JSGE Clinical Practice Guidelines 2014: standards, methods, and process of developing the guidelines

Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 4-10

  Yoshida, Masahiro ^a   Kinoshita, Yoshikazu ^a   Watanabe, Mamoru ^a   Sugano, Kentaro ^a  

^a the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE)   (Japan)

Author keywords

Clinical Practice Guidelines 2014; Methodology; The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology

Indexed keywords

CHOLELITHIASIS; CHRONIC PANCREATITIS; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COCHRANE LIBRARY; COLORECTAL POLYP; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; CONSENSUS; CROHN DISEASE; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM FUNCTION DISORDER; DYSPEPSIA; GASTROENTEROLOGY; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; IRRITABLE COLON; JAPANESE (PEOPLE); LIVER CIRRHOSIS; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MEDLINE; NONALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER; PEPTIC ULCER; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); JAPAN; LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; STANDARDS;

CONFLICT OF INTEREST; GASTROENTEROLOGY; HUMANS; JAPAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 84925506053     PISSN: 09441174     EISSN: 14355922     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00535-014-1016-1     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Fukui T, Yamaguchi N, Morizane T, Yoshida M, Kojimahara N, editors. MINDS handbook for clinical practice guideline development 2014. Tokyo: Igaku-shoin; 2014.
2. Aihara M, Mihara H, Murayama T, Aihara T, Fukuda S. GRADE System for clinical practice guideline—therapeutic intervention. Hirosaki: Toppan-media; 2010.
3. The GRADE* working group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328:1490–4 (printed, abridged version).
4. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, GRADE Working Group, et al. Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924–6.
5. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, GRADE Working Group, et al. Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: what is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ. 2008;336:995–8.
6. Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J, GRADE Working Group, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ. 2008;336:1106–10.
7. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, GRADE working group, et al. Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:1170–3.
8. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, GRADE Working Group, et al. Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:1049–51.
9. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Dellinger P, GRADE working group, et al. Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive. BMJ. 2008;337:a744.
10. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl E, et al. GRADE guidelines 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:383–94.
11. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:295–400.
12. Balshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann HJ, et al. GRADE guidelines 3: rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:401–6.
13. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, et al. GRADE guidelines 4: rating the quality of evidence—study limitation (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:407–15.
14. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, et al. GRADE guidelines 5: rating the quality of evidence—publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1277–82.
15. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1283–93.
16. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, The GRADE Working Group, et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1294–302.
17. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, The GRADE Working Group, et al. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1303–10.
18. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S, The GRADE Working Group, et al. GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1311–6.
19. Brunetti M, Shemilt I, The GRADE Working, et al. GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66:140–50.
20. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Sultan S, et al. GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66:151–7.
21. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Santesso N, et al. GRADE guidelines 12. Preparing summary of findings tables binary outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66:158–72.
22. Thorlund K, Oxman AD, Walter SD, et al. GRADE guidelines 13. Preparing summary of findings tables-continuous outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(2):173–83.
23. Andrews J, Guyatt G, Oxman AD, et al. GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations. JCE. 2013;66(2):719–25.
24. Andrews JC, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, et al. GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation’s direction and strength. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(7):726–35.