Role of innovative technologies under the global zero emissions scenarios

Applied Energy

Volumn 162, Issue , 2016, Pages 1483-1493

  Tokimatsu, Koji ^a,b,c   Konishi, Satoshi ^b   Ishihara, Keiichi ^b   Tezuka, Tetsuo ^b   Yasuoka, Rieko ^d   Nishio, Masahiro ^c  

^a TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

^d System Research Center Co Ltd   (Japan)

Author keywords

A1T scenario; BECCS; SRES; Zero emission

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTION; CARBON CAPTURE; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ECONOMICS; HYDROGEN STORAGE; INNOVATION; LINEAR PROGRAMMING;

A1T SCENARIO; ADVANCED ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES; BECCS; INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGES; SPECIAL REPORT ON EMISSIONS SCENARIOS; SRES; ZERO EMISSION; ZERO-EMISSION ENERGY SYSTEMS;

GEOTHERMAL ENERGY;

BIOENERGY; BIOMASS POWER; CARBON SINK; COAL; ECONOMIC GROWTH; EMISSION; ENERGY PLANNING; GEOTHERMAL ENERGY; HYDROGEN; INNOVATION; INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE;

EID: 84925308462     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.051     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. UNFCCC. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; 1992 <> [accessed 22.08.14]. http://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/background_publications_htmlpdf/application/pdf/conveng.pdf.
2. Victor DG, Zhou D, Ahmed EHM, Dadhich PK, Olivier JGJ, Rogner HH, et al. Introductory chapter. In: Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, et al., editors. Climate change 2014: mitigation. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the inter-governmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
3. Fisher B.S., Nakicenovic N., Alfsen K., Corfee Morlot J., de la Chesnaye F., Hourcade J.C., et al. Issues related to mitigation in the long term context. Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the inter-governmental panel on climate change 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York. B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer (Eds.).
4. Hedenus F., Azar C., Lindgren K. Induced technological change in a limited foresight optimization model. Energy J 2006, Special Issue #1, Endogenous Technological Change:109-122.
5. David P. Comparison of climate policies in the ENTICE-BR model. Energy J 2006, Special Issue #1, Endogenous Technological Change:163-174.
6. Reyer G. ITC in a global growth-climate model with CCS: the value of induced technical change for climate stabilization. Energy J 2006, Special Issue #1, Endogenous Technological Change:223-240.
7. Valentina B., Carraro C., Galeotti M. The dynamics of carbon and energy intensity in a model of endogenous technical change. Energy J 2006, Special Issue #1, Endogenous Technological Change:191-206.
8. Azar C., Lindgren K., Andersson B. Global energy scenarios meeting stringent CO2 constraints-cost effective fuel choices in the transportation sector. Energy Policy 2003, 31:961-976.
9. Azar C., Lindgren K., Larson E., Möllersten K. Carbon capture and storage from fossil fuels and biomass-costs and potential role in stabilizing the atmosphere. Clim Change 2006, 74:47-79.
10. Rogelj J., McCollum D.L., O'Neill B.C., Riahi K. 2020 emissions levels required to limit warming to below 2 degrees. Nature Clim Change 2013, 3:405-412. 10.1038/nclimate1758.
11. Rogelj J., McCollum D.L., Reisinger A., Meinshausen M., Riahi K. Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation. Nature 2013, 493:79-83. 10.1038/nature11787.
12. Luderer G., Bertram C., Calvin K., Cian E., Kriegler E. Implications of weak near-term climate policies on long-term mitigation pathways. Clim Change 2013, 1-14. 10.1007/s10584-013-0899-9.
13. Grahn M., Azar C., Williander M.I., Anderson J.E., Mueller S.A., Wallington T.J. Fuel and vehicle technology choices for passenger vehicles in achieving stringent CO2 targets: connections between transportation and other energy sectors. Environ Sci Technol 2009, 43:3365-3371.
