How to present fallacious messages persuasively the case of the nigeria spam letters

Considering Pragma-Dialectics: A Festschrift for Frans H. Van Eemeren on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 161-173

  Kienpointner, Kienpointner ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925751155     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410614155     Document Type: Chapter

References (19)

1. Aristoteles (1976). Rhetorik. Ed. R. Kassel. Berlin: De Gruyter.
2. Eemeren, F. H. van (Ed.) (2002). Advances in pragma-dialectics. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
3. Eemeren, F. H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (1999a). Delivering the goods in critical discussion. In F. H. van emeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, & C. A. Willard (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International onference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 163-167). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
4. Eemeren, F. H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (1999b). William the Silent’s argumentative discourse. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, & C. A. Willard (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 168-171). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
5. Eemeren, F. H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (2002a). Strategic maneuvering with the burden of proof. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.). Advances in pragma-Dialectics (pp. 13-28). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
6. Eemeren, F. H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (2002b). Strategic maneuvering: Maintaining a delicate balance. In F. H. van Eemeren, & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis (pp. 131-159). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
7. Eemeren, F. H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (2003). More about fallacies as derailments of strategic maneuvering: The case of tu quoque. In The [CD-rom] Proceedings of the IL@25 Conference at the University of Windsor. Windsor, Ontario: University of Windsor.
8. Eemeren, F. H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (2005). More about an arranged marriage. In T. Goodnight (Ed.), Critical problems in argumentation. Proceedings of the 13th NCA/AFA Conference in Alta, Utah, June 2003 (pp. 345-355). Washington, DC: NCA.
9. Eemeren, F. H. van, Houtlosser, P., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2005). Dialectische profielen en indicatoren van argumentatieve zetten [Dialectical profiles and indicators of argumentative moves]. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 27, 42-54.
10. Gilbert, M. A. (2001). Emotional messages. Argumentation, 15, 239-249.
11. Kienpointner, M. (1992a). How to classify arguments. In F.H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, A. Blair, & C. A. Willard (Eds.), Argumentation illuminated (pp. 178-188). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
12. Kienpointner, M. (1992b). Alltagslogik. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.
13. Plantin, C. (1998). Les raisons des emotions. In M. Bondi (Ed.), Forms of argumentative discourse (pp. 3-50). Bologna: Clueb.
14. Walton, D. N (1992). The place of emotion in argument. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
15. Walton, D. N. (1996): Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Walton, D. N. (1997a). Appeal to expert opinion. Arguments from authority. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
17. Walton, D. N. (1997b). Appeal to pity. Argumentum ad misericordiam. New York: SUNY Press.
18. Walton, D. N. (1999). Appeal to popular opinion. University Park: Pennsylvania Sate University Press.
19. Woods, J. (2004). The death of argument. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.