Raúl prebisch and the beginnings of the latin american school of economics: a rhetorical perspective

Journal of Economic Methodology

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 423-438

  Bianchi, Ana Maria ^a   Salviano, Cleofas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925724264     PISSN: 1350178X     EISSN: 14699427     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13501789900000026     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Black, H., and Sapsford, D., 1873–84. Some estimates of Prebisch and Singer effects on the terms of trade between primary producers and manufacturers. World Development, 25 (11)
2. Cardoso, F. H., and Faletto, E., 1969. Dependéncia y Desarollo en América Latina, Mexico: Siglo XXI Eds.
3. Cross, Rod. 1995. Metaphors and time reversibility and irreversibility in economic systems. Journal of Economic Methodology, 2 (1): 123–134.
4. Cuddington, J. T., 1992. Long-run trends in 26 primary commodity prices - a disaggregated look at the Prebisch-Singer hypothesis. Journal of Development Economics, 39 (2): 207–222.
5. Dadone, M., and Di Marco, L. E., 1972. “ The impact of Prebisch's ideas on modern economic analysis ”. In International Economics and Develop-ment - Essays in Honor of Rafill Prebisch, Edited by: di Marco, L. E., 15–46. New York: Academic Press.
6. Ellsworth, P. T., 1956. The terms of trade between primary producers and industrial countries. Interamerican Economic Affairs, X (1)
7. Comissión Económica para 1a América Latina. 1950. Estúdio Económico de América Latina 1949, Santiago: Secretaria Geral. (Translated to English and published as Economic Survey of Latin America 1949, UN 1951.)
8. Frank, André Gunder. 1967. Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America, New York: Monthly Review Press.
9. Furtado, Celso. 1985. A Fantasia Organizada, Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
10. Grilli, E. R., and Yang, M. C., 1988. Primary commodity prices, manufactured goods prices, and the terms of trade of developing countries: what the long run shows. The World Bank Economic Review, 2 (1): 1–47.
11. Haberler, Gottfried. 1961. “ Terms of trade and economic development ”. In Economic Development of Latin America, Edited by: Ellis, H. S., 275–297. New York: St Martin's Press.
12. Henderson, Willie. 1994. “ Metaphor and economics ”. In New Directions in Economic Methodology, Edited by: Backhouse, R. E., 343–368. London: Routledge.
13. Hirschman, Albert. 1971. A Bias for Hope. Essays on development and Latin America, New Haven: Yale University Press.
14. Love, Joseph L., 1980. Raúl Prebisch and the origins of the doctrine of unequal exchange. Latin American Research Review, XV (3): 45–72.
15. Maki, Uskali. 1995. Diagnosing McCloskey. Journal of Economic Literature, 33: 1300–1318.
16. Mayer, T., 1997. The rhetoric of Friedman's quantity theory manifesto. Journal of Economic Methodology, 4 (2): 199–200.
17. McCloskey, Donald. 1994. “ How to do a rhetorical analysis, and why ”. In New Directions in Economic Methodology, Edited by: Backhouse, R. E., 319–342. London: Routledge.
18. Milberg, William. 1996. The rhetoric of policy relevance in international economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 3 (2): 237–259.
19. Mirowski, P., 1989. More heat than light, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Perelman, C. H., and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L., 1969. The New Rhetoric. A treatise on argumentation, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
21. Pinto, A., and Knakal, J., 1973. The centre-periphery system twenty years later. Social and Economic Studies, March: 34–89.
22. Pollock, D.H. (1978) ‘Some changes in US attitudes towards CEPAL over the last 30 years’, CEPAL Review 2nd semester.
23. Pollock, D. H., 1987. Raúl Prebisch visto desde Washington: una percepción cambiante. Comércio Exterior, 37 (5): 366–370. Also published in the Canadian Journal of Development Studies 9(1): 121–9,1988.]
24. Rodrik, Dani. 1998. Globalization, social conflict and economic growth. World Economy, 21 (2): 143–158.
25. Salviano, Cleofas, Jr. 1993. “ O discurso cepalino: ensaio de análise retórica’, Master dissertation, Department of Economics ”. Universidade de São Paulo.
26. Santa Cruz, H., 1987. La proyeccin latinoamericana y mundial de la obra de Raúl Prebisch. Comércio Exterior, 37 (5): 371–373.
27. Singer, H. W., 1950. The distribution of gains between investing and borrowing countries. American Economic Review, XV (2): 473–485.
28. Street, James H., and Raul, Prebisch. 1901–1986. Journal of Economic Issues, XXI (2): 649–659. An appreciation
29. Viner, J., 1951. Comércio internacional y desarrollo económico Madri, Technos
30. Ziesemer, T. (1998) ‘A history of economic theorizing on the Prebisch-Singer-thesis’, in J. Glombowski et al. History of continental economic thought, Marburg: Metropolis Verlas, pp. 337–65.