Disclosing information on sex offenders: The human rights implications

Sex Offenders in the Community: Managing and Reducing the Risks

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 72-101

  Power, Helen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLAMORGAN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925726871     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315065618     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. Adams, D. (2002) ‘Summary of State Sex Offender Registries, 2001’, Bureau of Justice Statistics Fact Sheet (March). US Department of Justice.
2. Barber, I. (1998a) ‘Privacy and the police: private right, public right or human right?’, Public Law 15, pp. 19–24.
3. Barber, I. (1998b) ‘Disclosure of information by police’, Journal of Criminal Law, pp. 115–17.
4. Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
5. Beck, U. (1999) World Risk Society. London: Sage.
6. Bedingfield, M. (1998) The Child in Need: children, the State and the law. Bristol: Family Law 1998.
7. Department of Health (2000) Protecting Children, Supporting Parents: a consultation document on the physical punishment of children. London: Department of Health.
8. Department of Health, Home Office and Department of Education and Employment (1999) Working Together to Safeguard Children. London: Department of Health. Department of Health Press Release 2001/0524. London: Department of Health.
9. Feldman, D. (2002) Civil Liberties and Human Rights in England and Wales. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Fenwick, H. (2002) Civil Liberties and Human Rights. London: Cavendish Publishing.
11. Garland, D. (2001) The Culture of Control: crime and social order in contemporary society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
13. Hebenton, B. and Thomas, T. (1997) Keeping Track? Observations on sex offender registration in the US, Police Research Series Paper 83. London: Home Office.
14. Home Office (1997) HOC 39/97: Sex Offenders Act. London: Home Office.
15. Home Office (1998) Guidance on the Crime & Disorder Act 1998: crime & disorder partnerships, Chapter 5. London: Home Office.
16. Home Office (1999) Guidance on the Disclosure of Information about Sex Offenders who may present a risk to Children and Vulnerable Adults. London: Home Office.
17. Home Office (2002a) Guidance to Police and Probation Services on the Criminal Justice & Court Services Act 2000, Sections 67 & 68 (Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements – MAPPA). London: Home Office.
18. Home Office (2002b) Protection Through Partnership: Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements Annual Report 2001–2002. London: Home Office.
19. Home Office (2003) Further Guidance to Police and Probation Services on the Criminal Justice & Court Services Act 2000, Sections 67 & 68 (Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements – MAPPA). London: Home Office.
20. Hudson, B. (2002) ‘Balancing Rights and Risk: dilemmas of justice and difference’, in N. Gray, J. Laing and L. Noaks (eds) Criminal Justice, Mental Health and the Politics of Risk. London: Cavendish Publishing, pp. 99–122.
21. Kemshall, H. (2001) Risk Assessment and Management of Known Sexual and Violent Offenders: a review of current issues, Police Research Series Paper 140. London: Home Office.
22. Kemshall, H. and Maguire, M. (2002) ‘Public Protection, Partnership and Risk Penality: the multi-agency risk management of sexual and violent offenders’, in N. Gray, J. Laing and L. Noaks (eds) Criminal Justice, Mental Health and the Politics of Risk. London: Cavendish Publishing, pp. 169–98.
23. Lemin, J. (1998) ‘To Know or Not to Know? The privacy law implications of the 1996 Paedophile and Sex Offender Index’, Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 28:2, pp. 415–40.
24. Maguire, M., Kemshall, H., Noaks, L., Sharpe, K. and Wincup, E. (2001) Risk Management of Sexual and Violent Offenders: the work of public protection panels, Police Research Series Paper 139. London: Home Office.
25. Matson, S. (2001) Community Notification and Education. Center for Sex Offender Management (available on the Center’s website: www.csom.org).
26. Matson, S. and Lieb, R. (1997) Megan’s Law: a review of state and federal legislation. (Washington State Institute for Public Policy: Document No. 97/10/1101).
27. Mowbray, A. (2001) Cases and Materials on the European Convention on Human Rights. London: Butterworths.
28. Mullender, R. (1998) ‘Privacy, paedophilia and the European Convention on Human Rights: a deontological approach’, Public Law (Autumn), pp. 384–8.
29. Nash, M. (1999) Police, Probation and Protecting the Public. London: Blackstone Press.
30. News of the World ‘Named Shamed’ (23 July 2000).
31. Paton-Simpson, E. (1998) ‘Private circles and public squares: invasion of privacy by the publication of “private facts” ’, Modern Law Review 61:3, pp. 318–40.
32. Philips, D. (1998) Community Notification as Viewed by Washington’s Citizens. (Washington State Institute for Public Policy: Document No. 98/03/1101).
33. Power, H. (1999) ‘Sex Offenders, Privacy and the Police’, Criminal Law Review, pp. 3–16.
34. Ronken, C. and Lincoln, R. (2001) ‘Deborah’s Law: the effects of naming and shaming on sex offenders in Australia’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 34:3, pp. 235–55.
35. Scott, J. and Ward, D. (1999) ‘Human rights and the probation service’, Vista, 5:2, pp. 106–18.
36. Starmer, K. (2001) ‘Positive obligations under the Convention’, in J. Jowell and J. Cooper (eds) Understanding Human Rights Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 139–59.