Pursuing excellence in qualitative inquiry

Qualitative Psychology

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 49-60

  Gergen, Kenneth J ^a  

^a SWARTHMORE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

evaluating qualitative research; methodological pluralism; reflective pragmatism

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925401940     PISSN: 23263601     EISSN: 23263598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/qup0000002     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Bamberg, M. (2012). Narrative analysis. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA Handbook of research methods in psychology (pp. 77-94). Washington, DC: APA Press.
2. Barone, T., & Eisner, E. W. (2012). Arts based research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Chamberlain, K. (2000). Methodolatry and qualitative health research. Journal of Health Psychology, 5, 285-296. doi:10.1177/135910530000500306
4. Charmaz, K. (2005). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Clandinin, D. J. (Ed.). (2007). Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology. London, UK: Sage.
6. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7. Clarke, A. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Correa, F. P. (2013). The evaluation of qualitative research, A reflection from a justice perspective. Qualitative Inquiry, 19, 209-218. doi:10.1177/ 1077800412466225
9. Corti, L. (2004). Archival research. In M. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T. F. Liao (Eds.), The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods (pp. 21-22). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781412950589.n20
10. Daiute, C. (2014). Narrative inquiry: A dynamic approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511524059
12. Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (2000). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know (2nd ed). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
13. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Devers, K. J. (1999). How will we know "good" qualitative research when we see it?. Beginning the dialogue in health services research. Health Service Research, 34, 1153-1188.
15. Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T., & Rennie, D. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 215-229. doi: 10.1348/014466599162782
16. Fern, E. F. (2001). Advancing focus group research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2, 209-230. doi: 10.1177/146879410200200205
18. Flick, L. T. (2007). Designing qualitative research. London: Sage.
19. Fossey, E., Harvey, C., McDermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36, 717-732. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x
20. Frosh, S. (2007). Disintegrating qualitative research. Theory & Psychology, 17, 635-653. doi:10.1177/ 0959354307081621
21. Gadamer, H. G. (2004). Truth and method (2nd revised ed.). London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.
22. Gee, J. P. (Ed.). (2012). Routledge handbook of discourse analysis. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
23. Gergen, M. M., & Gergen, K. J. (2000). Qualitative inquiry: Generative tensions. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1025-1046). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24. Gergen, M. M., & Gergen, K. J. (2012). Playing with purpose: Adventures in performative social science. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
25. Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive psychological method in psychology. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
26. Gomm, R., Hammersley, M., & Foster, P. (Eds.). (2000). Case study method. London, UK: Sage.
27. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (2009). Analyzing narrative reality. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Halbertal, T. H., & Koren, I. (2006). Between "being" and "doing": Conflict and coherence in the identity formation of gay and lesbian Orthodox Jews. In D. P. McAdams, R. Josselson, & A. Lieblich (Eds.), Identity and story: Creating self in narrative (pp. 37-61). Washington, DC: APA Books. doi:10.1037/11414-002
30. Hammack, P. L., & Cohler, B. J. (2009). The story of sexual identity: Narrative perspectives on the gay and lesbian life course. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Horsburgh, D. (2003). Evaluation of qualitative research. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 12, 307-312. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00683.x
32. Jeanfreau, S. G., & Jack, L., Jr. (2010). Appraising qualitative research in health education: Guidelines for public health educators. Health Promotion Practice, 11, 612-617. doi:10.1177/1524839910363537
33. Johnstone, B. (2007). Discourse analysis. London, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
34. Jones, S. H., Adams, T. E., & Ellis, C. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
35. Josselson, R. (2013). Interviewing for qualitative inquiry: A relational approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
36. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37. Kvale, S. (1995). The social construction of validity. Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 19 - 40. doi:10.1177/ 107780049500100103
38. Lather, P. (1989). Fertile obsession: Validity after poststructuralism. Sociological Quarterly, 9, 243-276.
39. Lather, P. A., & Smithies, C. S. (1997). Troubling the angels: Women living with HIV/AIDS. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
40. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/ CBO9780511815355
41. Lawrence-Lightfoot, S., & Davis, J. H. (1997). The art and science of portraiture. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
42. Lietz, C. A., & Zayas, L. E. (2010). Evaluating qualitative research for social work practitioners. Advances in Social Work, 11, 188-202.
43. Marcus, G. E., & Fischer, M. M. J. (1986). Anthropology as culture critique. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
44. Maxwell, J. A. (2011). A realist approach for qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. Morse, J. M. (2003). A review committee's guide for evaluating qualitative proposals. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 833- 851. doi:10.1177/ 1049732303013006005
46. Poovey, M. (1998). A history of the modern fact: Problems of knowledge in the sciences of wealth and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226675183.001.0001
47. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2008). The Sage handbook of action research. London, UK: Sage.
48. Reicher, S. (2000). Against methodolatry: Some comments on Elliott, Fischer, and Rennie. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 1-6. doi: 10.1348/014466500163031
49. Riessman, C. K. (2007). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50. Saldaña, J. (2013). Fundamentals of qualitative research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
51. Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. E. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of discourse analysis. New York, NY: Wiley.
52. Shapes, L. (2011). Oral history. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 451-466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Shaughnessy, J. J., Zechmeister, E. B., & Zechmeister, J. S. (2009). Research methods in psychology (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
54. Smith, J. K., & Deemer, D. K. (2000). The problem of criteria in the age of relativism. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 877-896). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55. Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). London: Zed.
56. Sparkes, A. C. (2002). Autoethnography: Selfindulgence or something more?. In A. P. Bochner & C. Ellis (Eds.), Ethnographically speaking: Autoethnography, literature and aesthetics (pp. 209- 232). Thousand Oaks, CA: Altamira.
57. Upegui-Hernandez, D. (2012). "Because I'm neither Gringa nor Latina, because I am not any one thing": Conceptualizing multiple identities within transnational fields. In R. Josselson & M. Hathaway (Eds.), Navigating multiple identities: Race, gender, culture, and roles. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
58. van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4, 249- 283. doi:10.1177/0957926593004002006
59. Watkins, M., & Shulman, H. (2010). Toward psychologies of liberation. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
60. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
61. Wertz, F. J. (2011). The qualitative revolution in psychology. The Humanistic Psychologist, 39, 77- 104. doi:10.1080/08873267.2011.564531
62. Willig, C. (1999). Applied discourse analysis: Social and psychological interventions. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.