메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 11, Issue 8, 2013, Pages

Scientific Opinion on Priority topics for the development of risk assessment guidance by EFSA's Scientific Committee
[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

guidance; guidance document; risk assessment

Indexed keywords


EID: 84925648120     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18314732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3345     Document Type: Note
Times cited : (2)

References (33)
  • 3
    • 84886792683 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies on a request from the Commission relating to the evaluation of allergenic foods for labelling purposes
    • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2004. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies on a request from the Commission relating to the evaluation of allergenic foods for labelling purposes. The EFSA Journal, 32, 1–197.
    • (2004) The EFSA Journal , vol.32 , pp. 1-197
  • 4
    • 85078373403 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Opinion of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA related to exposure assessment
    • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2005. Opinion of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA related to exposure assessment. The EFSA Journal, 249, 1–26.
    • (2005) The EFSA Journal , vol.249 , pp. 1-26
  • 5
    • 44749086017 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidance of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA related to Uncertainties in Dietary Exposure Assessment
    • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) 2006. Guidance of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA related to Uncertainties in Dietary Exposure Assessment. The EFSA Journal, 438, 1–54.
    • (2006) The EFSA Journal , vol.438 , pp. 1-54
  • 6
    • 44749086017 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidance of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA related to Uncertainties in Dietary Exposure Assessment
    • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2006. Guidance of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA related to Uncertainties in Dietary Exposure Assessment. The EFSA Journal, 438, 1–54.
    • (2006) The EFSA Journal , vol.438 , pp. 1-54
  • 7
    • 41849127739 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Opinion related to the potential increase of consumer health risk by a possible increase of the existing maximum levels for aflatoxins in almonds, hazelnuts and pistachios and derived products
    • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2007. Opinion related to the potential increase of consumer health risk by a possible increase of the existing maximum levels for aflatoxins in almonds, hazelnuts and pistachios and derived products. The EFSA Journal, 446, 1–127.
    • (2007) The EFSA Journal , vol.446 , pp. 1-127
  • 8
    • 85078388895 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2012. EFSA Science Strategy 2012–2016. Available at: www.efsa.europa.eu/en/corporate/pub/sciencestrategy12.htm
    • (2012) EFSA Science Strategy 2012–2016
  • 9
    • 77956928672 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for Birds & Mammals on request from EFSA
    • 2009, 1438
    • EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR), 2009. Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for Birds & Mammals on request from EFSA. EFSA Journal 2009;7 (12):1438, 358 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1438
    • (2009) EFSA Journal , vol.7 , Issue.12 , pp. 358
  • 10
    • 84890804155 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Transparency in risk assessment - Scientific Aspects. Guidance of the Scientific Committee on Transparency in the Scientific Aspects of Risk Assessments carried out by EFSA. Part 2: General Principles
    • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2009. Transparency in risk assessment - Scientific Aspects. Guidance of the Scientific Committee on Transparency in the Scientific Aspects of Risk Assessments carried out by EFSA. Part 2: General Principles. The EFSA Journal, 1051, 1–22.
    • (2009) The EFSA Journal , vol.1051 , pp. 1-22
  • 11
    • 77149171287 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidance of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA on the use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment
    • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2009. Guidance of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA on the use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment. The EFSA Journal 2009, 1150, 1–72.
    • (2009) The EFSA Journal 2009 , vol.1150 , pp. 1-72
  • 12
    • 84888442809 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Scientific Report of EFSA on Evaluation of the FoodEx, the food classification system applied to the development of the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database
    • 2011, 1970
    • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2011. Scientific Report of EFSA on Evaluation of the FoodEx, the food classification system applied to the development of the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database. EFSA Journal 2011:9 (3):1970, 27 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.1970
    • (2011) EFSA Journal , vol.9 , Issue.3 , pp. 27
  • 13
    • 85049298975 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidance for submission for food additives evaluations
    • 2010, 2760
    • EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS), 2012. Guidance for submission for food additives evaluations. EFSA Journal:2010;10 (7):2760, 60 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2760
    • (2012) EFSA Journal , vol.10 , Issue.7 , pp. 60
  • 14
    • 79955794098 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants
    • 2010, 1879
    • EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), 2010. Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants. EFSA Journal 2010;8 (11):1879, 111 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1879
    • (2010) EFSA Journal , vol.8 , Issue.11 , pp. 111
  • 15
    • 85062149570 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Revision of the joint AFC/BIOHAZ guidance document on the submission of data for the evaluation of the safety and efficacy of substances for the removal of microbial surface contamination of foods of animal origin intended for human consumption
    • 2010, 1544
    • EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), 2010. Revision of the joint AFC/BIOHAZ guidance document on the submission of data for the evaluation of the safety and efficacy of substances for the removal of microbial surface contamination of foods of animal origin intended for human consumption. EFSA Journal 2010;8 (4):1544, 32 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1544
    • (2010) EFSA Journal , vol.8 , Issue.4 , pp. 32
  • 16
    • 78449254022 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidance on a harmonised framework for pest risk assessment and the identification and evaluation of pest risk management options by EFSA
    • 2010, 1495
    • EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH), 2010. Guidance on a harmonised framework for pest risk assessment and the identification and evaluation of pest risk management options by EFSA. EFSA Journal 2010;8 (2):1495, 66 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1495
    • (2010) EFSA Journal , vol.8 , Issue.2 , pp. 66
  • 17
    • 85054237318 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Scientific Opinion on the assessment of allergenicity of GM plants and microorganisms and derived food and feed
    • 2010, 1700
    • EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), 2010. Scientific Opinion on the assessment of allergenicity of GM plants and microorganisms and derived food and feed. EFSA Journal 2010;8 (7):1700, 168 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1700
    • (2010) EFSA Journal , vol.8 , Issue.7 , pp. 168
  • 18
    • 84926159425 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidance for the preparation of dossiers for coccidiostats and histomonostats
    • 2011, 2174
    • EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP), 2011. Guidance for the preparation of dossiers for coccidiostats and histomonostats. EFSA Journal 2011;9 (5):2174, 12 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2174
    • (2011) EFSA Journal , vol.9 , Issue.5 , pp. 12
  • 19
    • 85062008976 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidance for the preparation of dossiers for sensory additives
    • 2012, 2534
    • EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP), 2012. Guidance for the preparation of dossiers for sensory additives. EFSA Journal 2012;10 (1):2534, 26 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2534
    • (2012) EFSA Journal , vol.10 , Issue.1 , pp. 26
  • 20
    • 85078384038 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidance for the preparation of dossiers for nutritional additives
    • 2012, 2535
    • EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP), 2012. Guidance for the preparation of dossiers for nutritional additives. EFSA Journal 2012;10 (1):2535, 14 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2535
    • (2012) EFSA Journal , vol.10 , Issue.1 , pp. 14
  • 21
    • 85078396926 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidance for the preparation of dossiers for zootechnical additives
    • 2012, 2536
    • EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP), 2012. Guidance for the preparation of dossiers for zootechnical additives. EFSA Journal 2012;10 (1):2536, 19 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2536
    • (2012) EFSA Journal , vol.10 , Issue.1 , pp. 19
  • 22
    • 85078367054 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidance for the preparation of dossiers for technological additives
    • 2528
    • EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP), 2012. Guidance for the preparation of dossiers for technological additives. EFSA Journal 2012; 10 (1):2528, 23 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2528
    • (2012) EFSA Journal 2012; , vol.10 , Issue.1 , pp. 23
  • 23
    • 85070940480 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Scientific opinion on the development of specific protection goal options for environmental risk assessment of pesticides, in particular in relation to the revision of the Guidance Documents on Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecotoxicology (SANCO/3268/2001 and SANCO/10329/2002)
    • 2010, 1821
    • EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR), 2010. Scientific opinion on the development of specific protection goal options for environmental risk assessment of pesticides, in particular in relation to the revision of the Guidance Documents on Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecotoxicology (SANCO/3268/2001 and SANCO/10329/2002). EFSA Journal 2010;8 (10):1821, 55 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1821
    • (2010) EFSA Journal , vol.8 , Issue.10 , pp. 55
  • 24
    • 84964732826 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of plant pests
    • 2011, 2460
    • EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH), 2011. Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of plant pests. EFSA Journal 2011;9 (12):2460, 121 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2460
    • (2011) EFSA Journal , vol.9 , Issue.12 , pp. 121
  • 25
    • 85053203545 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Statistical Significance and Biological Relevance
    • 2011, 2372
    • EFSA Scientific Committee, 2011. Statistical Significance and Biological Relevance. EFSA Journal 2011;9 (9):2372, 17 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2372
    • (2011) EFSA Journal , vol.9 , Issue.9 , pp. 17
  • 26
    • 85026296547 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Scientific Opinion on Risk Assessment Terminology
    • 2012, 2664
    • EFSA Scientific Committee, 2012. Scientific Opinion on Risk Assessment Terminology. EFSA Journal 2012;10 (5):2664, 43 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2664
    • (2012) EFSA Journal , vol.10 , Issue.5 , pp. 43
  • 27
    • 85067778894 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Scientific Opinion on the hazard assessment of endocrine disruptors: Scientific criteria for identification of endocrine disruptors and appropriateness of existing test methods for assessing effects mediated by these substances on human health and the environment
    • 3132, 2013
    • EFSA Scientific Committee, 2013. Scientific Opinion on the hazard assessment of endocrine disruptors: Scientific criteria for identification of endocrine disruptors and appropriateness of existing test methods for assessing effects mediated by these substances on human health and the environment. EFSA Journal 2013;11 (3):3132, 84 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3132
    • (2013) EFSA Journal , vol.11 , Issue.3 , pp. 84
  • 28
    • 84873858545 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Environmental health crucial to food safety
    • p
    • Hulme PE, 2013. Environmental health crucial to food safety. Science, 339 (6119), p 522.
    • (2013) Science , vol.339 , Issue.6119 , pp. 522
    • Hulme, P.E.1
  • 29
    • 79960304704 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Uncertainty and data quality in exposure assessment
    • Harmonization Project Document 6., World Health Organisation
    • IPCS (International Programme on Chemical Safety), 2008. Uncertainty and data quality in exposure assessment. Part 1: Guidance document on characterizing and communicating uncertainty in exposure assessment. Harmonization Project Document No. 6. World Health Organisation.
    • (2008) Part 1: Guidance document on characterizing and communicating uncertainty in exposure assessment
  • 32
    • 84922689326 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Main achievements and challenges of the EFSA Scientific Committee since its inception
    • 2012;,)s1001
    • Silano V, Knapp A, Lovell D and Liem D, 2012. Main achievements and challenges of the EFSA Scientific Committee since its inception. EFSA Journal 2012;10 (10):s1001, 11 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.s1001
    • (2012) EFSA Journal , vol.10 , Issue.10 , pp. 11
    • Silano, V.1    Knapp, A.2    Lovell, D.3    Liem, D.4


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.