Evaluating the importance of mitotic asymmetry in cyton-based models for FSE-based flow cytometry data

International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics

Volumn 100, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 131-156

  Banks, H T ^a   Kapraun, D F ^a   Peligero, Cristina ^b   Argilaguet, Jordi ^b   Meyerhans, Andreas ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Asymmetric cell division; Cell division number; Cell proliferation; CFSE; Flow cytometry; Inverse problems; Label structured population dynamics; Partial differential equations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925334954     PISSN: 13118080     EISSN: 13143395     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12732/ijpam.v100i1.12     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. H.T. Banks, S. Hu, W.C. Thompson, Modeling and Inverse Problems in the Presence of Uncertainty, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2014.
2. H.T. Banks, D.F. Kapraun, K.G. Link, W.C. Thompson, C. Peligero, J. Argilaguet, and A. Meyerhans, Experimental and biological variability in CFSE-based flow cytometry data, CRSC-TR13-10, North Carolina State University, September 2013.
3. H.T. Banks, D.F. Kapraun, K.G. Link, W.C. Thompson, C. Peligero, J. Argilaguet, and A. Meyerhans, Analysis of variability in estimates of cell proliferation parameters for cyton-based models using CFSE-based flow cytometry data, CRSC-TR13-14, North Carolina State University, November 2013; J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl., to appear.
4. H.T. Banks, D.F. Kapraun, W.C. Thompson, C. Peligero, J. Argilaguet, and A. Meyerhans, A novel statistical analysis and interpretation of flow cytometry data, CRSC-TR12-23, North Carolina State University, March 2013; J. Biol. Dyn. 7 (2013), 96-132.
5. H.T. Banks, Z.R. Kenz, and W.C. Thompson, An Extension of RSS-based Model Comparison Tests for Weighted Least Squares, CRSC-TR12-18, North Carolina State University, August 2012; Intl. J. Pure and Appl. Math. 79 (2012).
6. H.T. Banks, K.L. Sutton, W.C. Thompson, G. Bocharov, M. Doumic, T. Schenkel, J. Argilaguet, S. Giest, C. Peligero, and A. Meyerhans, A new model for the estimation of cell proliferation dynamics using CFSE data, CRSC-TR11-05, North Carolina State University, Revised July 2011; J. Immunol. Methods 373 (2011), 143-160.
7. H.T. Banks and W.C. Thompson, A division-dependent compartmental model with cyton and intracellular label dynamics, CRSC-TR12-12, North Carolina State University, May 2012; Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. 77 (2012), 119-147.
8. H.T. Banks and H.T. Tran, Mathematical and Experimental Modeling of Physical and Biological Processes, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2009.
9. G. Bocharov, T. Luzyanina, J. Cupovic, and B. Ludewig, Asymmetry of cell division in CFSE-based lymphocyte proliferation analysis, Front. Immunol. 4 (2013), published online.
10. G. Casella and R.L. Berger, Statistical Inference (2nd Edition), Duxbury, 2002.
11. M. Davidian and D.M. Giltinan, Nonlinear Models for Repeated Measurement Data, Chapman and Hall, London, 2000.
12. A.V. Gett and P.D. Hodgkin, A cellular calculus for signal integration by T cells, Nat. Immunol. 1 (2000), 239-244.
13. J. Hasenauer, D. Schittler, and F. Allgöwer, Analysis and simulation of division- and label-structured population models: a new tool to analyze proliferation assays, Bull. Math. Biol. 74 (2012), 2692-2732.
14. E.D. Hawkins, M. Hommel, M.L. Turner, F. Battye, J. Markham and P.D. Hodgkin, Measuring lymphocyte proliferation, survival and differentiation using CFSE time-series data, Nat. Protoc. 2 (2007), 2057-2067.
15. E.D. Hawkins, M.L. Turner, M.R. Dowling, C. van Gend, and P.D. Hodgkin, A model of immune regulation as a consequence of randomized lymphocyte division and death times, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104 (2007), 5032-5037.
16. D.F. Kapraun, Cell Proliferation Models, CFSE-Based Flow Cytometry Data, and Quantification of Uncertainty, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC (24 July 2014).
17. T. Luzyanina, J. Cupovic, B. Ludewig, and G. Bocharov, Mathematical models for CFSE labelled lymphocyte dynamics: asymmetry and time-lag in division, J. Math. Biol. 69 (2014), 1547-83.
18. A.B. Lyons, J. Hasbold, and P.D. Hodgkin, Flow cytometric analysis of cell division history using dilution of carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester, a stably integrated fluorescent probe, Methods Cell Biol. 63 (2001), 375-398.
19. A.B. Lyons and C.R. Parish, Determination of lymphocyte division by flow cytometry, J. Immunological Methods 171 (1994), 131-137.
20. D. Schittler, J. Hasenauer, and F. Allgöwer, A generalized model for cell proliferation: Integrating division numbers and label dynamics, Proc. Eighth International Workshop on Computational Systems Biology (WCSB 2011), June 2011, Zurich, Switzerland, p. 165-168.
21. G.A. Seber and C.J. Wild, Nonlinear Regression, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2003.
22. R. Sennerstam, Partition of protein (mass) to sister cell pairs at mitosis: a re-evaluation, J. Cell. Sci. 90 (1988), 301-306.
23. W.C. Thompson, Partial Differential Equation Modeling of Flow Cytometry Data from CFSE-based Proliferation Assays, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC (8 December 2011).
24. S.A. Weston and C.R. Parish, New fluorescent dyes for lymphocyte migration studies: Analysis by flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy, J. Immunological Methods 133 (1990), 87-97.