Longer examination time improves detection of gastric cancer during diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 480-487.e2

  Teh, Jun Liang ^a   Tan, Jin Rong ^b   Lau, Linus Jian Fa ^b   Saxena, Nakul ^b,c   Salim, Agus ^d   Tay, Amy ^a   Shabbir, Asim ^a   Chung, Sydney ^a,b   Hartman, Mikael ^a,b,e   Bok Yan So, Jimmy ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM   (Singapore)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^c NATIONAL HEALTHCARE GROUP   (Singapore)

^d LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^e KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Early detection; Endoscopic; Stomach cancer; Tumor

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RISK; CHINESE; CLINICAL FEATURE; COHORT ANALYSIS; DYSPLASIA; ENDOSCOPIST; ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTESTINE METAPLASIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; SINGAPORE; STOMACH ATROPHY; STOMACH BIOPSY; STOMACH CANCER; STOMACH LESION; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; VERY ELDERLY; BIOPSY; CYTOCHEMISTRY; DIGESTIVE TRACT ENDOSCOPY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; STOMACH NEOPLASMS; TERTIARY CARE CENTER; TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; COHORT STUDIES; ENDOSCOPY, DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HISTOCYTOCHEMISTRY; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SINGAPORE; STOMACH NEOPLASMS; TERTIARY CARE CENTERS; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84925349461     PISSN: 15423565     EISSN: 15427714     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.07.059     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ferlay J., Shin H.R., Bray F., et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 2010, 127:2893-2917.
2. Cohen J., Safdi M.A., Deal S.E., et al. Quality indicators for esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006, 101:886-891.
3. Correa P. Ahuman model of gastric carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 1988, 48:3554-3560.
4. Genta R.M. Acid suppression and gastric atrophy: sifting fact from fiction. Gut 1998, 43(Suppl 1):S35-S38.
5. You W.C., Blot W.J., Li J.Y., et al. Precancerous gastric lesions in a population at high risk of stomach cancer. Cancer Res 1993, 53:1317-1321.
6. Cancer facts & figures2012 2012, 2012. American Cancer Society, American Cancer Society, Atlanta.
7. Leung W.K., Wu M.S., Kakugawa Y., et al. Screening for gastric cancer in Asia: current evidence and practice. Lancet Oncol 2008, 9:279-287.
8. Hallissey M.T., Allum W.H., Jewkes A.J., et al. Early detection of gastric cancer. BMJ 1990, 301:513-515.
9. Dan Y.Y., So J.B., Yeoh K.G. Endoscopic screening for gastric cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006, 4:709-716.
10. Blackshaw G.R., Barry J.D., Edwards P., et al. Open-access gastroscopy is associated with improved outcomes in gastric cancer. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003, 15:1333-1337.
11. Sasako M., Inoue M., Lin J.T., et al. Gastric Cancer Working Group report. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2010, 40(Suppl 1):i28-i37.
12. Yao K. The endoscopic diagnosis of early gastric cancer. Ann Gastroenterol 2012, 2012:1-12.
13. Gupta N., Gaddam S., Wani S.B., et al. Longer inspection time is associated with increased detection of high-grade dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 2012, 76:531-538.
14. Barclay R.L., Vicari J.J., Doughty A.S., et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. NEngl J Med 2006, 355:2533-2541.
15. Rex D.K., Petrini J.L., Baron T.H., et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 63:S16-S28.
16. Rey J.F., Lambert R., Committee E.Q.A. ESGE recommendations for quality control in gastrointestinal endoscopy: guidelines for image documentation in upper and lower GI endoscopy. Endoscopy 2001, 33:901-903.
17. Emura F.M.J., Mejía M., Osorio C., et al. Effectiveness of systematic chromoendoscopy for diagnosis of early cancer and gastric premalignant lesions: Results of two consecutive screening campaigns in Colombia (2006-2007). Revista Colombiana de Gastroenterologia 2010, 25:19-30.
18. Hosokawa O., Tsuda S., Kidani E., et al. Diagnosis of gastric cancer up to three years after negative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 1998, 30:669-674.
19. Amin A., Gilmour H., Graham L., et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma missed at endoscopy. JR Coll Surg Edinb 2002, 47:681-684.
20. Yalamarthi S., Witherspoon P., McCole D., et al. Missed diagnoses in patients with upper gastrointestinal cancers. Endoscopy 2004, 36:874-879.
21. Raftopoulos S.C., Segarajasingam D.S., Burke V., et al. Acohort study of missed and new cancers after esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2010, 105:1292-1297.
22. Howlader NNA, Krapcho M, Neyman N, etal (eds). SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2009 (vintage 2009 populations). Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. Available: based on November 2011 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April2012. Accessed May 13, 2013. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2009_pops09/.
23. Look M., Gao F., Low C.H., et al. Gastric cancer in Singapore. Gastric Cancer 2001, 4:219-222.
24. Carroll R.J., Carroll R.J. Measurement error in nonlinear models: a modern perspective 2006, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
25. de Vries A.C., van Grieken N.C., Looman C.W., et al. Gastric cancer risk in patients with premalignant gastric lesions: a nationwide cohort study in The Netherlands. Gastroenterology 2008, 134:945-952.
26. Correa P., Piazuelo M.B., Wilson K.T. Pathology of gastric intestinal metaplasia: clinical implications. Am J Gastroenterol 2010, 105:493-498.
27. Giraud A.S. Metaplasia as a premalignant pathology in the stomach. Gastroenterology 2007, 132:2053-2056.
28. Barclay R.L., Vicari J.J., Greenlaw R.L. Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008, 6:1091-1098.