Remedies and the classification of obligations

The Law of Obligations: Connections and Boundaries

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 11-30

  Tilbury, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925713395     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781843147701     Document Type: Chapter

References (127)

1. Birks, P, An Introduction to the Law of Restitution, Oxford: Clarendon, 1985.
2. Birks, P, 'Introduction,' in Birks, P (ed), English Private Law, Oxford: OUP, 2000, vol 1, xxxv-li.
3. McBride, NJ, 'The Classification of Obligations and Legal Education,' in Birks, P (ed), The Classification of Obligations, Oxford: Clarendon, 1997, 88-89.
4. Waters, DWM, 'Liability and Remedy: An Adjustable Relationship' (2001) 64 Saskatchewan L Rev 429
5. Evans, S, 'Defending Discretionary Remedialism' (2001) 23 Syd LR 463.
6. Wright, DM, The Remedial Constructive Trust, Sydney: Butterworths, 1998.
7. Barker, K, 'Rescuing Remedialism in Unjust Enrichment Law: Why Remedies are Right' [1998] CLJ 301 (dealing more generally with unjust enrichment).
8. Birks, P, 'Rights, Wrongs, and Remedies' (2000) 20 OJLS 1
9. Zimmermann, R, The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition, Cape Town: Juta & Co, 1990, 1
10. Birks, P, 'Obligations: One Tier or Two,' in Stein, PG and Lewis, ADE (eds), Studies in Justinian's Institutes in Memory of JAC Thomas, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1983, 19f.
11. Birks, P, 'Definition and Division: A Meditation on Institutes 3. 13,' in Birks (ed)
12. Thomas, JAC, Textbook of Roman Law, Amsterdam: North Holland, 1976, 219-23
13. Meagher, RP, Heydon, JD and Leeming, MJ, Equity: Doctrine and Remedies, Sydney: Butterworths, 4th edn, 2002, [23-105]
14. Justice Thomas, 'An Endorsement of a More Flexible Law of Civil Remedies' (1999) 7 Waikato L Rev 23, 36-37 (arguing for an integrated law of obligations which identifies the 'essential obligation').
15. Wieacker, F, A History of Private Law in Europe with Particular Reference to Germany, Oxford: Clarendon, 1995, 186-89.
16. Vranken, M, Fundamentals of European Civil Law, Sydney: Federation, 1997, 83-84.
17. Bell, J, Boyron, S and Whittaker, S, Principles of French Law, Oxford: OUP, 1998, 304-05.
18. Law Society and Council of Legal Education, Notice to Law Schools regarding Full-Time Qualifying Law Degrees (1995).
19. Robertson, A, 'On the Distinction between Contract and Tort,' Chapter 6 of this volume.
20. Tilbury, M and Carter, JW, 'Converging Liabilities and Security of Contract: Contributory Negligence in Australian Law' (2000) 16 J Cont L 78, especially at 80-93.
21. Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1955 (ACT), s 15(1) (read with the definition of 'wrong' in s 14)
22. Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1965 (NSW), s 9(1) (read with the definition of 'wrong' in s 8)
23. Statutory Duties (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 (NSW), s 2
24. Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1955 (NT), s 16(1) (read with the definition of 'wrong' in s 15(1))
25. Law Reform Act 1995 (Qld), s 10 (read with the definition of 'wrong' in s 5)
26. Law Reform (Contributory Negligence and Apportionment of Liability) Act 2001 (SA), s 7
27. Wrongs Act 1954 (Tas), s 4(1) (read with the definition of 'wrong' in s 2)
28. Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic), s 26(1) (read with the definition of 'wrong' in s 25).
29. Craig v Troy (1997) 16 WAR 96, 152-55 (Malcolm CJ)
30. Tilbury, MJ, Civil Remedies, Sydney: Butterworths, 1990, vol 1, [1002]-[1004].
31. Tilbury, M, Noone, M and Kercher, B, Remedies: Commentary and Materials, Sydney: LBC Information Services, 3rd edn, 2000, 4.
32. Austin, J, Lectures on Jurisprudence, 5th edn, Campbell, R (ed), London: John Murray, 1885, Lecture XLV.
33. Siskina v Distos Campania Naviera SA [1979] AC 210, 254 (Lord Diplock).
