Feminist ethics of care

The SAGE Handbook of Social Work

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 341-354

  Featherstone, Brid ^a   Morris, Kate ^b  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925336183     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781446247648.n23     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. Banks, S. (1995). Ethics and values in social work. London: BASW.
2. Biestek, F.P. (1961). The casework relationship. London: Allen and Unwin.
3. Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering. California: University of Yale Press.
4. Fawcett, B., and Featherstone, B. (2000). Introduction. In B.Fawcett, Featherstone, B., Fook, J., and Rossiter, A. (Eds). Practice and research in social work: Postmodern feminist perspectives. London: Routledge.
5. Featherstone, B. (1997). Introduction. In W.Hollway and Featherstone, B. (Eds), Mothering and ambivalence. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203284018 http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203284018
6. Featherstone, B. (2010). Ethic of care. In M.Gray and Webb, S.A. (Eds), Ethics and value perspectives in social work. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 73-84.
7. Fowler, B. (2009). The recognition/redistribution debate and Bourdieu’s theory of practice. Theory, Culture and Society, 26(1), 144-156. doi:10.1177/0263276408099020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276408099020
8. Fraser, N., and Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution of recognition: A politico-philosophical exchange. London: Verso.
9. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard, MA, Harvard University Press.
10. Gray, M., (2010). Moral sources and emergent ethical theories in social work. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 1794-1811. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcp104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcp104
11. Gray, M. and Webb, S.A. (Eds) (2010). Ethics and value perspectives in social work. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
12. Hekman, S. (1995). Moral voices, moral selves. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
13. Holland, S. (2010). Looked after children and the ethic of care. British Journal of Social Work, 40(6), 1664-1680. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcp086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcp086
14. Hollway, W. (2006). The capacity to care. London: Routledge.
15. Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
16. Houston, S. (2003). Establishing virtue in social work: A response to McBeath and Webb. British Journal of Social Work, 33, 819-824. doi:10.1093/bjsw/33.6.819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/33.6.819
17. Houston, S. (2010). Discourse ethics. In M.Gray and Webb, S.A, (Eds), Ethics and value perspectives in social work. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 95-107.
18. Houston, S., and Dolan, P. (2008). Conceptualising child and family support: The contribution of Honneth’s critical theory of recognition. Children and Society, 22, 458-469. doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2007.00126.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2007.00126.x
19. Hugman, R., and Smith, D. (1995). Ethical issues in social work: An overview. In R.Hugman and Smith, D. (Eds), Ethical issues in social work. London: Routledge.
20. Lister, R. (2001). Towards a citizens' welfare state: The 3 + 2 'R’s' of welfare reform. Theory, Culture and Society, 18(2-3), 91-111. doi:10.1177/02632760122051805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02632760122051805
21. Lister, R. (2003). Citizenship: Feminist perspectives (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
22. Lynch, K., Baker, J., and Lyons, M. (2009). Introduction. In K.Lynch, Baker, J., and Lyons, M. (Eds), Affective equality: Love, care and injustice. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
23. McNay, L (2008). The trouble with recognition: Subjectivity, suffering and agency. Sociological Theory, 26(3), 271-296. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00329.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00329.x
24. Morris, K. (2006). Camden FGC service: An evaluation of outcomes. London: Borough of Camden.
25. Morris, K., and Featherstone, B. (2010). Investing in children, regulating parents and supporting whole families. Social Policy and Society, 9(4), 557-586. doi:10.1017/S1474746410000278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1474746410000278
26. Orme, J. (2001). Gender and community care: Social work and social care perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
27. Orme, J. (2002). Social work: Gender, care and justice. British Journal of Social Work, 32, 799-814. doi:10.1093/bjsw/32.6.799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/32.6.799
28. Segal, L. (1987). Is the future female?London: Virago.
29. Sevenhuijsen, S. (1998). Citizenship and the ethics of care. London: Routledge.
30. Tronto, J. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.
31. Tronto, J. (2010). Creating caring institutions: Politics, plurality and purpose. Ethics and Social Welfare, 4(2), 158-171. doi:10.1080/17496535.2010.484259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2010.484259
32. Webb, S.A. (2006). Social work in a risk society. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
33. Webb, S.A. (2010). (Re)Assembling the left: The politics of redistribution and recognition in social work. British Journal of Social Work, 40(8), 2364-2379. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcq070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq070
34. Williams, F. (1996). Postmodernism, feminism and the question of difference. In N.Parton (Ed.), Social theory, social change and social work. London: Routledge.
35. Williams, F. (2001). In and beyond New Labour: Towards a new political ethics of care. Critical Social Policy, 21(4), 467-493. doi:10.1177/026101830102100405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026101830102100405
36. Williams, F. (2004). Rethinking families. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.