14. Azar C., Lindgren K., Obersteiner M., Riahi K., van Vuuren D.P., den Elzen K.M.G.J., et al. The feasibility of low CO2 concentration targets and the role of bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). Clim Change 2010, 100:195-202.
15. Azar C., Johansson D.J.A., Mattsson N. Meeting global temperature targets-the role of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage. Environ Res Lett 2013, 8:034004.
16. Riahi K., Grubler A., Nakicenovic N. Scenarios of long-term socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2007, 74:887-935.
17. van Vuuren D.P., den Elzen M.G.J., Lucas P.L., Eickhout B., Strengers B.J., van Ruijven B., et al. Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: an assessment of reduction strategies and costs. Clim Change 2007, 81:119-159.
18. Edenhofer O., Knopf B., Barker T., Baumstark L., Bellevrat E., Chateau B., et al. The economics of low stabilization: model comparison of mitigation strategies and costs. Energy J 2010, 31:11-48.
19. van Vuuren D.P., Riahi K. The relationship between short-term emissions and long-term concentration targets. Clim Change 2011, 104:793-801.
20. van Vuuren D.P., Isaac M., Kundzewicz Z., Arnell N., Barker T., Criqui P., et al. Scenarios as the basis for assessment of mitigation and adaptation. Making climate change work for us 2010, 54-86. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. M. Hulme, H. Neufeldt (Eds.).
21. van Vuuren D.P., Edmonds J., Kainuma M.L.T., Riahi K., Thomson A., Matsui T., et al. Representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Change 2011, 109:5-31.
22. Meinshausen M., Smith S.J., Calvin K., Daniel J.S., Kainuma M.L.T., Lamarque J.F., et al. The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Clim Change 2011, 109:213-241.
23. Moss R., Edmonds J.A., Hibbard K.A., Manning M.R., Rose S.K., van Vuuren D., et al. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 2010, 463:747-756.
24. van Vuuren D.P., Riahi K., Moss R., Edmonds J., Thomson A., Nakicenovic N., et al. A proposal for a new scenario framework to support research and assessment in different climate research communities. Glob Environ Change 2012, 22(1):21-35.
25. Rogner H.H. An assessment of world hydrocarbon resources. Annu Rev Energy Env 1997, 22(1):217-262.
26. USGS World Energy Assessment Team, U.S. department of the interior, U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Geological Survey World Petroleum Assessment 2000 - Description and Results, U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series - DDS-60 <> [accessed 22.08.14]. http://pubs.usgs.gov/dds/dds-060/index.html.
27. OECD/NEA (Nuclear Energy Agency) Forty years of uranium resources, production and demand in perspective. The red book retrospective 2006, OECD, Paris.
28. Hoogwijk M. On the global and regional potential of renewable energy sources 2004, Utrecht University, ISBN: 90-393-3640-7.
29. Hoogwijk M, Graus W. Global potential of renewable energy sources: a literature assessment. Background Report; March 2008. PECSNL072975.
30. Fischedick M., Schaeffer R., Adedoyin A., Akai M., Bruckner T., Clarke L., et al. Mitigation potential and costs. IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation (SRREN) 2011, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, K. Seyboth, P. Matschoss, S. Kadner, T. Zwickel, P. Eickemeier, G. Hansen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow (Eds.).
31. IPCC Special Report on CO2 Capture and Storage (SRCCS) 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
32. Minstry of Energy, Trade, and Industry (METI), Japan. Outlook of long-term energy demand [Recalculation]; August 2009 <> [accessed 19.08.14]. http://www.meti.go.jp/report/downloadfiles/g90902a01j.pdf.
33. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO). Roadmap PV2030+; June 2009.
34. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO). White paper on renewable energy technology; July 2010.
35. Ministry of Environment/EX Corporation, Asia Air Survey Co., Ltd, Pacific Consultants Co., Ltd. and Itochu Techno-Solutions Corporations. Study of potential for the introduction of renewable energy (FY 2010); March 2011.
36. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development/International Energy Agency/Nuclear Energy Agency (OECD/IEA/NEA). Projected costs of generating electricity 2010 edition. Paris: OECD; 2010.
37. Rhodes J.S., Keith D.W. Engineering economic analysis of biomass IGCC with carbon capture and storage. Biomass Bioenergy 2005, 29(6):440-450.
38. Gotoh Y, Sato O, Tadokoro Y. Modeling of long-term energy system of Japan. JAERI-Research 99-046, Department of Nuclear Energy System, Tokai Research Establishment, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, Tokai, Naka, Ibaraki, Japan; 1999.
39. Grahn M., Azar C., Lindgren K., Berndes G., Gielen D. Biomass for heat or as transportation fuel? A comparison between two model-based studies. Biomass Bioenergy 2007, 31(11-12):747-758.
40. NEDO/IAE (The Institute of Applied Energy). Study on feasibility of introducing coal based synfuels in energy systems. Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan; 2007. 20120000000264.
41. Kenzo I. Design study of small power tokamak nuclear fusion reactor for the biomass-fusion hybrid concept. Ph.D thesis. Kyoto (Japan): Kyoto University; 2012.
42. OECD/IEA Renewables for heating and cooling 2007, OECD, Paris.
43. WBCSD. Mobility 2030 - meeting the challenges to sustainability. Geneva: WBCSD; 2004 [accessed 21.08.14]. http://www.wbcsdpublications.org/cd_files/datas/business_applications/mobility/pdf/JA-Mobility2030-FullReport.pdf.
44. Fulton L., Cazzola P., Cuenot F. IEA Mobility Model (MoMo) and its use in the ETP 2008. Energy Policy 2009, 37:3758-3768.
45. Wigley T.M.L., Richels R., Edmonds J. Economics and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Nature 1996, 379:240-243.
46. Kypreos S. Modeling experience curves in MERGE (model for evaluating regional and global effects). Energy 2005, 30(14):2721-2737.
47. van Vuuren DP, Van Ruijven B, Hoogwijk MM, Isaac M, De Vries HJM. TIMER 2: model description and application. Integrated modeling of global environmental change. An overview of IMAGE 2.4. In: Bouwman AF, Kram T, Klein Goldewijk K, Bilthoven. The Netherlands: Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP); 2006. p. 39-59.
48. GEA 2012. Global energy assessment-toward a sustainable future. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK and New York, NY, USA and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria <> [accessed 22.08.14]. http://www.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/research/Flagship-Projects/Global-Energy-Assessment/Global_Energy_Assessment_FullReport.pdf.
49. van Vuuren D.P., van Vliet J., Stehfest E. Future bio-energy potential under various natural constraints. Energy Policy 2009, 37:4220-4230.
50. Berndes G., Hoogwijk M., van den Broek R. The contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply: a review of 17 studies. Biomass Bioenergy 2003, 25:1-28.
51. Nordhaus W.D. Economic aspects of global warming in a post-Copenhagen environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2010, 107(26):11721-11726.
52. [accessed 22.08.14]. http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/wigley/magicc/.
53. Riahi K., Kriegler E., Johnson N., Bertram C., den Elzen M., Eom J., et al. Locked into Copenhagen pledges - implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2015, 90(Part A):8-23.
54. Mondal M.A.H., Kennedy S., Mezher T. Long-term optimization of United Arab Emirates energy future: policy implications. Appl Energy 2014, 114:466-474.
55. Anandarajah G., Gambhir A. India's CO2 emission pathways to 2050: what role can renewables play?. Appl Energy 2014, 131:79-86.
56. Kikuchi Y., Kimura S., Okamoto Y., Koyama M. A scenario analysis of future energy systems based on an energy flow model represented as functionals of technology options. Appl Energy 2014, 132:586-601.
57. Daly H.E., Ramea K., Chiodi A., Yeh S., Gargiulo M., Gallachóir BÓ Incorporating travel behaviour and travel time into TIMES energy system models. Appl Energy 2014, 135:429-439.
58. Tavoni M., Socolow R. Modeling meets science and technology: an introduction to a special issue on negative emissions. Clim Change 2013, 118:1-14.