A Semi-Automated, Multi-Source Data Fusion Update of a Wetland Inventory for East-Central Minnesota, USA

Wetlands

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 335-348

  Kloiber, Steven M ^a   Macleod, Robb D ^b   Smith, Aaron J ^c   Knight, Joseph F ^d   Huberty, Brian J ^e  

^a MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES   (United States)

^b Great Lakes/Atlantic Regional Office   (United States)

^c Equinox Analytics Inc   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^e US Fish and Wildlife Service   (United States)

Author keywords

Accuracy assessment; Remote sensing; Wetland mapping; Wetlands inventory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925463042     PISSN: 02775212     EISSN: 19436246     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13157-014-0621-3     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Alaska Satellite Facility (2011) MapReady Remote Sensing Tool Kit Version 2.3.17 [computer software]. Available from https://www.asf.alaska.edu/data-tools/mapready/
2. Austin JE, Buhl TK, Guntenspergen GR, Norling W, Sklebar HT (2001) Duck populations as indicators of landscape condition in the prairie pothole region. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 69(1):29–48
3. Baatz M, Schäpe A (2000) Multiresolution segmentation: an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation. In: Strobl J, Blaschke T (eds) Angewandte geographische informationsverarbeitung XII. Wichmann, Heidelberg, pp 12–23
4. Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp (2011) Opticks Version 4.7.1. Available from http://opticks.org
5. Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ (1979) A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Journal 24(1):43–69
6. Bourgeau-Chavez LL, Kowalski KP, Carlson Mazur ML, Scarbrough KA, Powell RB, Brooks CN, Huberty B, Jenkins LK, Banda EC, Galbraith DM, Laubach ZM, Riordan K (2013) Mapping invasive phragmites Australis in the coastal great lakes with ALOS PALSAR satellite imagery for decision support. Journal of Great Lakes Research 39(1):65–77
7. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Machine Learning 45(1):5–32
8. Brisco B, Touzi R, Van der Sanden J, Charbonneau F, Pultz T, D’Iorio M (2008) Water resource applications with Radarsat-2. International Journal of Digital Earth 1(1):130–147
9. Burkett V, Kusler J (2000) Climate change: potential impacts and interactions in wetlands of the United States. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 36(2):313–320
10. Congalton RG, Green K (2008) Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. CRC press
11. Corcoran JM, Knight JF, Brisco B, Kaya S, Cull A, Murhnaghan K (2011) The integration of optical, topographic, and radar data for wetland mapping in northern Minnesota. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 27(5):564–582
12. Corcoran JM, Knight JF, Gallant AL (2013) Influence of multi-source and multi-temporal remotely sensed and ancillary data on the accuracy of random forest classification of wetlands in Northern Minnesota. Remote Sensing 5(7):3212–3238
13. Costa LT, Farinha JC, Vives PT, Hecker N, Silva EP (2001) Regional wetland inventory approaches: The Mediterranean example. In Wetland Inventory, Assessment and Monitoring: Practical Techniques and Identification of Major Issues. Finlayson CM, Davidson NC & Stevenson NJ (eds). Proceedings of Workshop 4, 2nd International Conference on Wetlands and Development, Dakar, Senegal, 8–14 November 1998, Supervising Scientist Report 161, Supervising Scientist, Darwin
14. Cowardin LM, Carter V, Golet FC, LaRoe ET (1979) Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Report No. FWS/OBS/-79/31, Washington
15. Dahl TE, Dick J, Swords J, Wilen BO (2009) Data collection requirements and procedures for mapping wetland, deepwater and related habitats of the United States. Division of habitat and resource conservation, national standards and support team. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Madison, p 85
16. Definiens AG (2009) Definiens eCognition developer 8 user guide. Definens AG, Munchen
