A randomized trial of social media from Circulation

Circulation

Volumn 131, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 28-33

  Fox, Caroline S ^a   Bonaca, Marc A ^a,b   Ryan, John J ^a,c   Massaro, Joseph M ^a,d   Barry, Karen ^a   Loscalzo, Joseph ^a,b  

^a Department of Medicine Harvard Medical School Brigham and Women's Hospital ^*  (United States)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Randomized controlled trials; Social media

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTHOR; CIRCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; MEDICAL LITERATURE; POPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANK SUM TEST; SCIENCE; SEASON; SOCIAL MEDIA; UNITED STATES; BIOASSAY; INTERNET; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PUBLICATION; RANDOMIZATION; TRENDS; WRITING;

AUTHORSHIP; ENDPOINT DETERMINATION; HUMANS; INTERNET; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SOCIAL MEDIA; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84925582099     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: 15244539     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.013509     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Eysenbach G. Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13:e123.
2. Evans P, Krauthammer M. Exploring the use of social media to measure journal article impact. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011;2011:374-381.
3. Liu CL, Xu YQ, Wu H, Chen SS, Guo JJ. Correlation and interaction visualization of altmetric indicators extracted from scholarly social network activities: Dimensions and structure. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:e259.
4. Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivière V, Sugimoto CR. Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS One. 2013;8:e64841.
5. Kwok R. Research impact: Altmetrics make their mark. Nature. 2013;500:491-493.
6. Perneger TV. Relation between online "hit counts" and subsequent citations: prospective study of research papers in the BMJ. BMJ. 2004;329:546-547.
7. Quade D. Rank Analysis of Covariance. J Am Stat Assoc. 1967;62:1187-1200.
8. Hodges JL, Lehmann EL. Estimates of location based on rank tests. Ann Math Statist. 1963;34:598-611.
9. Allen HG, Stanton TR, Di Pietro F, Moseley GL. Social media release increases dissemination of original articles in the clinical pain sciences. PLoS One. 2013;8:e68914.
10. Yan KK, Gerstein M. The spread of scientific information: Insights from the web usage statistics in PLoS article-level metrics. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19917.