The authors reply

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 372, Issue 13, 2015, Pages 1271-1272

  Hartmann, Lynn C ^a   Degnim, Amy C ^a   Dupont, William D ^b  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; ALGORITHM; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DENSITY; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER RISK; COHORT ANALYSIS; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FAMILY HISTORY; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; BREAST; FEMALE; PATHOLOGY;

BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84925440160     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1501046     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Tice JA, O'Meara ES, Weaver DL, Vachon C, Ballard-Barbash R, Kerlikowske K. Benign breast disease, mammographic breast density, and the risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2013;105:1043-9.
2. Chun J, El-Tamer M, Joseph KA, Ditkoff BA, Schnabel F. Predictors of breast cancer development in a high-risk population. Am J Surg 2006;192:474-7.
3. Work ME, Reimers LL, Quante AS, Crew KD, Whiffen A, Terry MB. Changes in mammographic density over time in breast cancer cases and women at high risk for breast cancer. Int J Cancer 2014;135:1740-4.
4. Ghosh K, Vachon CM, Pankratz VS, et al. Independent association of lobular involution and mammographic breast density with breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102:1716-23.