17. Dost RJJ, Mannaerts CMM (2008) Generation of lake bathymetry using sonar, satellite imagery and GIS. In ESRI 2008: Proceedings of the 2008 ESRI International User Conference
18. Drazkowski B, May M, Herrera DT (2004) Comparison of 1983 and 1997 southern Michigan national wetland inventory data. Department of Environmental Quality, Geological and Land Management Division, Michigan, p 15
19. ERDAS (2008) ERDAS imagine version 9.2 [computer software]. Intergraph Corporation, Norcross
20. ERDAS (2010) StereoAnalyst for ArcGIS version 10.0 [computer software]. Intergraph Corporation, Norcross
21. ESRI (2011) ArcGIS desktop: release 10 [computer software]. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands
22. Euliss NH Jr, Gleason RA, Olness A, McDougal RL, Murkin HR, Robarts RD, Bourbonniere RA, Warner BG (2006) North American prairie wetlands are important nonforested land-based carbon storage sites. Science of the Total Environment 361(1):179–188
23. FGDC (2009) Wetlands mapping standard, Document number FGDC-STD-015-2009. US Geological Survey Federal Geographic Data Committee, Reston
24. Finlayson CM, Spiers AG (1999) Global review of wetland resources and priorities for wetland inventory. Supervising scientist report 144. Wetlands International Publication 53, Supervising Scientist, Canberra
25. Fournier RA, Grenier M, Lavoie A, Hélie R (2007) Towards a strategy to implement the Canadian wetland inventory using satellite remote sensing. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 33(S1):S1–S16
26. Frohn RC, Reif M, Lane C, Autrey B (2009) Satellite remote sensing of isolated wetlands using object-oriented classification of Landsat-7 data. Wetlands 29(3):931–941
27. Gong P, Niu ZG, Cheng X, Zhao KY, Zhou DM, Guo JH, Liang L, Wang XF, Li DD, Huang HB, Wang Y, Wang K, Li WN, Wang XW, Ying Q, Yang ZZ, Ye YF, Li Z, Zhuang DF, Chi YB, Zhou HZA, Yan J (2010) China’s wetland change (1990–2000) determined by remote sensing. Science China Earth Sciences 53(7):1036–1042
28. Guisan A, Weiss SB, Weiss AD (1999) GLM versus CCA spatial modeling of plant species distribution. Plant Ecology 143(1):107–122
29. Gwin SE, Kentula ME, Shaffer PW (1999) Evaluating the effects of wetland regulation through hydrogeomorphic classification and landscape profiles. Wetlands 19(3):477–489
30. Hepinstall JA, Queen LP, Jordan PA (1996) Application of a modified habitat suitability index model for moose. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 62(11):1281–1286
31. Hogg AR, Todd KW (2007) Automated discrimination of upland and wetland using terrain derivatives. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 33(S1):S68–S83
32. Irish JL, Lillycrop WJ (1999) Scanning laser mapping of the coastal zone: the SHOALS system. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 54(2):123–129
33. Kloiber SM, Gernes MC, Norris DJ, Flackey S, Carlson G (2012) Technical Procedures for the Minnesota Wetland Status and Trends Program: Wetland Quantity Assessment. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Ecological and Water Resources Report, November 2012. 41 pp. Retrieved from http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/eco/wetlands/wstmp_tech_procedures_2012.pdf
34. Knight JF, Tolcser B, Corcoran J, Rampi L (2013) The effects of data selection and thematic detail on the accuracy of high spatial resolution wetland classifications. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 79(7):613–623
35. Knutson MG, Sauer JR, Olsen DA, Mossman MJ, Hemesath LM, Lannoo MJ (1999) Effects of landscape composition and wetland fragmentation on frog and toad abundance and species richness in Iowa and Wisconsin, USA. Conservation Biology 13(6):1437–1446
36. Li J, Chen W (2005) A rule-based method for mapping Canada’s wetlands using optical, radar and DEM data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 26(22):5051–5069
37. LMIC (2007) Now called Minnesota Geographic Information Office Metadata for the National Wetlands Inventory, Minnesota. Retrieved from http://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/chouse/metadata/nwi.html
