Female tubal sterilization: The time has come to routinely consider removal

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 124, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 596-599

  Creinin, Mitchell D ^a   Zite, Nikki ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANADA; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CAUTERIZATION; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTRACEPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; ENDOMETRIUM CELL; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); MORBIDITY; OPERATION DURATION; OVARY CANCER; OVARY CARCINOMA; OVARY FUNCTION; PATIENT COUNSELING; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK REDUCTION; SALPINGECTOMY; SALPINGOOOPHORECTOMY; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; UTERINE TUBE; UTERINE TUBE LIGATION; UTERINE TUBE STERILIZATION; VAGINAL DELIVERY; ADULT; CONTRACEPTION; OVARIAN NEOPLASMS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SELECTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, ECTOPIC; PROCEDURES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGERY;

ADULT; CONTRACEPTION; FALLOPIAN TUBES; FEMALE; HUMANS; OVARIAN NEOPLASMS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SELECTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, ECTOPIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; SALPINGECTOMY; STERILIZATION, TUBAL;

EID: 84925546016     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000422     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Mosher WD, Jones J. Use of contraception in the United States, 1982-2008. Vital Health Stat 23 2010; 29:1-44.
2. Borrero S, Moore CG, Qin L, Schwarz E.B., Akers A., Creinin MD, et al. Unintended pregnancy influences racial disparity in tubal sterilization rates. J Gen Intern Med 2010; 25:122-8.
3. Chan LM, Westhoff CL Tubal sterilization trends in the US. Fertil Steril 2010; 94:1-6.
4. Peterson HB, Xia Z, Hughes J.M., Wilcox LS, Tylor LR, Trussell J. The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174:1161-8.
5. Penfield AJ. The Filshie clip for female sterilization: a review of world experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182:485-9.
6. Gariepy A, Creinin MD, Smith K.J., Xu X. Probability of pregnancy after sterilization: a comparison of hysteroscopic versus laparoscopic sterilization. Contraception 2014 28 April 2014 (epub ahead of print).
7. Chakravarti S, Shardlow J. Tubal pregnancy after sterilization. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1975; 82:58-60.
8. Erickson BK, Conner MG, Landen CN Jr. The role of the fallopian tube in the origin of ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209:409-14.
9. Jarboe EA, Miron A, Carlson J.W., Hirsch MS, Kindelberger D, Mutter GL, et al Coexisting intraepithelial serous carcinomas of the endometrium and fallopian tube: frequency and potential significance. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2009; 28:308-15.
10. Przybycin CG, Kurman RJ, Ronnett B.M., Shih IeM, Vang R Are all pelvic (nonuterine) serous carcinomas of tubal origin? Am J Surg Pathol 2010; 34:1407-16.
11. Cibula D, Widschwendter M, Zikan M., Dusek L. Underlying mechanisms of ovarian cancer risk reduction after tubal ligation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011; 90:559-63.
12. Cibula D, Widschwendter M, Majek O., Dusek L. Tubal ligation and the risk of ovarian cancer: review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2011; 17:55-67.
13. Sieh W, Salvador S, McGuire V., Weber RP, Rossing MA, Risch H, et al Tubal ligation and risk of ovarian cancer subtypes: a pooled analysis of case-control studies. Int J Epidemiol 2013; 42:579-89.
14. Lessard-Anderson CMR St Sauver J, Weaver A, Bakkum-Gamez J, Dowdy S, Cliby B. The impact of tubal sterilization techniques on the risk of serous ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma: a Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) study. Gyncol Oncol 2013; 130:e25-6.
15. Kamran MW, Vaughan D, Crosby D., Wahab NA, Saadeh FA, Gleeson N. Opportunistic and interventional salpingectomy in women at risk: a strategy for preventing pelvic serous cancer (PSC). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013; 170:251-4.
16. Kwon JS, Tinker A, Pansegrau G., McAlpine J, Housty M, McCullum M., et al. Prophylactic salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy as an alternative for BRCA mutation carriers. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121:14-24.
17. Schenberg T, Mitchell G. Prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy as a prevention strategy in women at high-risk of ovarian cancer: a mini-review. Front Oncol 2014; 4:21.
18. McAlpine JN, Hanley GE, Woo M.M., Tone AA, Rozenberg N, Swenerton KD, et al Opportunistic salpingectomy: uptake, risks, and complications of a regional initiative for ovarian cancer prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210:471. e1-11.
19. Bollapragada SS, Bandyopadhyay S, Serie E., Baird C. Spontaneous pregnancy after bilateral salpingectomy. Fertil Steril 2005; 83:767-8.
20. Curtis KM, Mohllajee AP, Peterson HB Regret following female sterilization at a young age: a systematic review. Contraception 2006; 73:205-10.
21. Finer LB, Jerman J, Kavanaugh ML Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007-2009. Fertil Steril 2012; 98:893-7.