Effects of operating conditions and membrane structures on the performance of hollow fiber forward osmosis membranes in pressure assisted osmosis

Desalination

Volumn 365, Issue , 2015, Pages 381-388

  Shibuya, Masafumi ^a   Yasukawa, Masahiro ^a   Takahashi, Tomoki ^a   Miyoshi, Taro ^a   Higa, Mitsuru ^a,b   Matsuyama, Hideto ^a  

^a KOBE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b YAMAGUCHI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Forward osmosis (FO); Hollow fiber membrane; Improvement ratio (IR); Pressure assisted osmosis (PAO)

Indexed keywords

HYDROFLUORIC ACID; MEMBRANE STRUCTURES; MEMBRANES; WATER TREATMENT;

COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS; FORWARD OSMOSIS; FORWARD OSMOSIS MEMBRANES; HIGH PACKING DENSITY; HOLLOW FIBER MEMBRANES; IMPROVEMENT RATIO; LARGE SPECIFIC SURFACE AREAS; WATER TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES;

OSMOSIS MEMBRANES;

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; MEMBRANE; OSMOSIS; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PERMEABILITY; PRESSURE FIELD; WASTE TECHNOLOGY; WATER TECHNOLOGY; WATER TREATMENT;

EID: 84925364997     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. McCutcheon J.R., McGinnis R.L., Elimelech M. Desalination by ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis: influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 278:114-123.
2. McCutcheon J.R., McGinnis R.L., Elimelech M. A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process. Desalination 2005, 174:1-11.
3. Khawaji A.D., Kutubkhanah I.K., Wie J.M. Advances in seawater desalination technologies. Desalination 2008, 221:47-69.
4. Achilli A., Cath T.Y., Marchand E.A., Childress A.E. The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: a low fouling alternative to MBR processes. Desalination 2009, 239:10-21.
5. Holloway R.W., Childress A.E., Dennett K.E., Cath T.Y. Forward osmosis for concentration of anaerobic digester centrate. Water Res. 2007, 41:4005-4014.
6. Cornelissen E.R., Harmsen D., deKorte K.F., Ruiken C.J., Qin J.J., Oo H., Wessels L.P. Membrane fouling and process performance of forward osmosis membranes on activated sludge. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 319:158-168.
7. Achilli A., Cath T.Y., Childress A.E. Power generation with pressure retarded osmosis: an experimental and theoretical investigation. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 343:42-52.
8. She Q., Jin X., Tang C.Y. Osmotic power production from salinity gradient resource by pressure retarded osmosis: effects of operating conditions and reverse solute diffusion. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 401-402:262-273.
9. Lee K.L., Baker R.W., Lonsdale H.K. Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 1981, 8:141-171.
10. Loeb S. Large-scale power production by pressure-retarded osmosis, using river water and seawater passing through spiral modules. Desalination 2002, 143:115-122.
11. Yip N.Y., Tiraferri A., Phillip W.A., Schiffman J.D., Hoover L.A., Kim Y.C., Elimelech M. Thin-film composite pressure retarded osmosis membranes for sustainable power generation from salinity gradients. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:4360-4369.
12. Kim Y.C., Elimelech M. Adverse impact of feed channel spacers on the performance of pressure retarded osmosis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46:4673-4681.
13. Xie M., Nghiem L.D., Price W.E., Elimelech M. A forward osmosis-membrane distillation hybrid process for direct sewer mining: system performance and limitations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47:13486-13493.
14. Zhang Y., Pinoy L., Meesschaert B., Van der Bruggen B. A natural driven membrane process for brackish and wastewater treatment: photovoltaic powered ED and FO hybrid system. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47:10548-10555.
15. Qin J.-J., Kekre K.A., Oo M.H., Tao G., Lay C.L., Lew C.H., Cornelissen E.R., Ruiken C.J. Preliminary study of osmotic membrane bioreactor: effects of draw solution on water flux and air scouring on fouling. Water Sci. Technol. 2010, 62:8.
16. Thompson N.A., Nicoll P.G. Forward osmosis desalination: a commercial reality. IDAWC/PER11-198 2011.
17. Modern Water Membrane processes forward osmosis: desalination http://www.modernwater.com/assets/downloads/Factsheets/MW_Factsheet_Membrane_HIGHRES.pdf.
18. G. Carmignavi, S. Sitkiewitz, J.W. Webley, Recovery of retrograde soluble solute for forward osmosis water treatment. US patent 0267308 A1, 2012.
19. Lay W.C.L., Zhang Q., Zhang J., McDougald D., Tang C.Y., Wang R., Liu Y., Fane A.G. Study of integration of forward osmosis and biological process: membrane performance under elevated salt environment. Desalination 2011, 283:123-130.
