Multidimensional situation models

Higher Level Language Processes in the Brain: Inference and Comprehension Processes

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 311-328

  Therriault, David J ^a   Rinck, Mike ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925749581     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203936443     Document Type: Chapter

References (59)

1. Albrecht, J. E., & Obrien, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19,1061-1070.
2. Albrecht, J. E., & Obrien, E. J. (1995). Goal processing and the maintenance of global coherence. In R. F. Lorch & E. J. Obrien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 263-278). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher&s course (2nd ed.). Heinle & Heinle.
4. Cook, A. E., Halleran, J. G., & Obrien, E. J. (1998). What is readily available during reading? A memory-based view of text processing. Discourse Processes, 26, 109-129.
5. de Vega, M., Diaz, J. M., & Leon, I. (1997). To know or not to know: Comprehending protagonists beliefs and their emotional consequences. Discourse Processes, 23, 169-192.
6. De Vega, M., Leon, I., & Diaz, J. M. (1996). The representation of changing emotions in reading comprehension. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 303-321.
7. Duchan, J. F., Bruder, G. A., & Hewitt, L. E. (Eds.). (1995). Deixis in narrative: A cogni-tive science perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Dutke, S., & Rinck, M. (in press). Predictability of locomotion: Effects on updating of spatial situation models during narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition.
9. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1995). Activating knowledge of fictional characters emotional states. On macrostructures, mental models, and other inventions: A brief personal history of the Kintsch-van Dijk theory. In C. A. Weaver, S. Marines, & C. R. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 141-156). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Gernsbacher, M. A., Goldsmith, H. H., & Robertson, R. R. W. (1992). Do readers mentally represent characters emotional states? Cognition and Emotion, 6, 89-111.
11. Gernsbacher, M. A., Hallada, B. M., & Robertson, R. R. W. (1998). How automatically do readers infer fictional characters emotional states? Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 271-300.
12. Gernsbacher, M. A., & Robertson, R. R. W. (1992). Knowledge activation versus sentence mapping when representing fictional characters emotional states. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7,353-371.
13. Givon, T. (1992). The grammar of referential coherence a mental processing instruc-tions. Linguistics, 30, 5-55.
14. Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., & Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to fore-grounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26,69-83.
15. Gygax, R, Oakhill, J., & Garnham, A. (2003). The representation of characters emo-tional responses: Do readers infer specific emotions? Cognition and Emotion, 17(3), 413-428.
16. Hakala, C. M. (1999). Accessibility of spatial information in a situation model. Dis-course Processes, 27(3), 261-279.
17. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Reviezv, 85, 363-394.
19. Langston, W., Kramer, D. C., & Glenberg, A. M. (1998). The representation of space in mental models derived from text. Memory & Cognition, 26(2), 247-262.
20. Lutz, M. F., & Radvansky, G. A. (1997). The fate of completed goal information. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 293-310.
21. MacWhinney, B. (2005). The emergence of grammar from perspective taking. In D. Pecher & R. Zwaan (Eds.), The grounding of cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cam-bridge University Press.
22. Magliano, J. P., Miller, & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). Indexing space and time in film understanding. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 533-545.
23. Magliano, P, Millis, K. K., Golding. M., & Barker, G. (1995). Causal connectives increase inference generation. Discourse Processes, 20, 29-49.
24. Morrow, D. G., Bower, G. H., & Greenspan, S. L. (1989). Updating situation models during narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 292-312.
25. Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., & Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26,165-187.
26. Obrien, E. J., Rizzella M. L., Albrecht,. E., & Halleran, J. G. (1998). Updating a situation model: a resonance text processing view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24,1200-1210.
27. Otero, J., Leon, J. A., & Graesser, A. C. (2002). (Eds.). The psychology of science text comprehension. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Radvansky, G. A., Zwaan, R. A., Federico, T., & Franklin, N. (1998). Retrieval from temporally organized situation models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learn-ing, Memory, and Cognition, 24,1224-1237.
