Individual and family variables associated with disclosure and nondisclosure of child abuse in Israel

Child Sexual Abuse: Disclosure, Delay, and Denial

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 63-76

  Hershhowitz, Irit ^a   Horowitz, Dvora ^b   Lamb, Michael E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

^b DIVISION FOR INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES   (Israel)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925769773     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203936832     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. DiPietro, E.K., Runyan, D. K., & Fredrickson, D. D. (1997). Predictors of disclosure during medical evaluation for suspected sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 6, 133-42.
2. Ghetti, S., Alexander, K. W., & Goodman, G. S. (2002). Legal involvement in child sexual abuse cases consequences and interventions. International Journal of Law and Psy-chiatry, 25, 235-51.
3. Gonzalez, L. S., Waterman, J., Kelly, R., McCord, J., & Oliveri, K. (1993). Children's pat-terns of disclosures and recantations of sexual and ritualistic abuse allegations in psy-chotherapy. Child Abuse & Neglect, 17, 281-89.
4. Gordon, S., & Jaudes, P. K. (1996). Sexual abuse evaluation in the emergency department: Is the history reliable? Child Abuse & Neglect, 20, 315-22.
5. Gries, L. T., Goh, D. S., & Cavanaugh, J. (1996). Factors associated with disclosure during child sexual abuse assessment. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 5, 1-20.
6. Hershkowitz, I., Fisher, S., Lamb, M. E., & Horowitz, D. (in press). Improving credibility as-sessment in child sexual abuse allegations: The role of the NICHD investigative in-terview protocol. Child Abuse and Neglect.
7. Keary, K., & Fitzpatrick, C. (1994). Children's disclosure of sexual abuse during formal in-vestigation. Child Abuse & Neglect, 18, 543-48.
8. Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., & Esplin, P. W. (1999). Forensic interviews of children. In A. Memon & R. Bull (Eds.). Handbook of the psychology of interviewing (pp. 253-77). New York: Wiley.
9. London, K., Bruck, M., Ceci, S. J., & Shuman, D. W. (2005). Disclosure of child sexual abuse: What does the research tell us about the ways that children tell?. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 11, 194-226.
10. Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Esplin, P. W., & Horowitz, D. (2000). Assessing the value of structured protocols for forensic interviews of alleged child abuse victims. Child Abuse & Neglect. 24, 733-52.
11. Pipe, M. E., Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., & Esplin, P. W. (2004). Recent research on children's testimony about experienced and witnessed events. Developmental Review, 24, 440-68.
12. Pipe, M. E., Stewart, H. L., Sternberg, K. J., Lamb, M. E., & Esplin, P. W. (2003, August). Non-disclosures and alleged abuse in forensic interviews. Paper presented to a conference on non-disclosure and delayed disclosure of child sexual abuse, Satra Bruk, Sweden.
13. Poole, D. A., & Lamb, M. E. (1998). Investigative interviews of children: A guide for helping professionals. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14. Poole, D. A., & Lindsay, D. S. (1998). Assessing the accuracy of young children's reports: Lessons from the investigation of child sexual abuse. Preventive Psychology, 1-26.
15. Sorensen, T., & Snow, B. (1991). How children tell: The process of disclosure in child sexual abuse. Child Welfare, 19, 3-17.
16. Sternberg, K. J., Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Esplin, P. W., & Mitchell, S. (2001). Use of a structured investigative protocol enhances young children's responses to free recall prompts in the course of forensic interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 997-1005.
17. Wood, B., Orsak, C., Murphy, M., & Cross, H. J. (1996). Semi-structured child sexual abuse interviews: Interview and child characteristics related to credibility of disclosure. Child Abuse & Neglect, 20, 81-92.