Long-term pilot scale investigation of novel hybrid ultrafiltration-osmotic membrane bioreactors

Desalination

Volumn 363, Issue , 2015, Pages 64-74

  Holloway, Ryan W ^a   Wait, Andrew S ^a   Fernandes da Silva, Aline ^a   Herron, Jack ^b   Schutter, Mark D ^b   Lampi, Keith ^b   Cath, Tzahi Y ^a  

^a Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering   (United States)

^b Hydration Technology Innovations   (United States)

Author keywords

Direct potable reuse; Forward osmosis; Membrane bioreactor; Nutrient recovery; Osmotic MBR; Salt rejection

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS; BIOCONVERSION; BIOLOGICAL WATER TREATMENT; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; MEMBRANE FOULING; MEMBRANES; NITROGEN REMOVAL; NUTRIENTS; OSMOSIS; PHOSPHORUS; SALTS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

FORWARD OSMOSIS; MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; NUTRIENT RECOVERY; OSMOTIC MBR; POTABLE REUSE; SALT REJECTIONS;

BIOREACTORS;

EID: 84925290093     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.05.040     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. NRC Water Reuse: Potential for Expanding the Nation's Water Supply through Reuse of Municipal Wastewater 2012, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
2. Lubello C., Gori R., Nicese F.P., Ferrini F. Municipal-treated wastewater reuse for plant nurseries irrigation. Water Res. 2004, 38:2939-2947.
3. Oron G., Campos C., Gillerman L., Salgot M. Wastewater treatment, renovation and reuse for agricultural irrigation in small communities. Agric. Water Manag. 1999, 38:223-234.
4. McCarty P.L., Bae J., Kim J. Domestic wastewater treatment as a net energy producer - can this be achieved?. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:7100-7106.
5. Frijns J., Hofman J., Nederlof M. The potential of (waste)water as energy carrier. Energy Convers. Manag. 2013, 65:357-363.
6. Arevalo J., Garralon G., Plaza F., Moreno B., Perez J., Gomez M.A. Wastewater reuse after treatment by tertiary ultrafiltration and a membrane bioreactor (MBR): a comparative study. Desalination 2009, 243:32-41.
7. Brehant A., Bonnelye V., Perez M. Comparison of MF/UF pretreatment with conventional filtration prior to RO membranes for surface seawater desalination. Desalination 2002, 144:353-360.
8. Pearce G.K. The case for UF/MF pretreatment to RO in seawater applications. Desalination 2007, 203:286-295.
9. Ottoson J., Hansen A., Bjorlenius B., Norder H., Stenstrom T.A. Removal of viruses, parasitic protozoa and microbial indicators in conventional and membrane processes in a wastewater pilot plant. Water Res. 2006, 40:1449-1457.
10. Achilli A., Cath T.Y., Marchand E.A., Childress A.E. The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: a low fouling alternative to MBR processes. Desalination 2009, 239:10-21.
11. Alturki A., McDonald J., Khan S.J., Hai F.I., Price W.E., Nghiem L.D. Performance of a novel osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) system: flux stability and removal of trace organics. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 113:201-206.
12. Cornelissen E.R., Harmsen D., de Korte K.F., Ruiken C.J., Qin J.J., Oo H., Wessels L.P. Membrane fouling and process performance of forward osmosis membranes on activated sludge. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 319:158-168.
13. Nawaz M.S., Gadelha G., Khan S.J., Hankins N. Microbial toxicity effects of reverse transported draw solute in the forward osmosis membrane bioreactor (FO-MBR). J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 429:323-329.
14. Zhang H., Ma Y., Jiang T., Zhang G., Yang F. Influence of activated sludge properties on flux behavior in osmosis membrane bioreactor (OMBR). J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 390-391:270-276.
15. Zhang J.S., Loong W.L.C., Chou S.R., Tang C.Y., Wang R., Fane A.G. Membrane biofouling and scaling in forward osmosis membrane bioreactor. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 403:8-14.
16. Lay W.C.L., Zhang Q.Y., Zhang J.S., McDougald D., Tang C.Y., Wang R., Liu Y., Fane A.G. Study of integration of forward osmosis and biological process: membrane performance under elevated salt environment. Desalination 2011, 283:123-130.
17. Alturki A.A., McDonald J.A., Khan S.J., Price W.E., Nghiem L.D., Elimelech M. Removal of trace organic contaminants by the forward osmosis process. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 103:258-266.
18. Hancock N.T., Xu P., Heil D.M., Bellona C., Cath T.Y. Comprehensive bench- and pilot-scale investigation of trace organic compounds rejection by forward osmosis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:8483-8490.
19. Jin X., Shan J.H., Wang C., Wei J., Tang C.Y.Y. Rejection of pharmaceuticals by forward osmosis membranes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 227:55-61.
20. Linares R.V., Yangali-Quintanilla V., Li Z.Y., Amy G. Rejection of micropollutants by clean and fouled forward osmosis membrane. Water Res. 2011, 45:6737-6744.
