The public value of controversial art: The case of the sensation exhibit

Beyond Price: Value in Culture, Economics, and the Arts

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 270-282

  Brooks, Arthur C ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925586738     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511793820.017     Document Type: Chapter

References (9)

1. Bennett, William. 2000. The Humanities, the Universities, and Public Policy. In Gigi Bradford, Michael Gray, and Glenn Wallach, eds., The Politics of Culture: Policy Perspectives for Individuals, Institutions, and Communities, 226-235. New York: The New Press.
2. Bhabha, Homi. 2001. The Subjunctive Mood of Art. In L. Rothfield, ed., Unsettling “Sensation”: Arts Policy Lessons from the Brooklyn Museum of Art Controversy, 93-95. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
3. Brooks, Arthur C. 2004. In Search of True Public Arts Support. Public Budgeting & Finance24(2): 88-100.
4. Frey, Bruno S. 1997. Evaluating Cultural Property: The Economic Approach. International Journal of Cultural Property6(2): 231-246.
5. Himmelfarb, Gertrude. 1999. One Nation, Two Cultures. New York: Knopf.
6. Lewis, Gregory B., and Arthur C. Brooks. 2005. A Question of Morality: Artists’ Values and Public Funding for the Arts. Public Administration Review65(1): 8-17.
7. McCarthy, Kevin F., Arthur Brooks, Julia F. Lowell, and Laura Zakaras. 2001. The Performing Arts in a New Era. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
8. McCarthy, Kevin F., Elizabeth H. Ondaatje, Laura Zakaras, and Arthur Brooks. 2004. Gifts of the Muse: Reframing the Debate about the Benefits of the Arts. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
9. Rothfield, Lawrence. 2001. Introduction: The Interests in “Sensation.” In Lawrence Rothfield, ed., Unsettling “Sensation”: Arts Policy Lessons from the Brooklyn Museum of Art Controversy, 1-14. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.