Hospital Volume and Cardiac Complications of Endomyocardial Biopsy: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 9508 Adult Patients Using a Nationwide Inpatient Database in Japan

Clinical Cardiology

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 164-170

  Isogai, Toshiaki ^a,b   Yasunaga, Hideo ^a   Matsui, Hiroki ^a   Ueda, Tetsuro ^c   Tanaka, Hiroyuki ^b   Horiguchi, Hiromasa ^d   Fushimi, Kiyohide ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b TOKYO METROPOLITAN TAMA MEDICAL CENTER   (Japan)

^c Tokyo Metropolitan Health and Medical Treatment Corporation   (Japan)

^d NATIONAL HOSPITAL ORGANIZATION   (Japan)

^e TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CONGESTIVE CARDIOMYOPATHY; DATA BASE; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HEART MUSCLE BIOPSY; HEART PACING; HIGH VOLUME HOSPITAL; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; JAPAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERICARDIOCENTESIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; FACTUAL DATABASE; HEART DISEASES; HEART MUSCLE; IMAGE GUIDED BIOPSY; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; LOW VOLUME HOSPITAL; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODDS RATIO; PATHOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARDIAC PACING, ARTIFICIAL; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HEART DISEASES; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HOSPITALS, HIGH-VOLUME; HOSPITALS, LOW-VOLUME; HUMANS; IMAGE-GUIDED BIOPSY; INPATIENTS; JAPAN; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; MYOCARDIUM; ODDS RATIO; PERICARDIOCENTESIS; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84925615338     PISSN: 01609289     EISSN: 19328737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/clc.22368     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. From AM, Maleszewski JJ, Rihal CS,. Current status of endomyocardial biopsy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011; 86: 1095-1102.
2. Cooper LT, Baughman KL, Feldman AM, et al. The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the European Society of Cardiology. Circulation. 2007; 116: 2216-2233.
3. Sakakibara S, Konno S,. Endomyocardial biopsy. Jpn Heart J. 1962; 3: 537-543.
4. Bulloch RT, Murphy ML, Pearce MB,. Intracardiac needle biopsy of the ventricular septum. Am J Cardiol. 1965; 16: 227-233.
5. Richardson PJ,. King's endomyocardial bioptome. Lancet. 1974; 1: 660-661.
6. Kawai C, Kitaura Y,. New endomyocardial biopsy catheter for the left ventricle. Am J Cardiol. 1977; 40: 63-65.
7. Ragni T, Martinelli L, Goggi C, et al. Echo-controlled endomyocardial biopsy. J Heart Transplant. 1990; 9: 538-542.
8. Deckers JW, Hare JM, Baughman KL,. Complications of transvenous right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy in adult patients with cardiomyopathy: a seven-year survey of 546 consecutive diagnostic procedures in a tertiary referral center. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992; 19: 43-47.
9. Baraldi-Junkins C, Levin HR, Kasper EK, et al. Complications of endomyocardial biopsy in heart transplant patients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1993; 12 (1 part 1): 63-67.
10. Drury JH, Labovitz AJ, Miller LW,. Echocardiographic guidance for endomyocardial biopsy. Echocardiography. 1997; 14: 469-474.
11. Starling RC, Van Fossen DB, Hammer DF, et al. Morbidity of endomyocardial biopsy in cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1991; 68: 133-136.
12. Holzmann M, Nicko A, Kühl U, et al. Complication rate of right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy via the femoral approach: a retrospective and prospective study analyzing 3048 diagnostic procedures over an 11-year period. Circulation. 2008; 118: 1722-1728.
13. Yilmaz A, Kindermann I, Kindermann M, et al. Comparative evaluation of left and right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy: differences in complication rate and diagnostic performance. Circulation. 2010; 122: 900-909.
14. Paul M, Stypmann J, Gerss J, et al. Safety of endomyocardial biopsy in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: a study analyzing 161 diagnostic procedures. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011; 4: 1142-1148.
15. Saraiva F, Matos V, Gonc¸alves L, et al. Complications of endomyocardial biopsy in heart transplant patients: a retrospective study of 2117 consecutive procedures. Transplant Proc. 2011; 43: 1908-1912.
16. Chimenti C, Frustaci A,. Contribution and risks of left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy in patients with cardiomyopathies: a retrospective study over a 28-year period. Circulation. 2013; 128: 1531-1541.
17. Hiramitsu S, Hiroe M, Uemura A, et al. National survey of the use of endomyocardial biopsy in Japan. Jpn Circ J. 1998; 62: 909-912.
18. Sekiguchi M, Take M,. World survey of catheter biopsy of the heart. In:, Sekiguchi M, Olsen EG, eds. Cardiomyopathy: Clinical, Pathological and Theoretical Aspects. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press, 1980: 217-225.
19. Deshmukh A, Patel NJ, Pant S, et al. In-hospital complications associated with catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the United States between 2000 and 2010: analysis of 93 801 procedures. Circulation. 2013; 128: 2104-2112.
20. Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H, Matsuda S, et al. Relationship between hospital volume and operative mortality for liver resection: data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. Hepatol Res. 2012; 42: 1073-1080.
21. Sumitani M, Uchida K, Yasunaga H, et al. Prevalence of malignant hyperthermia and relationship with anesthetics in Japan: data from the diagnosis procedure combination database [published correction appears in Anesthesiology. 2011;114:1257]. Anesthesiology. 2011; 114: 84-90.
22. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005; 43: 1130-1139.
23. Hubbard AE, Ahern J, Fleischer NL, et al. To GEE or not to GEE: comparing population average and mixed models for estimating the associations between neighborhood risk factors and health. Epidemiology. 2010; 21: 467-474.
24. Kitamura S., Heart transplantation in Japan: a critical appraisal for the results and future prospects. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012; 60: 639-644.
25. Yoshida A, Ishibashi-Ueda H, Yamada N, et al. Direct comparison of the diagnostic capability of cardiac magnetic resonance and endomyocardial biopsy in patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2013; 15: 166-175.
26. Baccouche H, Mahrholdt H, Meinhardt G, et al. Diagnostic synergy of non-invasive cardiovascular magnetic resonance and invasive endomyocardial biopsy in troponin-positive patients without coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2009; 30: 2869-2879.
27. Friedrich MG, Sechtem U, Schulz-Menger J, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in myocarditis: a JACC White Paper. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 53: 1475-1487.