, A. Q., & Marshall, D. H. (1995). Cochlear implantation in the UK 1990–1994. London: HMSO Books.
54. Treisman, M., Faulkner, A., Naish, P. L. N., & Rosner, B. S. (1995). Voice-onset time and tone-onset time: The role of criterion-setting mechanisms in categorical perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 334–366.
55. Upton, H. W (1968). Wearable eye-glass speech reading aid. American Annals of the Deaf, 113, 222–229.
56. van Son, N., Bosman, A. J., Lamore, P. J. J., & Smoorenburg, G. F (1993). The perception of complex harmonic patterns by profoundly hearing-impaired listeners. Audiology, 32, 308–327.
57. Van Tasell, D. J., Greenfield, D. G., Logemann, J. J., & Nelson, D. A. (1992). Temporal cues for consonant recognition: Training, talker generalization, and use in the evaluation of cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 1247–1257.
58. Waldstein, R. S., & Boothroyd, A. (1994). Speechreading enhancement using a sinusoidal substitute for voice fundamental frequency. Speech Communication, 14, 303–312.
59. Walliker, J. R., & Howard, I. S. (1990). The implementation of a real time speech fundamental period algorithm using multi-layer perceptrons. Speech Communication, 9, 63–71.
60. Wright, B. A., Lombardino, L. J., King, W M., Puranik, C. S., Leonard, C. M., & Merzenich, M. M. (1997). Deficits in auditory temporal and spectral resolution in language-impaired children. Nature, 387, 176–178.