Evaluation of uav photogrammetric accuracy for mapping and earthworks computations

Geomatica

Volumn 68, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 309-317

  Cryderman, Chris ^a   Bill Mah, S ^a   Shufletoski, Aaron ^a  

^a Underhill Geomatics Ltd   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT CONTROL; FLIGHT DYNAMICS; GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM; MAPPING; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; PHOTOGRAPHY; PILES; ROCK MECHANICS; SOLS; SURVEYS; UNMANNED VEHICLES;

CONFIDENCE LEVELS; GEOMETRIC ANALYSIS; GROUND CONTROL; POSITIONAL ACCURACY; SURFACE MODELS; UAV SYSTEMS; UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS;

UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES (UAV);

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GNSS; MAPPING METHOD; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; PHOTOGRAPHY;

EID: 84925303586     PISSN: 11951036     EISSN: 19254296     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5623/cig2014-405     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. ASPRS, the American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 1988. ASPRS Interim Accuracy Standards for Large-Scale Maps. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 1989: 1038.
2. Draeyer, B. and C. Strecha. White paper: how accurate are UAV surveying methods? Pix4D, 2014. Available from: https://support.pix4d.com/entries/40219303-How-accurate-are-UAV-surveying-methods
3. Giradeau-Montaut, D., et.al. 2004. CloudCompare user’s manual for version 2.1. Available from: http://www.cloudcompare.net, page 2
4. Mah, S.B. 2014. Implementation of an unmanned aerial vehicle system for large scale mapping. [In process] Underhill Geomatics Ltd. Vancouver, BC. Available on request.
5. Mason, M. 2013. Survey method precision testing. Internal report, Underhill Geomatics Ltd. Kamloops, BC. Available on request.
6. Savoy, M. 2013. Accuracy of pile volume measurement with photogrammetry. Available from: http://info.photomodeler.com/blog/bid/323350/Accuracy-of-Pile-Volume-Measurement-with-PhotogrammetrySBCD, Subcommittee for Base Cartographic Data, Federal
7. Geographic Data Committee. 1998. Geospatial Positioning Accuracy Standards. Part 3: National Standards for Spatial Data Accuracy. Reston, Virgina, USA.
8. Strecha, C. 2014. The rayCloud–a vision beyond the point cloud. FIG Congress 2014, Engaging the challenges–enhancing the relevance. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
9. Wang, Q. et.al., 2014. Accuracy evaluation of 3D geometry from low-attitude UAV images: a case study at Zijin Mine. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XL-4, 2014, ISPRSTechnical Commission IV Symposium, 14-16 May, Suzhou, China.