Design and performance study of hybrid photocatalytic reactor-PVDF/MWCNT nanocomposite membrane system for treatment of petroleum refinery wastewater

Desalination

Volumn 363, Issue , 2015, Pages 99-111

  Moslehyani, A ^a   Ismail, A F ^a   Othman, M H D ^a   Matsuura, T ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

MWCNTs; Nanocomposite membrane; Photocatalytic degradation; TiO2

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CARBON NANOTUBES; FILTRATION; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; HYBRID SYSTEMS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MEMBRANES; MICROFILTRATION; MULTIWALLED CARBON NANOTUBES (MWCN); NANOCOMPOSITES; ORGANIC POLLUTANTS; POLLUTION; REFINING; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STRUCTURAL DESIGN; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; WASTEWATER TREATMENT; YARN;

ATOMIC ADSORPTION SPECTROMETERS; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS SPECTROMETRIES (GC-MS); MWCNTS; NANO-COMPOSITE MEMBRANES; PETROLEUM REFINERY WASTEWATERS; PHOTO CATALYTIC DEGRADATION; TIO;

PERMEATION;

EID: 84925518001     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.01.044     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Kaštánek F., Kaštánek P. Combined decontamination processes for wastes containing PCBs. J. Hazard. Mater. 2005, 117:185-205.
2. Chakrabarty B., Ghoshal A.K., Purkait M.K. Ultrafiltration of stable oil-in-water emulsion by polysulfone membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 325:427-437.
3. Abdullah A.R. Environmental pollution in Malaysia: trends and prospects. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 1995, 14:191-198.
4. Yatsufusa T., Kumura T., Nakagawa Y., Kidoguchi Y. Advantage of using water-emulsified fuel on combustion and emission characteristics. Fuel 2009, 5:600.
5. Dobson R.S., Burgess J.E. Biological treatment of precious metal refinery wastewater: a review. Miner. Eng. 2007, 20:519-532.
6. Diya'uddeen B.H., Daud W.M.A.W., Abdul Aziz A. Treatment technologies for petroleum refinery effluents: a review. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2011, 89:95-105.
7. Knight R.L., Kadlec R.H., Ohlendorf H.M. The use of treatment wetlands for petroleum industry effluents. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33:973-980.
8. Chakrabarty B., Ghoshal A.K., Purkait M.K. Cross-flow ultrafiltration of stable oil-in-water emulsion using polysulfone membranes. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 165:447-456.
9. Avci A., Kaçmaz M., Durak I.l. Peroxidation in muscle and liver tissues from fish in a contaminated river due to a petroleum refinery industry. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2005, 60:101-105.
10. 2 deposition in a membrane photocatalytic reactor (MPR) used for dye wastewater treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 203-204:348-356.
11. Affam A.C., Kutty S.R.M., Chaudhuri M. Solar photo-fenton induced degradation of combined chlorpyrifos, cypermethrin and chlorothalonil pesticides in aqueous solution. Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 2012, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology.
12. Zhang H., Lv X., Li Y., Wang Y., Li J. P25-graphene composite as a high performance photocatalyst. ACS Nano 2009, 4:380-386.
13. 2 as an efficient and reusable heterogeneous catalyst for the synthesis of 5-substituted 1H-tetrazoles. J. Nat. Sci. Res. 2012, 1:10-17.
14. 2 nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134:6575-6578.
15. Mozia S. Photocatalytic membrane reactors (PMRs) in water and wastewater treatment. A review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 73:71-91.
16. Asatekin A., Mayes A.M. Oil industry wastewater treatment with fouling resistant membranes containing amphiphilic comb copolymers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:4487-4492.
17. Yuliwati E., Ismail A.F. Effect of additives concentration on the surface properties and performance of PVDF ultrafiltration membranes for refinery produced wastewater treatment. Desalination 2011, 273:226-234.
18. Hami M.L., Al-Hashimi M., Al-Doori M. Effect of activated carbon on BOD and COD removal in a dissolved air flotation unit treating refinery wastewater. Desalination 2007, 216:116-122.
19. 2 photocatalysts in drinking water treatment. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40:1712-1719.
20. Yuliwati E., Ismail A.F., Matsuura T., Kassim M.A., Abdullah M. Effect of modified PVDF hollow fiber submerged ultrafiltration membrane for refinery wastewater treatment. Desalination 2011, 283:214-220.
21. Zhong J., Sun X., Wang C. Treatment of oily wastewater produced from refinery processes using flocculation and ceramic membrane filtration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2003, 32:93-98.
22. Jamshidi Gohari R., Lau W., Matsuura T., Halakoo E., Ismail A. Adsorptive removal of Pb(II) from aqueous solution by novel PES/HMO ultrafiltration mixed matrix membrane. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 120:59-68.
23. Jamshidi Gohari R., Lau W., Matsuura T., Ismail A. Fabrication and characterization of novel PES/Fe-Mn binary oxide UF mixed matrix membrane for adsorptive removal of As(III) from contaminated water solution. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 118:64-72.
24. 2 separation with mixed-matrix membranes made of water-stable MIL-101 and polysulfone. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48:2140-2142.
25. Ismail A.F., Hashemifard S.A., Matsuura T. Facilitated transport effect of Ag+ion exchanged halloysite nanotubes on the performance of polyetherimide mixed matrix membrane for gas separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 379:378-385.
26. Madaeni S.S., Zinadini S., Vatanpour V. Convective flow adsorption of nickel ions in PVDF membrane embedded with multi-walled carbon nanotubes and PAA coating. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 80:155-162.
27. Thomas J.A., McGaughey A.J. Reassessing fast water transport through carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2008, 8:2788-2793.
28. Sears K., Dumée L., Schütz J., She M., Huynh C., Hawkins S., Duke M., Gray S. Recent developments in carbon nanotube membranes for water purification and gas separation. Materials 2010, 3:127-149.
29. Yu M., Funke H.H., Falconer J.L., Noble R.D. High density, vertically-aligned carbon nanotube membranes. Nano Lett. 2008, 9:225-229.
30. Gaspar H., Pereira C., Rebelo S.L.H., Pereira M.F.R., Figueiredo J.L., Freire C. Understanding the silylation reaction of multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon 2011, 49:3441-3453.
31. Silva G.A., Parpura V. Nanotechnology for Biology and Medicine: At the Building Block Level 2011, Springer.
32. 2 surface chemistry to control and modulate photocatalytic performances. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 93:3360-3369.
33. Gaspar H., Pereira C., Rebelo S., Pereira M., Figueiredo J., Freire C. Understanding the silylation reaction of multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon 2011, 49:3441-3453.
34. Salager J., Morgan J., Schechter R., Wade W., Vasquez E. Optimum formulation of surfactant/water/oil systems for minimum interfacial tension or phase behavior. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 1979, 19:107-115.
35. Wang Y., Cheng R., Liang L., Wang Y. Study on the preparation and characterization of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene? Carbon nanotubes composite fiber. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2005, 65:793-797.
36. Zhao N., He C., Li J., Jiang Z., Li Y. Study on purification and tip-opening of CNTs fabricated by CVD. Mater. Res. Bull. 2006, 41:2204-2209.
37. [George_Socrates]_Infrared_and_Raman_characteristi(BookFi.org)_2.pdf.
38. Vatanpour V., Madaeni S.S., Moradian R., Zinadini S., Astinchap B. Fabrication and characterization of novel antifouling nanofiltration membrane prepared from oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotube/polyethersulfone nanocomposite. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 375:284-294.
39. Le Berre O., Daufin G. Skim milk crossflow microfiltration performance versus permeation flux to wall shear stress ratio. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 117:261-270.