Valuing nature: The challenge of the national environmental legacy act

Beyond Environmental Law: Policy Proposals for a Better Environmental Future

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 81-108

  Brown, Mark T ^a   Angelo, Mary Jane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925609851     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511802591.005     Document Type: Chapter

References (26)

1. H.T. Odum, Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making (1995).
2. H.T. Odum’s Contributions to Quantifying and Understanding Systems, 78(1–2) Ecological Modeling 201–13 (2004).
3. E.P. Odum (with H.T. Odum), Fundamentals of Ecology (1953).
4. D. Scienceman, Energy and Emergy, in Environmental Economics: The Analysis of a Major Interface 257–76 (G. Pillet & T. Murota eds. 1987).
5. M.T. Brown & S. Ulgiati, Emergy Evaluation of Natural Capital and Biosphere Services, 28(6) Ambio 1 (1999).
6. C.P. Stickney & R. L. Weil, Financial Accounting: An Introduction to Concepts, Methods, and Uses (10th ed. 2003).
7. D. Campbell, Financial Accounting Methods to Further Develop and Communicate Environmental Accounting Using Emergy, in Emergy Synthesis 3: Theory and Application of the Emergy Methodology – Proceedings of the 3rd Biennial Emergy Conference 185–198 (M.T. Brown ed. 2005).
8. Gaylord Nelson, The Bankruptcy Files, Wilderness Vol. 57, Issue 205 (Summer 1994), 10.
9. Cutler J. Cleveland C et al., Natural Resource Quality, in Encyclopedia of Earth (Robert Costanza & Cutler J. Cleveland eds. 2007), available at http://www. eoearth.org/article/Natural resource quality.
10. M.T. Brown &E. Campbell, Evaluation of Natural Capital and Environmental Services of U.S. National Forests Using Emergy Synthesis: Final Contract Report toUSDAForest Service under Cooperative Agreement Number 05-DG- 11120101–019 (2007).
11. Sidney A. Shapiro & Robert L. Glicksman, Risk Regulation at Risk: Restoring a Pragmatic Approach (2003);
12. Daniel A. Farber, Eco-pragmatism: Making Sensible Environmental Decisions in an Uncertain World (1999).
13. James Salzman, Barton Thompson & Gretchen Dailey, Protecting Environmental Services: Science, Economics, and Law, 20 Stan. Envtl. L.J. 309-311 (2001).
14. John M. Heyde, Is Contingent Valuation Worth the Trouble? 62 U. Chi. L. Rev. 331 (1995)
15. Herman E. Daly & Joshua Farley, Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications (Island Press 2004). Salzman et al., supra note 21;
16. G.C. Daily et al., The Value of Nature and the Nature of Value, 289 Science 395–96 (2000);
17. J.B. Ruhl & James Salzman, The Law and Policy Beginnings of Ecosystem Services, 22 J. Land Use & Envtl. L. 2 (2007).
18. Jorge L. Hau & Bhavik R. Bakshi, Promise and Problems of Emergy Analysis, 178 ECOLOGICAL MODELING 215-216 (2004).
19. R.U. Ayres, Ecology vs. Economics: Confusing Production and Consumption, Center of the Management of Environmental Resources (INSEAD 1998);
20. C.J. Cleveland, R.K. Kaufmann & D.I. Stern, Aggregation and the Role of Energy in the Economy, 32 Ecological Econ. 301–17 (2000);
21. B.A. Mansson & J.M. McGlade, Ecology, Thermodynamics and H.T. Odum’s Conjectures, 93 Oecologia 582–96 (1993);
22. D.T. Spreng, Net-EnergyAnalysis and the Energy Requirements of Energy Systems 289 (1988).
23. M.T. Brown & A. Buenfil, Emergy Synthesis as a Tool for Evaluating Management Options for Fresh Water in Africa, in Aquatic Conservation and Management in Africa (T.L. Crisman, L.J. Chapman, C.A. Chapman & L. Kaufman eds. 2002).
24. M.T. Brown & S. Ulgiati, Emergy Measures of Carrying Capacity to Evaluate Economic Investments, 22(5) Population and Environment 471–501 (2001).
25. M.T. Brown & T. McClanahan, Emergy Analysis Perspectives for Thailand and Mekong River Dam Proposal, 91 Ecological Modeling 105–30 (1996).
26. J.B. Ruhl, Working Both (Positivist) Ends Toward a New (Pragmatic) Middle in Environmental Law, 68 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. (2000) (book review). Farber, supra note 20, at 151–52.