Erratum: Removal performance of elemental mercury by low-cost adsorbents prepared through facile methods of carbonization and activation of coconut husk (Waste Management and Research (2015) 33 (81-88) DOI: 10.1177/0734242X14562660);Removal performance of elemental mercury by low-cost adsorbents prepared through facile methods of carbonisation and activation of coconut husk

Waste Management and Research

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 81-88

  Johari, Khairiraihanna ^a   Alias, Afidatul Shazwani ^a   Saman, Norasikin ^a   Song, Shiow Tien ^a   Mat, Hanapi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED CARBON; CARBONIZATION; CHEMICAL ACTIVATION; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; GAS ADSORPTION; PACKED BEDS; POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

ACTIVATION PROCESS; ADSORPTION CAPACITIES; CARBON ADSORBENTS; ELEMENTAL MERCURY; LOW-COST ADSORBENTS; NITROGEN ADSORPTION DESORPTION; PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES; REMOVAL PERFORMANCE;

MERCURY (METAL);

ACTIVATED CARBON; ADSORBENT; MERCURY; NITROGEN; POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE; CHARCOAL; HYDROXIDE; POTASSIUM DERIVATIVE;

ACTIVATED CARBON; ADSORPTION; DESORPTION; EVERGREEN TREE; HYDROXIDE; MERCURY (ELEMENT); POLLUTANT REMOVAL;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; CARBONIZATION; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; COCONUT; DESORPTION; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SYNTHESIS; WASTE DISPOSAL; CHEMISTRY; ECONOMICS; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

ADSORPTION; CHARCOAL; COCOS; HYDROXIDES; MERCURY; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NITROGEN; POTASSIUM COMPOUNDS; SPECTROSCOPY, FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84925597051     PISSN: 0734242X     EISSN: 10963669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0734242X15589877     Document Type: Erratum

References (40)

