Appraising the objectivity of landscape dimensions

Natural Environments: Studies in Theoretical and Applied Analysis

Volumn 6, Issue , 2013, Pages 292-346

  Craik, Kenneth H ^a  

^a NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925705214     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315064161     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Block, J. 1961. The Q-sort Method in Personality Assessment and Psychiatric Research. Springfield, Ill.: C. C. Thomas.
2. Canter, D. 1969. An intergroup comparison of connotative dimensions in architecture. Environment and Behavior 1:37-48.
3. Child, I. 1969. Esthetics. In G. Lindzey and A. Aronson (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. III. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
4. Cline, V. B. 1964. lnterperson perception. In B. A. Maher (ed.), Progress in Experimental Personality Research, vol. 1. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 221-84.
5. Collins, J. B. 1968. Some verbal dimensions of architectural space perception. Architectural Psychology Newsletter 2:4-5.
6. Collins, J. B. 1969. Perceptual dimensions of architectural space validated against behavioral criteria. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utah.
7. Coughlin, R. E., and Goldstein, K. A. 1970. The extent of agreement among observers on environmental attractiveness. RSRI Discussion Paper Series, no. 37. Philadelphia, Pa.: Regional Science Research Institute.
8. Craik, K. H. 1968. The comprehension of the everyday physical environment. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 34:29-37.
9. Craik, K. H. 1969(a). Human responsiveness to landscape: An environmental psychological perspective. In K. Coates and K. Moffett (eds.), Response to Environment. Student Publication of the School of Design, vol. 18. Raleigh: North Carolina State University. Pp. 168-93.
10. Craik, K. H. 1969(b). Transportation and the person. High Speed Ground Transportation Journal 3: 86-91.
11. Craik, K. H. 1970. Environmental psychology. In Craik et al., New Directions in Psychology 4. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Pp. 1-122.
12. Gough, H. G., and Heilbrun, A. B., Jr. 1965. The Adjective Check List Manual. Palo Alto, Calif.: Consulting Psychologists Press.
13. Hershberger, R. G. 1969. A study of meaning and architecture. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
14. Kasmar, J. V., and Vidulich, R.N. 1968. A factor analytic study of environmental description. Unpublished report, Los Angeles, Medical Center, University of California.
15. Litton, R. B., Jr. 1968. Forest Landscape Description and Inventories: A Basis for Land Planning and Design. USDA Forest Service Research Paper PSW -49. Berkeley, California: Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.
16. Litton, R. B., and Twiss, R. H. 1967. The forest landscape: Some elements of visual analysis. Proceedings of the Society of American Foresters: 1966, Washington, D.C.: Society of American Foresters. Pp. 212-14.
17. Lowenthal, D., et al.1967. An analysis of environmental perception. Unpublished. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.
18. Rabinowitz, C. B., and Coughlin, R. E. 1970. Analysis of landscape characteristics relevant to preference. RSRI Discussion Paper Series, no. 38. Philadelphia, Pa.: Regional Science Research Institute.
19. Sanoff, H. 1969. Visual attributes of the physical environment. InK. Coates and K. Moffett (eds.), Response to Environment. Student Publication of the School of Design, vol. 18. Raleigh: North Carolina State University. Pp. 37-62.
20. Shafer, E. I., Jr., Hamilton, J. F., Jr., and Schmidt, E. A. 1969. Natural landscape preferences: A predictive model. Journal of Leisure Research 1:1-19.
21. Sonnenfeld, J. 1969. Equivalence and distortion of the perceptual environment. Environment and Behavior 1:83-100.
22. Thiel, P. A. 1961. A sequence-experience notation for architectural and urban space. Town Planning Review 32:33-52.
23. Thiel, P. A. 1965. Notes on environmental space and elementary space notation. Seattle: University of Washington Press.