Intensive supervision and surveillance programmes for young offenders: The evidence base so far

What Works in Probation and Youth Justice: Developing Evidence-Based Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 159-179

  Moore, Robin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925769002     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781843924937     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. Allen, R. (1991) ‘Out of jail: the reduction in the use of penal custody for male juveniles 1981–88, The Howard Journal, 30, 30–52.
2. Altschuler, D.M. (1998) ‘Intermediate sanctions and community treatment for serious and violent juvenile offenders’, in R. Loeber and D.P. Farrington (eds), Serious and Violent Juvenile Offenders: Risk Factors and Successful Interventions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Audit Commission (1996) Misspent Youth: Young People and Crime. London: Audit Commission.
4. Baker, K., Jones, S., Roberts, C. and Merrington, S. (2002) Validity and Reliability of ASSET Findings from the first two years of the use of ASSET. Oxford: Probation Studies Unit.
5. Barton, W.H. and Butts, J.A. (1990) ‘Viable options: intensive supervision programs for juvenile delinquents’, Crime and Delinquency, 36, 238–256.
6. Bonta, J., Rooney, J. and Wallace-Capretta, S. (1999) Electronic Monitoring in Canada. Canada: Public Works and Government Services.
7. Bonta, J., Wallace-Capretta, S. and Rooney, J. (2000) ‘A quasi-experimental evaluation of an intensive rehabilitation supervision program’, Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 312–329.
8. Bottoms, A.E. (1995) Intensive Community Supervision for Young Offenders: Outcomes, Process and Cost. Cambridge: Institute of Criminology.
9. Bottoms, A., Brown, P., McWilliams, B., McWilliams, W. and Nellis, M. (1990) Intermediate Treatment and Juvenile Justice. London: HMSO.
10. Brownlee, I.D. (1995) ‘Intensive probation with young adult offenders: a short reconviction study’, British Journal of Criminology, 35, 599–612.
11. Brownlee, I.D. and Joanes, D. (1993) ‘Intensive probation for young adult offenders: evaluating the impact of a non-custodial sentence’, British Journal of Criminology, 33, 216–230.
12. Cavadino, M. and Dignan, J. (2002) The Penal System: An Introduction. London: Sage.
13. Children’s Society (1989) Penal Custody for Juveniles – the Line of Least Resistance. London: Children’s Society.
14. Cohen, S. (1985) Visions of Social Control. Cambridge: Polity Press.
15. Corbett, R.P. and Petersillia, J. (1994) ‘Intensive rehabilitation supervision: the next generation in community corrections?’, Federal Probation, 58, 72–78.
16. Flood-Page, C., Campbell, S., Harrington, V. and Miller, J. (2000) Youth Crime: Findings from the 1998/99 Youth Lifestyles Survey, Home Office Research Study 209. London: Stationery Office.
17. Folkard, M.S., Smith, D.E. and Smith, D.D. (1976) IMPACT Intensive Matched Probation and After-Care Treatment: Volume II. The Results of the Experiment, Home Office Research Study 36. London: HMSO.
18. Folkard, M.S., Fowles, A.J., McWilliams, B.C., McWilliams, W., Smith, D.D., Smith, D.E. and Walmsley, G.R. (1974) IMPACT Intensive Matched Probation and After-Care Treatment: Volume I. The Design of the Probation Experiment and an Interim Evaluation, Home Office Research Study 24. London: HMSO.
19. Fraser, P. (2003) Sheffield Prolific Offender Project: First Evaluation Report. London: NACRO.
20. Gendreau, P., Goggin, C. and Fulton, B. (2000) ‘Intensive supervision in probation and parole settings’, in C.R. Hollin (ed.), Handbook of Offender Assessment and Treatment. Chichester: Wiley.
21. Giblin, M.J. (2002) ‘Using police officers to enhance the supervision of juvenile probationers: an evaluation of the anchorage CAN program’, Crime and Delinquency, 48, 116–137.
22. Goodstein, L. and Sontheimer, H. (1997) ‘The implementation of an intensive aftercare program for serious juvenile offenders’, Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 352–359.
23. Graham, J. and Bowling, B. (1995) Young People and Crime, Home Office Research Study 145. London: HMSO.
24. Hagell, A. and Newburn, T. (1994) ‘Persistent young offenders and persistent old myths’, Policy Studies, 15, 51–59.
25. Hill, D. (1992) Intensive Probation Practice: An Option for the 1990s. Norwich: Social Work Monographs.
26. Home Office (1997) Tackling Delays in the Youth Justice System: A Consultation Paper. London: Stationery Office.
27. Home Office (2003) Making the Right Choice: Helping Offenders Quit Crime – the Story So Far. London: Stationery Office.
28. Key, J. (2001) ‘The Rotherham experience of intensive supervision: a message from a seasoned practitioner’, Youth Justice Matters, 10–12.
29. Latessa, E.J. and Vitto, G.F. (1988) ‘The effects of intensive supervision on shock probationers’, Journal of Criminal Justice, 16, 319–330.
