How cognitive skills forgot about gender and diversity

What Matters in Probation

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 90-121

  Shaw, Margaret ^a   Hannah Moffat, Kelly ^b  

^a International Centre for the Prevention of Crime   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925734111     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781843924920     Document Type: Chapter

References (85)

1. Abbott, B. and Kerr, D. (1995) Substance Abuse Programme for Federally Sentenced Women. Ottawa: Correctional Service of Canada.
2. Aboriginal Justice Inquiry of Manitoba (1991) Report of the Aboriginal Justice Inquiry of Manitoba. Winnipeg: Queen’s Printer.
3. Andrews, D.A. (1989) ‘Recidivism is predictable and can be influenced: using risk assessment to reduce recidivism’, Forum on Corrections Research, 1 (2).
4. Andrews, D.A. (1990) ‘Some criminological sources of anti-rehabilitation bias in the report of the Canadian Sentencing Commission’, Canadian Journal of Criminology, 32 (3): 511–523.
5. Andrews, D.A. (1996) ‘Criminal recidivism is predictable and can be influenced: an update’, Forum on Corrections Research, 8 (3).
6. Andrews, D.A. and Bonta, J. (1998) The Psychology of Criminal Conduct. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
7. Andrews, D., Bonta, J. and Hoge, R.D. (1990) ‘Classification for effective rehabilitation’, Criminal Justice And Behaviour, 17: 19–52.
8. Andrews, D., Zinger, I., Hoge, R.D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P. and Cullen, F.T. (1990) ‘Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis’, Criminology, 28 (3): 369–404.
9. Arbour, Madame Justice Louise (1996) Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Certain Events at the Prison for Women in Kingston. Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services.
10. Aubrey, R. and Hough, M. (1997) Assessing Offender’s Needs: Assessment Scales for the Probation Service. Home Office Research Study 166. London: Home Office.
11. Bhui, H.S. (1999) ‘Racism and risk assessment: linking theory to practice with black mentally disordered offenders’, Probation Journal, 46 (3): 171–181.
12. Blanchette, K. (1997a) ‘Classifying female offenders for correctional interventions’, Forum on Corrections Research, 9 (1).
13. Blanchette, K. (1997b) ‘Comparing violent and non-violent offenders on risk and need’, Forum on Corrections Research, 9 (2).
14. Blanchette, K. (1997c) Risk and Need among Federally-sentenced Female Offenders: A Comparison of Minimum-, Medium- and Maximum-security Inmates. Research Report R-58. Ottawa: Correctional Service Canada.
15. Blanchette, K. and Motiuk, L. (1995) ‘Female offenders risk assessment: the case management strategies approach.’ Paper presented at the Canadian Psychological Association Annual Convention, Charlottetown.
16. Blanchette, K. and Motiuk, L. (1997) ‘Maximum security female and male federal offenders: a comparison’, Forum on Corrections Research 9 (3).
17. Blanchette, K., Verbrugge, P. and Wichmann, C. (2002) The Custody Rating Scale. Initial Security Level Placement and Women Offenders. Research Branch Report universal means of managing offender risk’, Probation Journal, 48 (1): 3–9.
18. Gottfredson, S. (1987) ‘Prediction: an overview of selected methodological issues’, in D.M. Gottfredson and M. Tonry (eds) Prediction and Classification. Crime and Justice Vol. 9. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19. Gottfredson, D.M. and Tonry, M. (eds) (1987) Prediction and Classification. Crime and Justice Vol. 9. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20. Grant, B. and Luciani, F. (1998) Security Classification Using the Custody Rating Scale. Ottawa: Research Branch, Correctional Service of Canada.
21. Haggerty, K. (1999) ‘Correctional risk classifications: pragmatic cautions and theoretical reflections.’ Paper presented at the research workshop on ‘Risk, gender and diversity’, Toronto, May.
22. Hannah-Moffat, K. (1999) ‘Moral agent or actuarial subject: risk and Canadian women’s imprisonment’, Theoretical Criminology, 3 (1): 71–94.
23. Hannah-Moffat, K. (2000) ‘Re-forming the prison – rethinking our ideals’, in K. Hannah-Moffat and M. Shaw (eds) An Ideal Prison? Critical Essays on Women’s Imprisonment in Canada. Halifax: Fernwood.
24. Hannah-Moffat, K. (2001) Punishment in Disguise: Governance in Canadian Women’s Prisons. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
