Robust phase-based texture descriptor for classification of breast ultrasound images

BioMedical Engineering Online

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 1-

  Cai, Lingyun ^a   Wang, Xin ^a   Wang, Yuanyuan ^a,b   Guo, Yi ^a,b   Yu, Jinhua ^a,b   Wang, Yi ^c  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) of Shanghai   (China)

^c FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Breast ultrasound; Local binary pattern; Phase congruency; Texture feature; Tumor classification

Indexed keywords

BUSES; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE RETRIEVAL; IMAGE TEXTURE; MEDICAL IMAGING; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; TEXTURES; TUMORS; ULTRASONICS;

BREAST ULTRASOUND; LOCAL BINARY PATTERNS; PHASE CONGRUENCY; TEXTURE FEATURES; TUMOR CLASSIFICATION;

IMAGE CLASSIFICATION;

ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; CLASSIFIER; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; ILLUMINATION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; PHASE BASED TEXTURE DESCRIPTOR; PHASED CONGRUENCY BASED BINARY PATTERN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; TUMOR CLASSIFICATION; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; BREAST PAPILLOMA; BREAST TUMOR; CARCINOMA; CLASSIFICATION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; FIBROADENOMA; PHYSICAL PHENOMENA; PROCEDURES; RADIATION SCATTERING;

