Did phillips change anything?: Empirical analysis of the federal circuit’s claim construction jurisprudence

Intellectual Property and the Common Law

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 123-150

  Wagner, R Polk ^a   Petherbridge, Lee ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

^b LOYOLA LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925649920     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013550.008     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. Rochelle Cooper Dreyfuss, The Federal Circuit: A Case Study in Specialized Courts, 64 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1 (1989).
2. R. Polk Wagner & Lee Petherbridge, Is the Federal Circuit Succeeding? An Empirical Assessment of Judicial Performance, 152 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1105 (2004).
3. Giles Sutherland Rich, Extent of Protection and Interpretation of Claims – American Perspectives, 21 Int’l Rev. Indus. Prop. & Copyright L. 497, 499 (1990)
4. William H. Burgess, Simplicity at the Cost of Clarity: Appellate Review of Claim Construction and the Failed Promise of Cybor, 153 U. Penn L. Rev. 763 (2004).
5. John F. Duffy, On Improving the Legal Process of Claim Interpretation: Administrative Alternatives, 2 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol’y 109 (2000)
6. Craig Allen Nard, Process Considerations in the Age of Markman and Mantras, 2001 U. Ill. L. Rev. 355 (2001)
7. Christian A. Chu, Empirical Analysis of the Federal Circuit’s Claim Construction Trends, 16 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1075 (2001).
8. Lee Petherbridge & R. Polk Wagner, The Federal Circuit and Patentability: An Empirical Assessment of the Law of Obviousness, 85 Tex. L. Rev 2051 (2007)
9. Edward L. Rubin, The Concept of Law and the New Public Scholarship, 89 Mich. L. Rev. 792, 801 (1991).
10. R. Polk Wagner, Phillips Analysis, Part 1: The New Rule is There are No Rules, PolkWagner.com (July 15, 2005), at http://www.law.upenn.edu/blogs/polk/archives/2005/07/phillips analys.html.
11. Bruce L. Hay & Kathryn E. Spier, Settlement of Litigation, in 3 New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law 442, 443 (Peter Newman ed., 1998)
12. George L. Priest & Benjamin Klein, The Selection of Disputes for Litigation, 13 J. Legal Stud. 1, 16 (1984).
13. Giles S. Rich, Extent of Protection and Interpretation of Claims – American Perspectives, 21 Int’l Rev. Indus. Prop. & Copyright L. 497, 499 (1990)
14. R. Coase, The Problem of Social Cost, 3 J. Law & Econ. 1 (1960)
15. R. Polk Wagner, Reconsidering Estoppel: Prosecution History and the Failure of Festo, 151 U. Pa. L. Rev. 159, 222–25
16. R. Polk Wagner, Of Patents and Path- Dependency: A Comment on Burk and Lemley, 18 Berkeley Tech. L. J. 1, 18–20
17. Kimberly A. Moore, Forum Shopping in Patent Cases: Does Geographic Choice Affect Innovation, 79 N.C. L. Rev. 889, 928 (2001)