1. Agamuthu P (2013) Mercury-The real story. Waste Management & Research 31: 233-234.
2. Cai J, Shen B, Li Z, et al. (2014) Removal of elemental mercury by clays impregnated with KI and KBr. Chemical Engineering Journal 241: 19-27.
3. Da Costa Castro CDP, Faria JAF and Dantas TBH (2012) Testing the use of coconut fiber as a cushioning material for transport packaging. Material Science Applied 3: 151-156.
4. Eckersley N (2010) Advanced mercury removal technologies. Hydrocarbon Technology 29-35.
5. El Ela MA, Mahgoub IS, Nabawi MH, et al. (2s008) Mercury monitoring and removal at gas-processing facilities: Case study of Salam gas plant. Society of Petroleum Engineers 3: 1-9.
6. Fuente-Cuesta A, Diaz-Somoano M, Lopez-Anton MA, et al. (2012) Biomass gasification chars for mercury capture from a simulated flue gas of coal combustion. Journal Environmental Management 98: 23-28.
7. Gao Y, Zhang Z, Wu J, et al. (2013) A critical review on the heterogenous catalytic oxidation of elemental mercury in flue gases. Environmental Science & Technology 47: 10813-10823.
8. 2 materials. Energy Fuels 27: 4832-4839.
9. Hsi HC, Rood MJ, Rostam-Abadi M, et al. (2002) Mercury adsorption properties of sulfur-impregnated adsorbents. Journal Environmental Engineering 128 (11): 1080-1089.
10. Hsi HC, Tsai CY, Kuo TH, et al. (2011) Development of low-concentration mercury adsorbents from biohydrogen-generation agricultural residues using sulfur impregnation. Bioresource Technology 102: 7470-7477.
11. Hu C, Zhou J, He S, et al. (2009) Effect of chemical activation of an activated carbon using zinc chloride on elemental mercury adsorption. Fuel Processing Technology 90: 812-817.
12. Johari K, Saman N and Mat H (2014a) Adsorption enhancement of elemental mercury onto sulfur functionalized silica gel adsorbents. Environmental Technology 35: 629-636.
13. Johari K, Saman N, Song ST, et al. (2013) Utilization of coconut milk processing waste as a low-cost mercury sorbent. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 52: 15648-15657.
14. Johari K, Saman N, Song ST, et al. (2014b) Study on Hg (II) removal from aqueous solution using lignocellulosic coconut fiber biosorbents-Equilibrium and kinetic evaluation. Chemical Engineering Communications 201: 1198-1220.
15. Karatza D, Lancia A, Prisciandaro M, et al. (2013) Influence of oxygen on adsorption of elemental mercury vapors onto activated carbon. Fuel 111: 485-491.
16. Kiselev AV (1968) Adsorption properties of hydrophobic surfaces. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 28: 430-442.
17. Lee JY, Ju Y, Keener TC, et al. (2006) Development of cost effective noncarbon sorbents for HgO removal from coal-fired power plants. Environmental Science Technology 40: 2714-2721.
18. Lee S and Park Y (2003) Gas phase mercury removal by carbon-based sorbents. Fuel Processing Technology 84: 197-206.
19. Li J and Maroto-Valer MM (2012) Computational and experimental studies of mercury adsorption on unburned carbon present in fly ash. Carbon 50: 1913-1924.
20. Li YH, Lee CW and Gullet BK (2003) Importance of activated carbon's oxygen surface functional groups on elemental mercury adsorption. Fuel 82: 451-457.
21. Makkuni A, Bachas LG, Varma RS, et al. (2005) Aqueous and vapor phase mercury sorption by inorganic oxide materials functionalized with thiols and poly-thiols. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 7: 87-96.
22. Matsumura Y (1974) Adsorption of mercury vapor on the surface of activated carbons modified by oxidation or iodization. Atmospheric Environment 8: 1321-1327.
23. McBeath AV, Smernik RJ, Schneider MPW, et al. (2011) Plant EL Determination of the aromaticity and the degree of aromatic condensation of a thermosequence of wood charcoal using NMR. Organic Chemistry 42: 1194-1202.
24. Meyer DE, Sikdar SK, Hutson ND, et al. (2007) Examination of sulfurfunctionalized, copper-doped iron nanoparticles for vapor-phase mercury capture in entrained-flow and fixed-bed systems. Energy Fuels 21: 2688-2697.
25. Morán JI, Alvarez VA, Cyras VP, et al. (2008) Extraction of cellulose and preparation of nanocellulose from sisal fibers. Cellulose 15: 149-159.
26. Padak B, Brunetti M, Lewis A, et al. (2006) Mercury binding on activated carbon. Environmental Progress 25: 319-326.
27. Prabhu SR and Thomas GV (2002) Biological conversion of coir pith into a value-added organic resource and its application in Agri-Horticulture: Current status, prospects and perspective. Journal of Plantation Crops 30: 1-17.
28. Reddy KSK, Al Shoaibi A and Srinivasakannan C (2014) Elemental mercury adsorption on sulfur-impregnated porous carbon-A review. Environmental Technology 35: 18-26.
29. Rout J, Tripathy SS, Nayak SK, et al. (2001) Scanning electron microscopy study of chemically modified coir fibers. Journal Applied Polymer Science 79: 1169-1177.
30. Saman N, Johari K, Song ST, et al. (2014) Removal of Hg(II) and CH3Hg(I) using rasped pith sago residue (RPSR) biosorbent. Clean-Soil Air Water Pollution. 42(11): 1541-1548.
31. Sharma YC, Uma SN and Upadhyay SN (2009) Removal of a cationic dye from wastewater by adsorption on activated carbon developed from coconut coir. Energy Fuels 23: 2983-2988.
32. Skodras G, Diamantopoulou I, Pantoleontos G, et al. (2008) Kinetic studies of elemental mercury adsorption in activated carbon fixed bed reactor. Journal Hazardous Material 158: 1-13.
33. Song ST, Saman N, Johari K, et al. (2013a) Removal of Hg(II) from aqueous solution by adsorption using raw and chemically modified rice straw as novel adsorbents. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 52: 13092-13101.
34. Song ST, Saman N, Johari K, et al. (2013b) Removal of mercury (II) from aqueous solution by using rice residues. Jurnal Teknologi (Science Engineering) 63: 67-73.
35. Sun C, Snape CE and Liu H (2013) Development of low-cost functional adsorbents for control of mercury (Hg) emissions from coal combustion. Energy Fuels 27: 3875-3882.
36. Sunanda Tiwari DP, Sharma DN and Kumar RTS (2013) Sapindus based activated carbon by chemical activation. Research Journal Material Science 1: 9-15.
37. Tan Z, Qiu J, Zeng H, et al. (2011) Removal of elemental mercury by bamboo charcoal impregnated with H2O2. Fuel 90: 1471-1475.
38. Tan Z, Sun L, Xiang J, et al. (2012) Gas-phase elemental mercury removal by novel carbon-based sorbents. Carbon 50: 362-371.
39. Ucol-Ganiron JRT (2013) Recycling of waste coconut shells as substitute for aggregates in mix proportioning of concrete hollow blocks. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development 9: 290-300.
40. Wade LG, Jr (2006) Organic Chemistry. 6th ed. New Jersey, USA: Pearson Prentice Hall.