AREA UNDER CURVE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; FIBROADENOMA; HUMANS; PAPILLOMA, INTRADUCTAL; PHYSICAL PHENOMENA; ROC CURVE; SCATTERING, RADIATION; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 84925724218     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1475925X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12938-015-0022-8     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2013. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2013.
2. Kaul K, Daguilh FML. Early detection of breast cancer: is mammograpgy enough. Hosp Physician. 2002;38(9):233-44.
3. Cheng HD, Cai X, Chen X, Hu L, Lou X. Computer-aided detection and classification of microcalcifications in mammograms: a survey. Pattern Recogn. 2003;36(12):2967-91.
4. Crystal P, Strano SD, Shcharynski S, Koretz MJ. Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181(1):177-82.
5. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology. 1995;196(1):123-34.
6. Cheng HD, Shan J, Ju W, Guo Y, Zhang L. Automated breast cancer detection and classification using ultrasound images: a survey. Pattern Recogn. 2010;43(1):299-317.
7. Huang YL, Chen DR, Jiang YR, Kuo SJ, Wu HK, Moon WK. Computer-aided diagnosis using morphological features for classifying breast lesions on ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32(4):565-72.
8. Chang RF, Wu WJ, Moon WK, Chen DR. Automatic ultrasound segmentation and morphology based diagnosis of solid breast tumors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;89(2):179-85.
9. Garra BS, Krasner BH, Horii SC, Ascher S, Mun SK, Zeman RK. Improving the distinction between benign and malignant breast lesions: the value of sonographic texture analysis. Ultrason Imaging. 1993;15(4):267-85.
10. Chen DR, Chang RF, Huang YL, Chou YH, Tiu CM, Tsai PP. Texture analysis of breast tumors on sonograms. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI. 2000;21(4):308-16.
11. Chen DR, Chang RF, Kuo WJ, Chen MC, Huang YL. Diagnosis of breast tumors with sonographic texture analysis using wavelet transform and neural networks. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002;28(10):1301-10.
12. Mogatadakala KV, Donohue KD, Piccoli CW, Forsberg F. Detection of breast lesion regions in ultrasound images using wavelets and order statistics. Med Phys. 2006;33(4):840-9.
13. Alvarenga AV, Pereira WCA, Infantosi AFC, Azevedo CM. Complexity curve and grey level co-occurrence matrix in the texture evaluation of breast tumor on ultrasound images. Med Phys. 2007;34(2):379-87.
14. Huber S, Danes J, Zuna I, Teubner J, Medl M, Delorme S. Relevance of sonographic B-mode criteria and computer-aided ultrasonic tissue characterization in differential/diagnosis of solid breast masses. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000;26(8):1243-52.
15. Lefebvre F, Meunier M, Thibault F, Laugier P, Berger G. Computerized ultrasound B-scan characterization of breast nodules. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000;26(9):1421-8.
16. Sivaramakrishna R, Powell KA, Lieber ML, Chilcote WA, Shekhar R. Texture analysis of lesions in breast ultrasound images. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2002;26(5):303-7.
17. Kuo WJ, Chang RF, Lee CC, Moon WK, Chen DR. Retrieval technique for the diagnosis of solid breast tumors on sonogram. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002;28(7):903-9.
18. Gómez W, Pereira W, Infantosi A. Analysis of co-occurrence texture statistics as a function of gray-level quantization for classifying breast ultrasound. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012;31(10):1889-99.
19. Matsumoto MMS, Sehgal CM, Udupa JK. Local binary pattern texture-based classification of solid masses in ultrasound breast images. SPIE Medical Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics 2012: 83201H-83201H-8.
20. Yang MC, Moon WK, Wang YF, Bae MS, Huang CS, Chen JH, et al. Robust texture analysis using multi-resolution gray-scale invariant features for breast sonographic tumor diagnosis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2013;32(12):2262-73.
21. Zhang Q, Xiao Y, Chen S, Wang C, Zheng H. Quantification of elastic heterogeneity using contourlet-based texture analysis in shear-wave elastography for breast tumor classification. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41(2):588-600.
22. Oppenheim A, Lim J. The importance of phase in signal. Proc IEEE. 1981;69(5):529-41.
23. Vo A, Oraintara S, Nguyen TT. Using phase and magnitude information of the complex directional filter bank for texture image retrieval. Image Process (ICIP) 2007, Int Conf on IEEE. 2007;4:IV-61-4.
24. Nguyen-Duc H, Bui-Thu C, Do-Hong T, Le-Tien T: Texture image retrieval using phase-based features in the complex wavelet domain. Advanced Technologies for Communications (ATC), 2010 International Conference on. IEEE 2010: 158-63.
25. Gundimada S, Asari VK. A novel neighborhood defined feature selection on phase congruency images for recognition of faces with extreme variations. Int J Comput Inf Syst Control Eng. 2007;1(7):2033-9.
26. Buciu I, Nafornita I. Feature extraction through cross-phase congruency for facial expression analysis. Int J Pattern Recognit. 2009;23(3):617-35.
27. th International Conference on. IEEE 2012: 166-70.
28. Morrone MC, Owens RA. Feature detection from local energy. Pattern Recognit Lett. 1982;6(5):303-12.
29. Kovesi P. Phase congruency: a low-level image invariant. Psychol Res. 2000;64(2):136-48.
30. Kovesi P. Phase congruency detects corners and edges. DICTA. 2003;2003:309-18.
31. Ojala T, Pietikainen M, Maenpaa T. Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2002;24(7):971-87.
32. Guo Z, Zhang L, Zhang D. Rotation invariant texture classification using LBP variance (LBPV) with global matching. Pattern Recognit. 2010;43(3):706-19.
33. Wu WJ, Lin SW, Moon WK. Combining support vector machine and genetic algorithm to classify ultrasound breast tumor images. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2012;36(8):627-33.
34. Huang D, Shan C, Ardabilian M, Wang Y, Chen L. Local binary patterns and its application to facial image analysis: a survey. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C Applicat Rev. 2011;41(6):765-81.
35. Manjunath BS, Ma WY. Texture features for browsing and retrieval of image data. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1996;18(8):837-42.
36. Liao YY, Tsui PH, Li CH, Chang KJ, Kuo WH, Chang CC, et al. Classification of scattering media within benign and malignant breast tumors based on ultrasound texture-feature-based and Nakagami-parameter images. Med Phys. 2011;38(4):2198-207.
37. Chen CM, Chou YH, Han KC, Hung GS, Tiu CM, Chiou HJ, et al. Breast lesions on sonograms: computer-aided diagnosis with nearly setting- independent features and artificial neural networks. Radiology. 2003;226(2):504-14.
38. Chen DR, Chang RF, Huang YL. Computer-aided diagnosis applied to US of solid breast nodules by using neural networks. Radiology. 1999;213(2):407-12.
39. Hsu CW, Chang CC, Lin CJ. A practical guide to support vector classification. Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, National Taiwan University, 2003. URL http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/papers/guide/guide.pdf.
40. Chang CC, Lin CJ. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol. 2011;2(3):27.
41. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143(1):29-36.
42. Matthews BW. Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1975;405(2):442-51.
43. Baldi P, Brunak S, Cgayvin Y, Andersen CAF, Nielsen H. Assessing the accuracy of prediction algorithms for classification: An overview. Bioinformatics. 2000;16(5):412-24.
44. Sahiner B, Chan HP, Hadjiiski L. Classifier performance prediction for computer-aided diagnosis using a limited dataset. Med Phys. 2008;35(4):1559-70.
45. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE. Digital image processing. 3rd ed. London: Pearson; 2009.
46. Masotti M, Campanini R. Texture classification using invariant ranklet features. Pattern Recognit Lett. 2008;29(14):1980-6.
47. Shaffer JP. Multiple hypothesis testing. Annu Rev Psychol. 1995;46(1):561-84.