Exploring consumer exposure pathways and patterns of use for chemicals in the environment

Toxicology Reports

Volumn 2, Issue , 2015, Pages 228-237

  Dionisio, Kathie L ^a   Frame, Alicia M ^a   Goldsmith, Michael Rock ^a,f   Wambaugh, John F ^a   Liddell, Alan ^b,g   Cathey, Tommy ^c   Smith, Doris ^a   Vail, James ^a   Ernstoff, Alexi S ^d   Fantke, Peter ^d   Jolliet, Olivier ^e   Judson, Richard S ^a  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c LOCKHEED MARTIN   (United States)

^d TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^f INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN IMMUNOLOGY AND CANCER   (Canada)

^g UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

Chemical exposure; Exposure prioritization; High throughput; Human exposure; Use category

Indexed keywords

DOMESTIC CHEMICAL; INDUSTRIAL CHEMICAL;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ACCIDENT; CHEMICAL ENVIRONMENT; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; CHEMICAL INTERACTION; CONSUMER; DATA BASE; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PRODUCT SAFETY; SCREENING;

EID: 84925499013     PISSN: 22147500     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2014.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ankley G., Bennett R., Erickson R., Hoff D., Hornung M., Johnson R., et al. Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2010, 29:730-741.
2. Dix D.J., Houck K.A., Martin M.T., Richard A.M., Setzer R.W., Kavlock R.J. The ToxCast program for prioritizing toxicity testing of environmental chemicals. Toxicol. Sci. 2007, 95:5-12.
3. Egeghy P.P., Judson R., Gangwal S., Mosher S., Smith D., Vail J., et al. The exposure data landscape for manufactured chemicals. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 414:159-166.
4. Goldsmith M.-R., Grulke C.M., Brooks R.D., Transue T.R., Tan Y.M., Frame A., et al. Development of a consumer product ingredient database for chemical exposure screening and prioritization. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2014, 65:269-279.
5. Judson R., Richard A., Dix D., Houck K., Elloumi F., Martin M., et al. ACToR - Aggregated Computational Toxicology Resource. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2008, 233:7-13.
6. Judson R., Richard A., Dix D.J., Houck K., Martin M., Kavlock R., et al. The toxicity data landscape for environmental chemicals. Environ. Health Perspect. 2009, 117:685-695.
7. Judson R.S., Houck K.A., Kavlock R.J., Knudsen T.B., Martin M.T., Mortensen H.M., et al. In vitro screening of environmental chemicals for targeted testing prioritization: the toxcast project. Environ. Health Perspect. 2010, 118:485-492.
8. Judson R.S., Martin M.T., Egeghy P., Gangwal S., Reif D.M., Kothiya P., et al. Aggregating data for computational toxicology applications: the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Aggregated Computational Toxicology Resource (ACToR) system. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13:1805-1831.
9. Kavlock R., Dix D. Computational toxicology as implemented by the U.S. EPA: providing high throughput decision support tools for screening and assessing chemical exposure, hazard and risk. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part B: Crit. Rev. 2010, 13:197-217.
10. Kavlock R., Chandler K., Houck K., Hunter S., Judson R., Kleinstreuer N., et al. Update on EPA's toxcast program: providing high throughput decision support tools for chemical risk management. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2012, 25:1287-1302.
11. Mitchell J., Arnot J.A., Jolliet O., Georgopoulos P.G., Isukapalli S., Dasgupta S., et al. Comparison of modeling approaches to prioritize chemicals based on estimates of exposure and exposure potential. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 458-460:555-567.
12. Price P.S., Chaisson C.F. A conceptual framework for modeling aggregate and cumulative exposures to chemicals. J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 2005, 15:473-481.
13. SPIN Spin substances in preparations in nordic countries 2013, Available: http://www.spin2000.net (accessed 9.07.13).
14. Tice R.R., Austin C.P., Kavlock R.J., Bucher J.R. Improving the human hazard characterization of chemicals: a Tox21 update. Environ. Health Perspect. 2013, 121:756-765.
15. U.S.Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Assessment: Guidance Manual (update) 2005, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, Georgia.
16. U.S.EPA Life Cycle Assessment: Principles and Practice 2006, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.
17. U.S.EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program: Universe of Chemicals and General Validation Principles 2012, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC.
18. Wambaugh J.F., Setzer R.W., Reif D.M., Gangwal S., Mitchell-Blackwood J., Arnot J.A., et al. High-throughput models for exposure-based chemical prioritization in the expocast project. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47:8479-8488.
19. Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., Shrivastava S., Hassanali M., Stothard P., et al. Drugbank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration. Nucl. Acids Res. 2006, 34:D668-D672.
20. Wishart D.S. Drugbank and its relevance to pharmacogenomics. Pharmacogenomics 2008, 9. 1166-1162.
21. Wishart D.S., Knox C., guo A.C., Cheng D., Shrivastava S., Tzur D., et al. Drugbank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets. Nucl. Acids Res. 2008, 36:D901-D906.