21. Hancock N.T., Xu P., Roby M.J., Gomez J.D., Cath T.Y. Towards direct potable reuse with forward osmosis: technical assessment of long-term process performance at the pilot scale. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 445:34-46.
22. Hancock N.T., Cath T.Y. Solute coupled diffusion in osmotically driven membrane processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:6769-6775.
23. Cath T.Y., Childress A.E., Elimelech M. Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent developments. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281:70-87.
24. Klaysom C., Cath T.Y., Depuydt T., Vankelecom I.F.J. Forward and pressure retarded osmosis: potential solutions for global challenges in energy and water supply. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42:6959-6989.
25. Hancock N.T., Black N.D., Cath T.Y. A comparative life cycle assessment of hybrid osmotic dilution desalination and established seawater desalination and wastewater reclamation processes. Water Res. 2012, 46:1145-1154.
26. Uygur A. Specific nutrient removal rates in saline wastewater treatment using sequencing batch reactor. Process Biochem. 2006, 41:61-66.
27. Ye L., Peng C.Y., Tang B., Wang S.Y., Zhao K.F., Peng Y.Z. Determination effect of influent salinity and inhibition time on partial nitrification in a sequencing batch reactor treating saline sewage. Desalination 2009, 246:556-566.
28. Bowden K.S., Achilli A., Childress A.E. Organic ionic salt draw solutions for osmotic membrane bioreactors. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 122:207-216.
29. Xiao D., Tang C.Y., Zhang J., Lay W.C.L., Wang R., Fane A.G. Modeling salt accumulation in osmotic membrane bioreactors: implications for FO membrane selection and system operation. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 366:314-324.
30. Ersu C.B., Ong S.K., Arslankaya E., Lee Y.W. Impact of solids residence time on biological nutrient removal performance of membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 2010, 44:3192-3202.
31. Cath T.Y., Holloway R.W., Herron J.R., Lampi K., Pravin M.S. Water reuse system and method, USPTO 61/751,195 January 10, 2013.
32. Pravin M.S., Cath T.Y., Holloway R.W., Herron J.R., Lampi K., Schultz W.L., Wait A.S. Water reuse system and method, USPTO 61/876,108 September 10, 2013.
33. DOW FILMTEC™ SW30-2540 http://www.dowwaterandprocess.com/en/products/f/filmtec_sw30_2540.
34. Cath T.Y., Elimelech M., McCutcheon J.R., McGinnis R.L., Achilli A., Anastasio D., Brady A.R., Childress A.E., Farr I.V., Hancock N.T., Lampi J., Nghiem L.D., Xie M., Yip N.Y. Standard methodology for evaluating membrane performance in osmotically driven membrane processes. Desalination 2013, 312:31-38.
35. Membrane Systems Koch PURON® hollow fiber submerged membranes for MBR applications http://www.kochmembrane.com/PDFs/Data-Sheets/Hollow-Fiber/UF/KMS_Puron_Hollow_Fiber_PSH_37_41_Row_Datasheet.aspx.
36. DOW FILMTEC membranes: system performance projection http://msdssearch.dow.com/PublishedLiteratureDOWCOM/dh_0035/0901b80380035b3e.pdf?filepath=liquidseps/pdfs/noreg/609-02056.pdf&fromPage=GetDoc.
37. Bohm L., Drews A., Prieske H., Berube P.R., Kraume M. The importance of fluid dynamics for MBR fouling mitigation. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 122:50-61.
38. Bacchin P., Aimar P., Field R.W. Critical and sustainable fluxes: theory, experiments and applications. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281:42-69.
39. Wang X.M., Waite T.D. Impact of gel layer formation on colloid retention in membrane filtration processes. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 325:486-494.
40. Parida V., Ng H.Y. Forward osmosis organic fouling: effects of organic loading, calcium and membrane orientation. Desalination 2013, 312:88-98.
41. Mi B., Elimelech M. Chemical and physical aspects of organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 320:292-302.
42. Mi B., Elimelech M. Organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes: fouling reversibility and cleaning without chemical reagents. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 348:337-345.
43. Holloway R.W., Childress A.E., Dennett K.E., Cath T.Y. Forward osmosis for concentration of anaerobic digester centrate. Water Res. 2007, 41:4005-4014.
44. Phuntsho S., Shon H.K., Hong S., Lee S., Vigneswaran S. A novel low energy fertilizer driven forward osmosis desalination for direct fertigation: evaluating the performance of fertilizer draw solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 375:172-181.
45. Hancock N.T., Phillip W.A., Elimelech M., Cath T.Y. Bidirectional permeation of electrolytes in osmotically driven membrane processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:10642-10651.
46. Coday B., Heil D.M., Xu P., Cath T.Y. The effects of transmembrane hydraulic pressure on performance of forward osmosis membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47:2386-2393.
47. Wu Y.J., Whang L.M., Fukushima T., Chang S.H. Responses of ammonia-oxidizing archaeal and betaproteobacterial populations to wastewater salinity in a full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plant. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2013, 115:424-432.