Reply to Comment on 'Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature'

Environmental Research Letters

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2015, Pages

  Cook, John ^a,b,c   Cowtan, Kevin ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b SKEPTICAL SCIENCE   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

climate change; consensus; global warming

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925424011     PISSN: 17489318     EISSN: 17489326     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/039002     Document Type: Note

References (4)

1. Cook J, Nuccitelli D, Skuce A, Way R, Jacobs P, Painting R, Honeycutt R, Green S A, Lewandowsky S and Coulter A 2014 24 Critical Errors in Tol (2014): Reaffirming the 97% Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming (http://sks.to/24errors)
2. Kottner J, Audigé L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski B J, Hróbjartsson A, Roberts C, Shoukri M and Streiner D L 2011 Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed J. Clin. Epidemiol. 64 96-106
3. Landis J R and Koch G G 1977 The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data Biometrics 33 159-74
4. Sim J and Wright C C 2005 The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements Phys. Ther. 85 257-68