30. Lipsey, M.W. and Wilson, D.B. (1998) ‘Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders: a synthesis of research’, in R. Loeber and D.P. Farrington (eds), Serious and Violent Juvenile Offenders: Risk Factors and Successful Interventions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Little, M., Kogan, J., Bullock, R. and Van der Lann, P. (2004) ‘ISSP: an experiment in multi-systemic responses to persistent young offenders known to children’s services’, British Journal of Criminology, 44, 225–240.
32. Lobley, D., Smith, D. and Stern, C. (2001) Freagarrach: An Evaluation of a Project for Persistent Juvenile Offenders. Edinburgh: Stationery Office.
33. López-Viets, V., Walker, D.D. and Miller, W.R. (2002) ‘What is motivation to change? a scientific analysis’, in M. McMurran (ed.), Motivating Offenders to Change: A Guide to Enhancing Engagement in Therapy. Chichester: Wiley.
34. McGuire, J. (2002a) ‘Integrating findings from research reviews’, in J. McGuire (ed.), Offender Rehabilitation and Treatment: Effective Programmes and Policies to Reduce Reoffending. Chichester: Wiley.
35. McGuire, J. (2002b) ‘Motivation for what? Effective programmes for motivated offenders’, in M. McMurran (ed.), Motivating Offenders to Change: A Guide to Enhancing Engagement in Therapy. Chichester: Wiley.
36. McGuire, J. and Priestley, P. (1995) ‘Reviewing “what works”: past, present and future’, in J. McGuire (ed.), What Works: Reducing Reoffending: Guidelines from Research and Practice. Chichester: Wiley.
37. Mair, G., Lloyd, C., Nee, C. and Sibbit, R. (1994) Intensive Probation in England and Wales: An Evaluation, Home Office Research Study 133. London: HMSO.
38. Meisel, J.S. (2001) ‘Relationships and juvenile offenders: the effects of intensive aftercare supervision’, Prison Journal, 81, 206–245.
39. Moore, R., Gray, E., Roberts, C., Merrington, S., Waters, I., Fernandez, R., Hayward, G. and Rogers, R.D. (forthcoming) National Evaluation of the Intensive Supervision and Surveillance Programme: Final Evaluation Report to the Youth Justice Board. London: YJB.
40. Muncie, J. (1997) ‘Shifting sands: care, community and custody in youth justice discourse’, in J. Roche and S. Turner (eds), Youth in Society. London: Sage/Open University.
41. Muncie, J. (1999) Youth and Crime: A Critical Introduction. London: Sage.
42. Palmer, T. (1992) The Re-emergence of Correctional Intervention. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43. Petersilia, J. and Turner, S. (1992) ‘An evaluation of intensive probation in California’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 610-658.
44. Pitts, J. (2001) ‘Korrectional karaoke: New Labour and the zombification of youth justice’, Youth Justice, 1 (2), 3–16.
45. Pitts, J. (2002) ‘The end of an era’, in J. Muncie, G. Hughes and E. McLaughlin (eds), Youth Justice: Critical Readings. London: Sage, pp. 413-424.
46. Potter, M. (1998) ‘Serious persistent young offenders’, Prison Service Journal, 116, 9–10.
47. Probation Studies Unit (2002) Intensive Supervision and Surveillance Programmes for Persistent Young Offenders in England and Wales. Evaluation Overview. Oxford: Probation Studies Unit.
48. Probation Studies Unit (2003) Intensive Supervision and Surveillance Programmes for Persistent Young Offenders in England and Wales. Practitioner Bulletin No. 2: Interim National Findings. Oxford: Probation Studies Unit.
49. Roberts, C., Baker, K., Merrington, S. and Jones, S. (2001) The Validity and Reliability of ASSET: Interim Report to the Youth Justice Board. Oxford: Probation Studies Unit.
50. Smith, R. (2003) Youth Justice: Ideas, Policy, Practice. Cullompton: Willan.
51. Tonry, M. (1998) ‘Intermediate sanctions’, in M. Tonry (ed.), The Handbook of Crime and Punishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52. Turner, S. and Petersilia, J. (1992) ‘Focusing on high-risk parolees: an experiment to reduce commitments to the Texas Department of Corrections’, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29, 34–61.
53. Utting, D. and Vennard, J. (2000) What Works with Young Offenders in the Community. Ilford: Barnardos.
54. Worrall, A. and Walton, D. (2000) ‘Prolific offender projects, and the reduction of volume property crime: targeted policing and case management’, Vista, 7, 34-37.
55. Youth Justice Board (2000a) ASSET: Explanatory Notes. London: YJB.
56. Youth Justice Board (2000b) ‘Intensive Supervision and Surveillance Programmes’, unpublished YJB document.
57. Youth Justice Board (2000c) National Standards for Youth Justice. London: YJB.
58. Youth Justice Board (2002a) Building on Success: Youth Justice Board Review 2001/2002. London: YJB.
59. Youth Justice Board (2002b) Intensive Supervision and Surveillance Programme (ISSP): A new option for dealing with prolific and serious young offenders. YJB leaflet (updated June 2002)
60. Youth Justice Board (2002c) ISSP Eligibility Criteria. YJB letter to ISSP Managers, 22 April 2002.