20. Hau N.T., Chen S.-S., Nguyen N.C., Huang K.Z., Ngo H.H., Guo W. Exploration of EDTA sodium salt as novel draw solution in forward osmosis process for dewatering of high nutrient sludge. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 455:305-311.
21. Duong P.H.H., Chung T.-S. Application of thin film composite membranes with forward osmosis technology for the separation of emulsified oil-water. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 452:117-126.
22. NASA NASA showcases innovative method to grow algae based biofuels http://www.nasa.gov/centers/ames/news/features/2012/omega_algae_feature.html.
23. Glarer J. The early history of reverse osmosis membrane development. Desalination 1998, 117:297-309.
24. McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Modeling water flux in forward osmosis: implications for improved membrane design. AIChE J. 2007, 53:1736-1744.
25. Reali M., Dassie G., Jonsson G. Computation of salt concentration profiles in the porous substrate of anisotropic membranes under steady pressure-retarded-osmosis conditions. J. Membr. Sci. 1990, 48:181-201.
26. McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:237-247.
27. Tan C.H., Ng H.Y. Modified models to predict flux behavior in forward osmosis in consideration of external and internal concentration polarizations. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 324:209-219.
28. Park M., Lee J.J., Lee S., Kim J.H. Determination of a constant membrane structure parameter in forward osmosis processes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 375:241-248.
29. Tang C.Y., She Q., Lay W.C.L., Wang R., Field R., Fane A.G. Modeling double-skinned FO membranes. Desalination 2011, 283:178-186.
30. Hancock N.T., Xu P., Heil D.M., Bellona C., Cath T.Y. Comprehensive bench-and pilot-scale investigation of trace organic compounds rejection by forward osmosis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:8483-8490.
31. Tang C.Y., She Q., Lay W.C.L., Wang R., Fane A.G. Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 354:123-133.
32. Mi B., Elimelech M. Organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes: fouling reversibility and cleaning without chemical reagents. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 348:337-345.
33. Mi B., Elimelech M. Gypsum scaling and cleaning in forward osmosis: measurements and mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:2022-2028.
34. Mi B., Elimelech M. Chemical and physical aspects of organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 320:292-302.
35. Blandina G., Verliefde A.R.D., Tang C.Y., Childress A.E., Le-Clech P. Validation of assisted forward osmosis (AFO) process: impact of hydraulic pressure. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 447:1-11.
36. Oh Y., Lee S., Elimelech M., Lee S., Hong S. Effect of hydraulic pressure and membrane orientation on water flux and reverse solute flux in pressure assisted osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 465:159-166.
37. Duan J., Litwiller E., Pinnau I. Solution-diffusion with defects model for pressure-assisted forward osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 470:323-333.
38. Coday B.D., Heil D.M., Xu P., Cath T.Y. Effects of transmembrane hydraulic pressure on performance of forward osmosis membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47:2386-2393.
39. Blandin G., Verliefde A.R.D., Tang C.Y., Clech P.L. Opportunities to reach economic sustainability in forward osmosis-reverse osmosis hybrids for seawater desalination. Desalination 2015, 363:26-36.
40. Quintanilla V.Y., Li Z., Valladares R., Li Q., Amy G. Indirect desalination of Red Sea water with forward osmosis and low pressure reverse osmosis for water reuse. Desalination 2011, 280(1-3):160-166.
41. Itoh Y., Tokimi S., Yagi T., Ono M., Kumano A. Development of high performance CTA hollow-fiber RO module for wastewater reclamation. IDAWC/PER11-103, Perth, Western Australia, September 4-9 2011.
42. Shibuya M., Yasukawa M., Takahashi T., Miyoshi T., Higa M., Matsuyama H. Performance of cellulose triacetate hollow fiber forward osmosis membrane. Desalination 2015, 362:34-42.
43. Phillip W.A., Young J.S., Elimelech M. Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: modeling and experiments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:5170-5176.
44. Yong J.S., Phillip W.A., Elimelech M. Coupled reverse draw solute permeation and water flux in forward osmosis with neutral draw solutes. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 392-393:9-17.