GIS-based sustainable city compactness assessment using integration of MCDM, Bayes theorem and RADAR technology

Geocarto International

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 365-387

  Abdullahi, Saleh ^a   Pradhan, Biswajeet ^a   Jebur, Mustafa Neamah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY PUTRA MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Bayes theorem; compact city assessment; GIS; remote sensing; SAR; sustainable urban development

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925281436     PISSN: 10106049     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2014.911967     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abdullahi S, Mahmud ARB, Pradhan B. 2013. Spatial modelling of site suitability assessment for hospitals using geographical information system-based multicriteria approach at Qazvin city, Iran. Geocarto Int. 1–21. doi:10.1080/10106049.2012.75253110.1080/10106049.2012.752531
2. Arifwidodo SD. 2012. Exploring the effect of compact development policy to urban quality of life in Bandung, Indonesia. City Culture Soc. 3:303–311.
3. Arrow KJ, Blackwell D, Girshick MA. 1949. Bayes and minimax solutions of sequential decision problems. Econometrica. 17:213–244.
4. Barrett G. 1996. The transport dimension. In: Jenks M, Burton E, Williams K, editors. The Compact City: a sustainable urban form. London: E & FN Spon; p. 171–180.
5. Benz UC, Hofmann P, Willhauck G, Lingenfelder I, Heynen M. 2004. Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS J Photogrammetry Remote Sens. 58:239–258.10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2003.10.002
6. Bhat CR, Gossen R. 2004. A mixed multinomial logit model analysis of weekend recreational episode type choice. Transp Res B Methodological. 38:767–787.10.1016/j.trb.2003.10.003
7. Brundtland G. 1987. Our common future: report of the 1987 world commission on environment and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Burchell RW, Mukherji S. 2003. Conventional development versus managed growth: the costs of sprawl. Am J Public Health. 93:1534–1540.
9. Burton E. 2002. Measuring urban compactness in UK towns and cities. Environ Planning B. 29:219–250.10.1068/b2713
10. Carruthers JI, Ulfarsson GF. 2002. Fragmentation and sprawl: evidence from interregional analysis. Growth Change. 33:312–340.10.1111/grow.2002.33.issue-3
11. Congalton RG. 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ. 37:35–46.10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B
12. Corr DG, Walker A, Benz U, Lingenfelder I, Rodrigues A. 2003. Classification of urban SAR imagery using object oriented techniques. In Proceedings of IGARSS; July 21–25; Toulouse; p. 188–190.
13. Crewe K, Forsyth A. 2011. Compactness and connection in environmental design: insights from ecoburbs and ecocities for design with nature. Environ Planning B. 38:267–288.10.1068/b35131
14. de Chiara J, Callender J. 1990. Time-saver standards for building types. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
15. Dell’Acqua F, Gamba P. 2003. Texture-based characterization of urban environments on satellite SAR images. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 41:153–159.10.1109/TGRS.2002.807754
16. Ding C. 2004. Urban spatial development in the land policy reform era: evidence from Beijing. Urban Studies. 41:1889–1907.10.1080/0042098042000256305
17. Esch T, Roth A. 2004. Semi-automated classification of urban areas by means of high resolution radar data. In: Proceedings ISPRS 2004 Congress, Comm VII; Istanbul; p. 478–482.
18. Esch T, Thiel M, Schenk A, Roth A, Muller A, Dech S. 2010. Delineation of urban footprints from TerraSAR-X data by analyzing speckle characteristics and intensity information. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 48:905–916.10.1109/TGRS.2009.2037144
19. Fatone L, Maponi P, Zirilli F. 2001. Fusion of SAR/optical images to detect urban areas. In: Remote Sensing and Data Fusion over Urban Areas, IEEE/ISPRS Joint Workshop 2001, IEEE; Rome; p. 217–221.
20. Frame B. 2008. ‘Wicked’, ‘messy’, and ‘clumsy’: long-term frameworks for sustainability. Environ Planning C. 26:1113–1128.10.1068/c0790s
21. Gu Z, Sun Q, Wennersten R. 2013. Impact of urban residences on energy consumption and carbon emissions-an investigation in Nanjing, China. Sustainable Cities Soc. 7:52–61.
22. Henderson FM, Xia Z-G. 1997. SAR applications in human settlement detection, population estimation and urban land use pattern analysis: a status report. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 35:79–85.10.1109/36.551936
23. Hong J, Shen Q, Zhang L. 2013. How do built-environment factors affect travel behavior? A spatial analysis at different geographic scales. Transportation. doi:10.1007/s11116-013-9462-9