25. Hannah-Moffat, K. (2002a) ‘Lessons learned: some reflections on federal women’s prison re-form’, in P. Carlen (ed.) Women and Punishment: The Struggle for Justice. Cullompton: Willan.
26. Hannah-Moffat, K. (2002b) ‘Transformative risk subject: hybridization of risk and need.’ Paper presented at the British criminology conference, Keele University, July.
27. Hannah-Moffat, K. and Shaw, M. (eds) (2000) An Ideal Prison? Critical Essays on Women’s Imprisonment in Canada. Halifax: Fernwood.
28. Hannah-Moffat, K. and Shaw, M. (2001) Taking Risks: Incorporating Gender and Culture into the Classification and Assessment of Federally Sentenced Women in Canada. Ottawa: Status of Women Canada.
29. Harer, M.D. and Langan, N.P. (2001) ‘Gender differences in predictors of prison violence: assessing the predictive validity of a risk classification system’, Crime and Delinquency, 47 (4): 513–36.
30. Harland, A.T. (1996) Choosing Correctional Options that Work: Defining the Demand and Evaluating the Supply. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Holt, N. (1996) Inmate Classification: A Validation Study of the California System. California Department of Corrections.
32. Homel, R., Lincoln, R. and Herd, B. (1999) ‘Risk and resilience: crime and violence prevention in Aboriginal communities’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 32 (2): 182–196.
33. Jackson, M. (1999) ‘Canadian Aboriginal women and their “criminality”: the cycle of violence in the context of difference’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 32 (2): 197–208.
34. Johnson, H. (1996) Dangerous Domains: Violence against Women in Canada. Toronto: Nelson.
35. Johnson, R. (1996) Hard Time: Understanding and Reforming the Prison (2nd edn). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
36. Kendall, K. (2002) ‘Time to think again about cognitive behavioural programmes’, in P. Carlen (ed.) Women and Punishment: The Struggle for Justice. Cullompton: Willan.
37. Klein, D. (1995) ‘Crime through gender’s prism: feminist criminology in the United States’, in N.H. Rafter and F. Heidensohn (eds) International Feminist Perspectives in Criminology: Engendering a Discipline. Buckingham: Open University Press.
38. Lab, S.P. and Whitehead, J.T. (1990) ‘From “Nothing works” to “The appropriate works”: the latest stop in the search for the secular grail’, Criminology, 28 (3): 405–17.
39. Leis, T.A., Motiuk, L.L. and Ogloff, J.R.P. (1995) Forensic Psychology: Policy and Practice in Corrections. Ottawa: Corrections Service Canada.
40. Lipinski, S. (1991) ‘Adult female offenders in provincial/territorial correctional systems 1989–90’, Juristat, 11 (6).
41. Logan, C.H. and Gaes, G.G. (1993) ‘Meta-analysis and the rehabilitation of punishment’, Justice Quarterly, 10 (2): 245–63.
42. Loucks, A. and Zamble, E. (1999) ‘Predictors of recidivism in serious female offenders – Canada searches for predictors common to both men and women’, Corrections Today, February: 26–32.
43. Luhmann, N. (1993) Risk: A Sociological Theory. New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.
44. Lupton, D. (1999a) Risk. London: Routledge.
45. Lupton, D. (1999b) Risk and Socio-cultural Theory: New Directions and Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Mair, G. (1999) ‘Its a man’s man’s man’s world.’ Paper presented at the workshop on ‘Risk, gender and diversity.’ Toronto, May.
47. Martinson, R. (1974) ‘What works? Questions and answers about prison reform’, The Public Interest, 35: 22–54.
48. McGuire, J. (ed.) (1995) What Works: Reducing Reoffending. Chichester: Wiley.
49. McHugh, M. (1997) ‘Risk assessment and management of suicides in prison’, Prison Service Journal, 113: 4–8.
50. Monture-Angus, P. (2001) ‘Aboriginal women and correctional practice’, in K. Hannah-Moffat and M. Shaw (eds) An Ideal Prison? Critical Essays on Women’s Imprisonment in Canada. Halifax: Fernwood.
51. Morris, A. (1987) Women, Crime and Criminal Justice. New York, NY: Blackwell.
52. Motiuk, L. (1993) ‘Where are we in our ability to assess risk?’, Forum on Corrections Research, 5 (2).
53. Motiuk, L. (1996) ‘Targeting employment patterns to reduce offender risk and need’, Forum on Corrections Research, 8 (1): 22–4.
54. Motiuk, L. (1997) ‘Classification for correctional programming: the Offender Intake Assessment (OIA) process’, Forum on Corrections Research, 9 (1).
55. Motiuk, L. and Blanchette, K. (1998) ‘What works in assessing female offender risk and need.’ Paper presented at the sixth ICCA annual research conference, Arlington, VA.
