Technology structural implications from the extension of a patent search method

Scientometrics

Volumn 102, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 1965-1985

  Benson, Christopher L ^a   Magee, Christopher L ^a  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

Author keywords

Patent searching; Technological relatedness; Technology decomposition

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925512283     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1493-2     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alberts, D., Yang, C. B., Fobare-deponio, D., Koubek, K., Robins, S., Rodgers, M., et al. (2011). In M. Lupu, K. Mayer, J. Tait, & A. J. Trippe (Eds.), Current challenges in patent information retrieval (Vol. 29). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19231-9
2. Arthur, W. B. (2007). The structure of invention. Research Policy,36(2), 274–287. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.11.005.
3. Benson, C. L. (2014). Cross-domain comparison of quantitative technology improvement using patent derived characteristics. New York: MIT.
4. Benson, C. L., & Magee, C. L. (2013). A hybrid keyword and patent class methodology for selecting relevant sets of patents for a technological field. Scientometrics,1(1), 1–12. doi:10.5539/emr.v1n1p2.
5. Benson, C., & Magee, C. L. (2014). On improvement rates for renewable energy technologies: Solar PV, wind turbines, capacitors, and batteries. Renewable energy. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148114001451.
6. Bower, J. L., & Christensen, C. M. (1995). Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. Harvard Business Review1, 43–53.
7. Choi, J., & Hwang, Y. (2013). Patent keyword network analysis for improving technology development efficiency. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,83, 170–182.
8. Cockburn, I., & Griliches, Z. (1987). Industry effects and appropriability measures in the stock market’s valuation of R&D and patents. Worker paper no. 2468. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
9. Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy,11(3), 147–162. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6.
10. EPO & USPTO. (2014). Cooperative patent classification—Objectives. http://www.cooperativepatentclassification.org/obj.html.
11. Evenson, R., & Putnam, J. (1988). The Yale-Canada patent flow concordance. Yale University, Economic Growth Centre Working Paper.
12. Fogel, R. W. (1964). Railroads ad American economic growth: Essays in econometric history. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Press.
13. Gilfillan, S. C. (1935). Inventing the ship. Chicago: Follett Publishing Company.
14. Girifalco, L. A. (1991). Dynamics of technological change. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
15. Hunter, L. (1949). Steamships on the Western Rivers: An economic and technological history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Jacobsson, S., & Johnson, A. (2000). The diffusion of renewable energy technology: An analytical framework and key issues for research. Energy policy, 28(9), 625–640.
17. Levin, R. (1988). Appropriability, R&D spending, and technological performance. American Economic Review,78(2), 424–428.
18. Luan, C., Liu, Z., & Wang, X. (2013). Divergence and convergence: technology-relatedness evolution in solar energy industry. Scientometrics,97(2), 461–475. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1057-x.
19. Magee, C. L., Basnet, S., Funk, J. L., & Benson, C. L. (2014). Quantitative empirical trends in technical performance. MIT, ESD working paper ESD-WP-2014-22. http://esd.mit.edu/WPS/2014/esd-wp-2014-22.pdf.
20. Moeller, A., & Moehrle, M. G. (2014). Scientometrics,. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1446-9.
21. Mones, E., Pollner, P., & Vicsek, T. (2014). Universal hierarchical behavior of citation networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment,2014(5), 1–17.
22. Neij, L. (1997). Use of experience curves to analyse the prospects for diffusion and adoption of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy,23(97), 1099–1107.
23. Nelson, R. (1962). The link between science and invention: The case of the transistor (pp. 549–584). The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and Social Factors.
24. Park, H., Kim, K., Choi, S., & Yoon, J. (2013). A patent intelligence system for strategic technology planning. Expert Systems with Applications, 40, 2373–2390.
25. Passer, H. C. (1953). Electrical manufacturers: 1875–1900: A study in competition, entrepreneurhsip, and economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy,13(1984), 343–373.
27. Riordan, M., & Hoddeson, L. (1997). Crystal fire: The birth of the information age. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
28. Rosenberg, N. (1979). Technological interdependence in the American economy. Technology and Culture, 1, 25–50.
29. Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box: Technology and economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Schmoch, U. (2008). Concept of a technology classification for country comparison. Final report to the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/classifications/en/ipc_ce_41/ipc_ce_41_5-annex1.pdf.
31. Schmoch, U., Laville, F. Patel, P., & Freitsch, R. (2003). Linking technology areas to industrial sectors. Final report to the European commission, DG research. ftp://cordis.europa.eu/pub/indicators/docs/ind_report_isi_ost_spru.pdf.
32. Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,70(1), 65–94. doi:10.2307/1884513
33. Stefanov, V., & Tait, J. I. (2011). An introduction to contemporary search technology. In Current challenges in patent information retrieval (pp. 45–65). Berlin: Springer.
34. Tushman, M., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly,31(3), 439–465.
35. USPTO. (2014). Decription of patent types. http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/patdesc.htm.
36. Utterback, J. M., & Acee, H. J. (2005). Disruptive technologies: an expanded view. International Journal of Innovation Management,9(1), 1–17. doi:10.1142/S1363919605001162.
37. Verspagen, B., Morgastel, T. V., & Slabbers, M. (1994). MERIT concordance table: IPC—ISIC (rev. 2). Maastricht: MERIT Research Memorandum 2/94-004.