Full-waveform seismic inversion using the source-receiver compression approach

Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Exposition and 80th Annual Meeting 2010, SEG 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1023-1028

  Habashy, T M ^a   Abubakar, A ^a   Pan, G ^a   Belani, A ^a  

^a SCHLUMBERGER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING; SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION;

COMPRESSION APPROACH; COMPUTATIONAL TIME AND MEMORY; EFFECT OF NOISE; FULL-WAVEFORM INVERSION; FULL-WAVEFORMS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS; SEISMIC INVERSION; SIMULTANEOUS SOURCES;

DATA REDUCTION;

EID: 84925604696     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1190/1.3513021     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Abubakar, A., T. M. Habashy, V. Druskin, L. Knizhnerman, and D. Alumbaugh, 2008, 2.5D forward and inverse modeling for interpreting low-frequency electromagnetic measurements: Geophysics, 73, no. 4, F165–F177, doi:10.1190/1.2937466.
2. Abubakar, A., W. Hu, T. M. Habashy, and P. M. van den Berg, 2009, Application of the finite-difference contrast-source inversion algorithm to seismic full-waveform data: Geophysics, 74, no. 6, WCC47, doi:10.1190/1.3250203.
3. Abubakar, A., P. M. van den Berg, and J. T. Fokkema, 2003, Towards non-linear inversion for characterization of time-lapse phenomena through numerical modelling: Geophysical Prospecting, 51, no. 4, 285–293, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2478.2003.00369.x.
4. Ben-Hadj-Ali, H., S. Operto, and J. Virieux, 2009, Efficient 3D frequency-domain full waveform inversion (FWI) with phase encoding:71st EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, P004.
5. Golub, G. H., and C. F. van Loan, 1996, Matrix computations, third edition: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
6. Habashy, T. M., and A. Abubakar, 2004, A general framework for constraint minimization for the inversion of electromagnetic measurements: Progress in Electromagnetic Research, 46, 265–312, doi:10.2528/PIER03100702.
7. Herrmann, F. J., Y. Erlangga, and T. T. Y. Lin, 2009, Compressive sensing applied to fullwave form inversion:71st EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, S016.
8. Hu, W., A. Abubakar, and T. M. Habashy, 2009a, Preconditioned non-linear conjugate gradient method for seismic full-waveform inversion: 71st EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, U018.
9. Hu, W., A. Abubakar, and T. M. Habashy, 2009b, Simultaneous multifrequency inversion of full-waveform seismic data: Geophysics, 74, no. 2, R1–R14, doi:10.1190/1.3073002.
10. Krebs, J., J. Anderson, D. Hinkley, R. Neelamani, S. Lee, A. Baumstein, and M. D. Lacasse, 2009, Fast full-wavefield seismic inversion using encoded sources: Geophysics, 74, no. 6, WCC177, doi:10.1190/1.3230502.
11. Marfurt, K. J., 1984, Accuracy of finite-difference and finite-element modeling of the scalar and elastic wave-equations: Geophysics, 49, 533–549, doi:10.1190/1.1441689.
12. Mora, P., 1987, Nonlinear two-dimensional elastic inversion of multioffset seismic data: Geophysics, 52, 1211–1228, doi:10.1190/1.1442384.
13. Morton, S. A., and C. C. Ober, 1998, Faster shot-record depth migrations using phase encoding, in Extended Abstracts, 1131–1134, SEG Annual Meeting.
14. Operto, S., J. Virieux, P. Amestoy, J.-Y. L’Excellent, L. Giraud, and H. B. H. Ali, 2007, 3D finite-difference frequency-domain modeling of visco-acoustic wave propagation using a massively parallel direct solver: A feasibility study: Geophysics, 72, no. 5, SM195–SM211, doi:10.1190/1.2759835.
15. Plessix, R. E., 2007, A Helmholtz iterative solver for 3D seismic-imaging problems: Geophysics, 72, no. 5, SM185–SM194, doi:10.1190/1.2738849.
16. Pratt, R. G., 1999, Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain, part 1: Theory and verification in a physical scale model: Geophysics, 64, 888–901, doi:10.1190/1.1444597.
17. Pratt, R. G., C. Shin, and G. J. Hicks, 1998, Gauss-Newton and full Newton methods in frequency-space seismic waveform inversion: Geophysical Journal International, 133, no. 2, 341–362, doi:10.1046/j.1365-246X.1998.00498.x.
18. Pratt, R. G., and M. H. Worthington, 1990, Inverse theory applied to multi-source cross-hole tomography. part 1: Acoustic wave-equation method: Geophysical Prospecting, 38, no. 3, 287–310, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.1990.tb01846.x.
19. Press, W. H., S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, 1992, Numerical recipes in Fortran: the art of scientific computing: Cambridge University Press.
20. Romero, L. A., D. C. Ghiglia, C. C. Ober, and S. A. Morton, 2000, Phase encoding of shot records in prestack migration: Geophysics, 65, 426–436, doi:10.1190/1.1444737.
21. Shin, C., K. Yoon, K. J. Marfurt, K. Park, D. Yang, H. Y. Lim, S. H. Chung, and S. Shin, 2001, Efficient calculation of a partial derivative wavefield using reciprocity for seismic imaging and inversion: Geophysics, 66, 1856–1863, doi:10.1190/1.1487129.
22. Vigh, D., and E. W. Starr, 2008, 3D prestack plane-wave full-waveform inversion: Geophysics, 73, no. 5, VE135–VE144, doi:10.1190/1.2952623.
23. Virieux, J., S. Operto, H. B. H. Ali, R. Brossier, V. Etienne, F. Sourbier, L. Giraud, and A. Haidar, 2009, Seismic wave modeling for seismic imaging: The Leading Edge, 28, no. 5, 538–544, doi:10.1190/1.3124928.