Preliminary results from a crowdsourcing experiment in immunohistochemistry

Diagnostic Pathology

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Mea, Vincenzo Della ^a   Maddalena, Eddy ^a   Mizzaro, Stefano ^a   Machin, Piernicola ^b   Beltrami, Carlo A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UDINE   (Italy)

^b ULSS 7 Pieve di Soligo   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CROWDSOURCING; HUMAN; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; INTERNET;

CROWDSOURCING; HUMANS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; INTERNET;

EID: 84925303432     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17461596     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1746-1596-9-S1-S6     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Mitry D, Peto T, Hayat S, Morgan JE, Khaw KT, Foster PJ: Crowdsourcing as a novel technique for retinal fundus photography classification: analysis of images in the EPIC Norfolk cohort on behalf of the UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium. PLoS One 2013,8(8):e71154. Aug 21
2. Luengo-Oroz MA, Arranz A, Frean J: Crowdsourcing malaria parasite quantification: an online game for analyzing images of infected thick blood smears. J Med Internet Res 2012,14(6):e167. Nov 29
3. Nguyen TB, Wang S, Anugu V, Rose N, McKenna M, Petrick N, Burns JE, Summers RM: Distributed human intelligence for colonic polyp classification in computer-aided detection for CT colonography. Radiology 2012,262(3):824-33.
4. Amazon Mechanical Turk [ https://www.mturk.com ]
5. Crowdflower [ http://www.crowdflower.com ]
6. Oleson D: Crowdsourcing Scientific Research: Leveraging the Crowd for Scientific Discovery. [http://www.crowdflower.com/blog/2011/11/scientific-research ]
7. Surowiecki J: The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies and Nations. Little, Brown 2004.
8. Inwald EC, Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Hofstädter F, Zeman F, Koller M, Gerstenhauer M, Ortmann O: Ki-67 is a prognostic parameter in breast cancer patients: results of a large population-based cohort of a cancer registry. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013,139(2):539-52. Jun
9. Fasanella S, Leonardi E, Cantaloni C, Eccher C, Bazzanella I, Aldovini D, Bragantini E, Morelli L, Cuorvo LV, Ferro A, Gasperetti F, Berlanda G, Dalla Palma P, Barbareschi M: Proliferative activity in human breast cancer: Ki-67 automated evaluation and the influence of different Ki-67 equivalent antibodies. Diagn Pathol 2011,6(Suppl 1):S7. Mar 30
10. Gudlaugsson E, Skaland I, Janssen EA, Smaaland R, Shao Z, Malpica A, Voorhorst F, Baak JP: Comparison of the effect of different techniques for measurement of Ki67 proliferation on reproducibility and prognosis prediction accuracy in breast cancer. Histopathology 2012,61(6):1134-44. Dec
11. Mohammed ZM, McMillan DC, Elsberger B, Going JJ, Orange C, Mallon E, Doughty JC, Edwards J: Comparison of visual and automated assessment of Ki-67 proliferative activity and their impact on outcome in primary operable invasive ductal breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2012,106(2):383-8. Jan 17
12. Alonso O, Mizzaro S: Using crowdsourcing for TREC relevance assessment. Information Processing and Management 2012, 48:1053-1066.