38. Macleod RD, Paige RS, Smith AJ (2013) Updating the National Wetland Inventory in East-Central Minnesota: Technical Documentation. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Ecological and Water Resources. St. Paul, MN. Retrieved from http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/eco/wetlands/nwi_ecmn_technical_documentation.pdf
39. Maidment DR (ed) (2002) Arc Hydro: GIS for water resources (Vol. 1). ESRI, Inc, Redlands
40. Marchand MN, Litvaitis JA (2004) Effects of habitat features and landscape composition on the population structure of a common aquatic turtle in a region undergoing rapid development. Conservation Biology 18(3):758–767
41. Minnesota Climatology Working Group (2012) 1981–2010 Normal Precipitation Maps. Retrieved from http://www.climate.umn.edu/doc/historical/81-10_precip_norm.htm
42. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (1999) Ecological Provinces. Retrieved from http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/natural_resources/ecs/province.pdf
43. MnGeo (2010) Map Accuracy Report: East-Central Minnesota Ortho Project. Minnesota Geographic Information Office, St. Paul, MN. Retrieved from http://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/chouse/airphoto/2010_DOQ_Accuracy_Report_MnDOT_ecmn2010_03Jan2012.pdf
44. Moore ID, Grayson RB, Ladson AR (1991) Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrological Processes 5:3–30
45. Munger JC, Gerber M, Madrid K, Carroll M, Petersen W, Heberger L (1998) U.S. National wetland inventory classifications as predictors of the occurrence of Columbia spotted frogs (Rana luteiventris) and pacific treefrogs (hylaregilla). Conservation Biology 12(2):320–330
46. Murphy PN, Ogilvie J, Connor K, Arp PA (2007) Mapping wetlands: a comparison of two different approaches for New Brunswick, Canada. Wetlands 27(4):846–854
47. Myint SW, Gober P, Brazel A, Grossman-Clarke S, Weng Q (2011) Per-pixel vs. object-based classification of urban land cover extraction using high spatial resolution imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment 115(5):1145–1161
48. NRCS (2010) Natural Resources Conservation Service, Soil Survey Staff, United States Department of Agriculture. Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database for [Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Goodhue, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Rice, Scott, Washington, and Wright Counties, Minnesota]. Retrieved from http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov/ on 01/12/2010
49. NSGIC (2014) Letter from President Kenneth Miller to the Secretary of Interior, Sally Jewell, April 16, 2014. National States Geographic Information Council
50. Ozesmi SL, Bauer ME (2002) Satellite remote sensing of wetlands. Wetlands Ecology and Management 10(5):381–402
51. R Development Core Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing, reference index version 2.12. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org
52. Rampi LP, Knight JF, Pelletier KC (2014a) Wetland mapping in the upper Midwest United States: an object-based approach integrating lidar and imagery data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 80(5):439–449
53. Rampi LP, Knight JF, Lenhart CF, (2014b) Comparison of flow direction algorithms in the application of the CTI for mapping wetlands in Minnesota. Wetlands, Feb. 2014
54. Tarboton DG (2003) Terrain analysis using digital elevation models in hydrology. In 23rd ESRI international users conference, San Diego, California (Vol. 14)
55. Tiner RW (1990) Use of high-altitude aerial photography for inventorying forested wetlands in the United States. Forest Ecology and Management 33:593–604
56. Tiner RW (2009) Status report for the national wetlands inventory program 2009. US fish and wildlife service. Branch of Resource and Mapping Support, Arlington
57. Trimble (2010) eCognition developer 8.64.0 user guide. Trimble, Munich, p 27
58. Yerkes T, Paige R, Macleod R, Armstrong L, Soulliere G, Gatti R (2007) Predicted distribution and characteristics of wetlands used by mallard pairs in five Great Lakes States. The American Midland Naturalist 157(2):356–364