29. Rapp, D. N., Gerrig, R. J., & Prentice, D. A. (2001). Readers trait-based models of characters in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 737-750.
30. Rinck, M. (2005). Spatial situation models. In A. Mijake & P. Shah (Eds.), Handbook of visuospatial thinking. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31. Rinck, M., & Bower, G. FI. (1995). Anaphora resolution and the focus of attention in situation models. Journal of Memory and Language, 34,110-131.
32. Rinck, M., & Bower, G. FI. (2000). Temporal and spatial distance in situation models. Memory & Cognition, 28,1310-1320.
33. Rinck, M., & Bower, G. H. (2004). Goal-based accessibility of entities within situation models. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 44, pp. 1-33).
34. Rinck, M., & HaFinel, A. (2002). A comparison of spatial, temporal, intentional, causal, and emotional inconsistencies in short narratives. Unpublished manuscript.
35. Rinck, M., & HaFinel, A. (2003). The relation of temporal and causal information in situation models created from text. Unpublished manuscript.
36. Rinck, M., Hahnel, A., & Becker, G. (2001). Using temporal information to construct, update, and retrieve situation models of narratives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 67-80.
37. Rinck, M., & Weber, U. (2003). Who when where: An experimental test of the event-indexing model. Memory & Cognition, 31,1284-1292.
38. Scott Rich, S., & Taylor, H. A. (2000). Not all narrative shifts function equally. Journal of Memory & Cognition, 28,1257-1266.
39. Spivey, M. J., & Geng, J. J. (2001). Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: Eye movements to absent objects. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 65(4), 235-241.
40. Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 22,153-156.
41. Suh, S., & Trabasso, T. (1993). Inferencing during reading: Converging evidence from discourse analysis, talk-aloud protocols, and recognition priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 279-300.
42. Ter Meulen, A. G. B. (1995). Representing time in natural language: The dynamic interpre-tation of tense and aspect. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Therriault, D. J., Rinck, M., & Zwaan, R. A. (2006). Assessing the influence of dimensional focus during situation model construction. Memory & Cognition, 34(1), 78-89.
44. Thiiring, M., Grobmann, I., & Wender, K. F. (1985). Causal and temporal inferences and their effects on memory for discourse. In G. Rickheit & H. Strohner (Eds.), Inferences in text processing. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
45. Trabasso, T., & Sperry, L. L. (1985). Causal relatedness and importance of story events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 595-611.
46. Trabasso, T., & Suh, S. Y. (1993). Understanding text: Achieving explanatory power coherence through on-line inferences and mental operations in working memory. Discourse Processes, 16, 3-34.
47. Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
48. Wilson, S. G., Rinck, M., McNamara, T. P, Bower, G. H., & Morrow, D. G. (1993). Mental models and narrative comprehension: Some qualifications. Journal of Memory and Language, 32,141-154.
49. Zwaan, R. A. (1996). Processing narrative time shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychol-ogy: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22,1196-1207.
50. Zwaan, R. A. (1999a). Embodied cognition, perceptual symbols, and situation models. Discourse Processes, 28, 81-88.
51. Zwaan, R. A. (1999b). Situation models: the mental leap into imagined worlds. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8,15-18.
52. Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 44, pp. 35-62). New York: Academic Press.
53. Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: an event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292-297.
54. Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P, & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 386-397.
55. Zwaan, R. A., & Oostendorp, H. (1993). Do readers construct spatial representations in naturalistic story comprehension? Discourse Processes, 16,125-143.
56. Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123,162-185.
57. Zwaan, R. A., Radvansky, G. A., Hilliard, A. E., & Curiel, M. (1998) Constructing multidimensional situation models during reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 199-220.
58. Zwaan, R. A., Radvansky, G. A., & Whitten, S. N. (2002). Themes and situation models. In M. Louwerse & W. van Peer (Eds.), Thematics: Interdisciplinary studies (pp. 35-53). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
59. Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 23(2), 168-171.