34. Birks, P, 'Equity in the Modern Law: An Exercise in Taxonomy' (1996) 26 UWA L Rev 1, 10-12, 40-42.
35. Hasham v Zenab [1960] AC 316, 329 (PC) (Lord Tucker).
36. Spry, ICF, The Principles of Equitable Remedies: Specific Performance, Injunctions, Rectification and Equitable Damages, Sydney: LBC Information Services, 6th edn, 2001, 52-53.
37. Burrows, A, Remedies for Torts and Breach of Contract, London: Butterworths, 2nd edn, 1994, 335.
38. Maddison v Alderson (1883) 8 App Cas 467, 475-76.
39. McBride v Sandland (1918) 25 CLR 69, 77
40. JC Williamson v Lukey and Mulholland (1931) 45 CLR 282, 300, 309
41. Steadman v Steadman [1976] AC 536, 552, 559.
42. Turner v Bladin (1951) 82 CLR 463, 472 (Williams, Fullagar and Kitto JJ).
43. Laycock, D, The Death of the Irreparable Injury Rule, New York: OUP, 1991.
44. Attica Sea Carriers Corp v Ferrostaal Poseidon Bulk Redderei GmbH (The Puerto Buitrago) [1976] 1 Lloyd's Rep 250, 255
45. Hammond, G, 'Rethinking Remedies: The Changing Conception of the Relationship Between Legal and Equitable Remedies,' in Berryman, J (ed), Remedies: Issues and Perspectives, Scarborough: Carswell, 1991, Ch 4
46. Hammond, G, 'The Place of Damages in the Scheme of Remedies,' in Finn, P (ed), Essays on Damages, Sydney: Law Book Co, 1992, Ch 9.
47. Butler v Countrywide Finance Ltd [1993] 1 NZLR 623 especially at 631-33
48. Brown v Pourau [1995] 1 NZLR 352 especially at 368.
49. Birks, P and Mitchell, C, 'Unjust Enrichment,' in Birks (ed), [15. 182]-[15. 211].
50. Pettkus v Becker [1980] 2 SCR 834
51. Lac Minerals Ltd v International Corona Resources Ltd [1989] 2 SCR 574
52. Cadbury Schweppes Inc v FBI Foods [1999] 1 SCR 142
53. Rawluk v Rawluk [1990] 1 SCR 70.
54. XL Petroleum (NSW) Pty Ltd v Caltex Oil (Aust) Pty Ltd (1985) 155 CLR 448, 468-69 (Brennan J).
55. Gray v Motor Accident Commission (1998) 196 CLR 1
56. Kuddus v Chief Constable of Leicestershire Constabulary [2002] 2 AC 122
57. AB v South West Water Services Ltd [1993] QB 507.
58. Edelman, J, 'The Meaning of "Damages": Common Law and Equity,' Chapter 3 of this volume.
59. Whitfield v De Lauret & Co Ltd (1920) 29 CLR 71, 77
60. Gray v Motor Accident Commission (1998)
61. Restatement of the Law Second, Contract 2d, St Paul: American Law Institute, 1981, sec 349.
62. Anglia TV v Reed [1972] 1 QB 60
63. Bowlay Logging Ltd v Domtar Ltd [1978] WWR
64. Commonwealth of Australia v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd (1991) 174 CLR 64.
65. Commonwealth of Australia v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd (1991) 104 ALR 1.
66. Robinson v Harman (1848) 1 Exch 850, 855
67. Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington LBC [1996] AC 669 (simple or compound interest?)
68. Yorkshire Insurance Co v Nisbet Shipping Co Ltd [1962] 2 QB 330, 340-41
69. L Lucas Ltd v Export Credits Guarantee Department [1973] 1 WLR 914, 924.
70. Harvela Investments Ltd v Royal Trust Company of Canada (CI) Ltd [1986] AC 207.
71. Jordan, F, Chapters on Equity in New South Wales, Sydney: Government Printer, 6th edn, 1947, 15.
72. Parsons (Livestock) Ltd v Uttley Ingham & Co Ltd [1978] QB 791, 802
73. Dodd Properties Ltd v Canterbury City Council [1980] 1 WLR 433
74. Howe v Teefy (1927) 27 SR (NSW) 301.
75. Beatson, J, The Use and Abuse of Unjust Enrichment, Oxford: Clarendon, 1991, 250-51.
76. Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCA 10 (7 February) at [15] (Spigelman CJ).
77. Ryan v Mutual Tontine Westminster Chambers Association [1893] 1 QB 116
78. JC Williamson Ltd v Lukey and Mulholland (1931) 45 CLR 282 ('constant supervision').
79. Berryman, J, 'The Specific Performance Damages Continuum: A Historical Perspective' (1985) 17 Ottawa L Rev 295.
80. ANZ Executors and Trustees Ltd v Humes Ltd [1990] VR 615
81. Argyll v Argyll [1967] Ch 302 ('clean hands' defence).
82. CH Giles & Co Ltd v Morris [1972] 1 WLR 307
83. Posner v Scott-Lewis [1987] Ch 25
84. Hill v CA Parsons & Co Ltd [1972] Ch 305.
85. Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia (1998) 195 CLR 1, [78]-[81]
86. Co-operative Insurance Society v Argyll Stores (Holdings) Ltd [1998] AC 1
87. Dowsett v Reid (1912) 15 CLR 695.
88. Bridgewater v Leahy (1998) 194 CLR 457, [127] (Gaudron, Gummow and Kirby JJ).
89. Vadasz v Poineer Concrete (SA) Pty Ltd (1995) 184 CLR 102, 114.
90. Wood, R (ed), Remedial Law: When Courts Become Administrators, Amherst, MA: Massachusetts UP, 1990.
91. Gewirtz, P, 'Remedies and Resistance' (1983) 92 Yale LJ 585
92. Jeffries, JC, 'The Right-Remedy Gap in Constitutional Law' (1999) 109 Yale LJ 87.
93. Central Trust Co v Rafuse [1986] SCR 147
94. Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd [1995] 2 AC 145
95. Astley v Austrust Ltd (1999) 197 CLR 1.
96. United Australia Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd [1941] AC 1
97. Tang Man Sit v Capacious Investments Ltd [1996] AC 514.
98. Akron Securities v Iliffe (1997) 41 NSWLR 353, 364, 366 (Mason P)
99. Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1, 61 (Brennan J)
100. Birks, P, 'Three Kinds of Objection to Discretionary Remedialism' (2000) 29 UWA L Rev 1, 3.
101. New South Wales Law Reform Commission, Sentencing (Discussion Paper 33, 1996), Chapters 3, 5 and 6.
102. Tilbury, M, 'Teaching Remedies in Australia' (2001) 39 Brandeis LJ 587, 593-94.
103. Waddams, SM, 'Judicial Discretion' (2001) 1 Oxf U Commonwealth LJ 59.
104. Davis, KC, Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry, Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State UP, 1969.
105. Cooper-Stephenson, K, 'Principle and Pragmatism in the Law of Remedies,' in Berryman, J (ed), Remedies: Issues and Perspectives, Scarborough: Carswell, 1991, Chapter 1.
106. Wright, D, 'Wrong and Remedy: A Sticky Relationship' [2001] Singapore J Leg Stud 1.
107. Edelman, J, 'The Meaning of "Damages": Common Law and Equity,' Chapter 3 of this volume.
108. Finn, P, 'Equitable Doctrine and Discretion in Remedies,' in Cornish, W et al (eds), Restitution: Past, Present and Future, Oxford: Hart, 1998, Chapter 17.
109. Birks, P, 'The Law of Restitution at the End of an Epoch' (1999) 28 UWA L Rev 13, 17.
110. Birks, P, 'The Concept of a Civil Wrong,' in Owen, DG (ed), Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law, Oxford: Clarendon, 1995, 37-42 (in the context of tort).
111. Fuller, LL and Perdue, WR, 'The Reliance Interest in Contract Damages' (1936 and 1937) 46 Yale LJ 52 and 374.
112. Summers, RS, Lon L Fuller, Stanford, CA: Stanford UP, 1984, 133.
113. Edelman, J, 'The Meaning of "Damages": Common Law and Equity,' Chapter 3 of this volume.
114. Burrows, A, 'We Do This at Common Law but That in Equity' (2002) 22 OJLS 1, 15.
115. Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCCA 10 (7 February), [2]
116. McGregor, H, McGregor on Damages, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 16th edn, 1997, [12]-[18].
117. Scott v Scott (1963) 109 CLR 649, 663-64
118. Attorney-General for Hong Kong v Reid [1994] 1 AC 324 (PC)
119. Gain-Based Damages, Oxford, Hart, 2002, 258-60, 262-64.
120. McGregor, H, 'Restitutionary Damages,' in Birks, P (ed), Wrongs and Remedies in the 21st Century, Oxford: OUP, 1996, Ch 9.
121. Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCA 10 (7 February 2003).
122. Canson Enterprises Ltd v Boughton & Co [1991] 3 SCR 534
123. McLachlin J. And Rickett, C, 'Compensation for Loss in Equity-Choosing the Right Horse for Each Course,' in Birks, P and Rose, F (eds), Restitution and Equity, London: Mansfield, 2000, vol 1, Chapter 10.
124. South Australia v Johnson (1982) 42 ALR 161, 167-70 (Gibbs CJ, Mason, Murphy, Wilson and Brennan JJ)
125. Smith New Court Securities Ltd v Citibank NA [1997] AC 254.
126. Attorney-General (NSW) v Perpetual Trustee Co (Ltd) (1952) 85 CLR 237, 285 (affirmed (1955) 92 CLR 113).
127. Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCCA 10 (7 February), [12] (Spigelman CJ)