The authors reply: Balancing between benefit and harm-What is the best solution in fluid resuscitation?

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2015, Pages e27-e28

  Raghunathan, Karthik ^a   Beadles, Christopher ^a   Nathanson, Brian H ^a   Lindenauer, Peter K ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED PROTEIN C; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; BALANCED SALT SOLUTION; CHLORIDE; ISOTONIC SOLUTION; LACTIC ACID; SODIUM; STEROID;

ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; ERYTHROCYTE TRANSFUSION; FLUID RESUSCITATION; FLUID THERAPY; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; HYPERCHLOREMIA; INTENSIVE CARE; LETTER; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; METABOLIC ACIDOSIS; MORTALITY; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESUSCITATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SEPSIS; CRITICAL ILLNESS; PROCEDURES;

CRITICAL ILLNESS; FLUID THERAPY; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; ISOTONIC SOLUTIONS; SEPSIS;

EID: 84925611473     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: 15300293     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000697     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Schultz MJ: Balancing Between Benefit and Harm-What Is the Best Solution in Fluid Resuscitation? Crit Care Med 2015; 43:e26-e27
2. Raghunathan K, Shaw A, Nathanson B, et al: Association between the choice of IV crystalloid and in-hospital mortality among critically ill adults with sepsis. Crit Care Med 2014; 42:1585-1591
3. Gunnerson KJ: The meaning of acid-base abnormalities in the intensive care unit-epidemiology. Crit Care 2005; 9:508-516
4. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, et al: International Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med 2008; 36:296-327