56. Nellis, M. (1995) ‘Probation values for the 1990s’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 34 (1): 19–44.
57. O’Malley, P. (1992) ‘Risk, power and crime prevention’, Economy and Society, 21 (3): 252–275.
58. O’Malley, P. (1998) Crime and the Risk Society. Sydney: Ashgate Dartmouth.
59. O’Malley, P. (1999) The Risk Society: Implications for Justice and Beyond. Report Commissioned for the Department of Justice, Victoria, Australia.
60. Parton, N. (1996) Social Theory, Social Change and Social Work. New York, NY: Routledge.
61. Pearson, F.S., Lipton, D.S., Cleveland, C.M. and Yee, D.S. (2002). ‘The effects of behavioral/cognitive-behavioural programs on recidivism’, Crime and Delinquency, 48 (3): 576–496.
62. Petersilia, J. and Turner, S. (1987) ‘Prediction and racial minorities’, in D.M. Gottfredson and M. Tonry (eds) Prediction and Classification. Crime and Justice Vol. 9. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
63. Pollack, S. (forthcoming) ‘Anti-oppressive social work practice with women in prison: discursive reconstructions and alternative practices, British Journal of Social Work.
64. Pratt, J. (1993) ‘Dangerousness, risk and technologies of power’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 28 (3).
65. Pratt, J. (1997) Governing the Dangerous. Sydney: Federation Press.
66. Price, R. (1997) ‘On the risks of risk prediction’, Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 8 (1): 1–4.
67. Quinsey, V., Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E. and Cormier, C.A. (1998) Violent Offenders: Appraising and Managing Risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
68. Report of the Canadian Sentencing Commission (1987) Sentencing Reform: A Canadian Approach. Ottawa: Supply and Services.
69. Robinson, G. (2001) ‘Power, knowledge and “What Works” in probation’, Howard Journal, 40 (3): 235–54.
70. Ross, R. (1992) Dancing with a Ghost. Markham: Octopus.
71. Ross, R.R. and Fabiano, E.A. (1985) Correctional Afterthoughts: Programs for Female Offenders. User Report 1985–18. Ottawa: Ministry of the Solicitor General of Canada.
72. Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (1993, 1996) Bridging the Cultural Divide. Report on Aboriginal Peoples in the Criminal Justice System. Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Service.
73. Shaw, M. (2000) ‘Women, violence and disorder in prisons’, in K. Hannah- Moffat and M. Shaw (eds) An Ideal Prison? Critical Essays on Women’s Imprisonment in Canada. Halifax: Fernwood.
74. Shaw, M. and Dubois, S. (1995) Understanding Violence by Women. Ottawa: Correctional Service Canada.
75. Shaw, M., Rodgers, K., Blanchette, J., Hattem, T., Thomas, L.S. and Tamarak, L. (1991) Survey of Federally Sentenced Women: Report to the Task Force on Federally Sentenced Women. User Report 1991–4. Ottawa: Ministry of the Solicitor General.
76. Shkilnyk, A.M. (1985) A Poison Stronger than Love: The Destruction of an Ojibwa Community. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
77. Simon, J. (1987) ‘The emergence of a risk society: insurance, law and the state’, Socialist Review, 95 (1): 93–108.
78. Simon, J. (1988) ‘The ideological effects of actuarial practices’, Law and Society Review, 22 (4): 771–800.
79. Simon, J. and Feeley, M. (1995) ‘True crime: the new penology and public discourses on crime’, in T. Blomberg and S. Cohen (eds) Punishment and Social Control. New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.
80. Steffensmeier, D. and Allan, E. (1998) ‘Nature of female offending: patterns and explanation’, in R. Zaplin (ed.) Female Offenders: Critical Perspectives and Effective Interventions. Maryland: Aspen.
81. Vanstone, M. (2000) ‘Cognitive-behavioural work with offenders in the UK: a history of influential endeavour’, Howard Journal, 39 (2): 171–183.
82. Verbrugge, P. and Blanchette, K. (2002) ‘The validity of the Custody Rating Scale for the initial security classification of Aboriginal women’, Forum On Corrections Research, 14 (3).
83. Weekes, J.R., Millson, W.A. and Lightfoot, L.O. (1995) ‘Factors influencing the outcome of offender substance abuse treatment’, Forum On Corrections Research, 7 (3): 8–11.
84. Wormith, J.S. (1995) ‘The Youth Management Assessment: assessment of young offenders at risk of serious offending.’
85. Zaplin, R.T. (ed.) (1998) Female Offenders: Critical Perspectives And Effective Interventions. Maryland: Aspen.