24. Idrees MO, Saeidi V, Yusuf YA, Pradhan B. 2013. Advanced differential interferometry SAR techniques for deformation monitoring: a review on sensors and recent research development. Geocarto Int. doi:10.1080/10106049.2013.807305
25. Jenks M, Burton E, Williams K. 1996. Compact cities and sustainability: an introduction. In: Jenks M, Burton E, Williams K, editors. The Compact City: a sustainable urban form. London: E & FN Spon; p. 11–12.
26. Kelly-Schwartz AC, Stockard J, Doyle S, Schlossberg M. 2004. Is sprawl unhealthy? A multilevel analysis of the relationship of metropolitan sprawl to the health of individuals. J Planning Educ Res. 24:184–196.10.1177/0739456X04267713
27. Kropp WW, Lein JK. 2012. Assessing the geographic expression of urban sustainability: a scenario based approach incorporating spatial multicriteria decision analysis. Sustainability. 4:2348–2365.10.3390/su4092348
28. Li X, Yeh AG-O. 2000. Modelling sustainable urban development by the integration of constrained cellular automata and GIS. Int J Geog Inf Sci. 14:131–152.10.1080/136588100240886
29. Lin J, Yang A. 2006. Does the compact-city paradigm foster sustainability? An empirical study in Taiwan. Environ Planning B. 33:365–380.10.1068/b31174
30. Livingstone K, Rogers R. 2003. Housing for a compact city. Greater London authority; p. 9–33.
31. Mahmoud A, Elbialy S, Pradhan B, Buchroithner M. 2011. Field-based landcover classification using TerraSAR-X texture analysis. Adv Space Res. 48:799–805.10.1016/j.asr.2011.04.005
32. Manaugh K, Kreider T. 2013. What is mixed use? Presenting an interaction method for measuring land use mix. J Transp Land Use. 6:63–72.
33. Maria De Almeida C, Batty M, Vieira Monteiro AM, Câmara G, Soares-Filho BS, Cerqueira GC, Pennachin CL. 2003. Stochastic cellular automata modeling of urban land use dynamics: empirical development and estimation. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 27:481–509.10.1016/S0198-9715(02)00042-X
34. Mebratu D. 1998. Sustainability and sustainable development. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 18:493–520.10.1016/S0195-9255(98)00019-5
35. Michaelsen E, Soergel U, Thoennessen U. 2005. Potential of building extraction from multi-aspect high resolution amplitude SAR data. CMRT05, IAPRS; Vienna; p. 149–154.
36. Nozzi D. 2003. Road to ruin: an introduction to sprawl and how to cure it. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
37. Pal M, Mather PM. 2003. An assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification. Remote Sens Environ. 86:554–565.10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00132-9
38. Pradhan B. 2013. A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Comput Geosci. 51:350–365. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.08.023
39. Pradhan B, Bolch T, Buchroithner MF. 2009. Elevation modeling using radargrammetry: case study from Malaysia. In: Proceedings of AGILE; Hannover; p. 1–11.
40. Rosenqvist A, Shimada M, Watanabe M, Tadono T, Yamauchi K. 2004. Implementation of systematic data observation strategies for ALOS PALSAR, PRISM and AVNIR-2. In: Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2004. IGARSS’04. Proceedings. 2004 IEEE International, IEEE; Anchorage, AK; p. 4527–4530.
41. Ševčíková H, Raftery AE, Waddell PA. 2007. Assessing uncertainty in urban simulations using Bayesian melding. Transp Res B. 41:652–669.
42. Sherlock H. 1990. Cities are good for us: the case for high densities, friendly streets, local shops and public transport. London: Transport 2000.
43. Song Y, Knaap G-J. 2004. Measuring urban form: is Portland winning the war on sprawl? J Am Planning Assoc. 70:210–225.10.1080/01944360408976371
44. Stasolla M, Gamba P. 2008. Spatial indexes for the extraction of formal and informal human settlements from high-resolution SAR images. IEEE J Sel Topics Appl Earth Observations Remote Sens. 1:98–106.10.1109/JSTARS.2008.921099
45. Sturm R, Cohen DA. 2004. Suburban sprawl and physical and mental health. Public Health. 118:488–496.10.1016/j.puhe.2004.02.007
46. Tehrany MS, Pradhan B, Jebu MN. 2013. A comparative assessment between object and pixel-based classification approaches for land use/land cover mapping using SPOT 5 imagery. Geocarto Int. 1–19. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2013.76830010.1080/10106049.2013.768300
47. Thinh NX, Arlt G, Heber B, Hennersdorf J, Lehmann I. 2001. Pin-pointing sustainable urban land-use structures with the aid of GIS and cluster analysis. Institute for Ecological and Regional Development, Dresden. In: Hilty LM, Gilgen PW, editor. Sustainability in the information society. 15th International Symposium Informatics for Environmental Protection (Zurich); Zurich: Metropolis Verlag Marburg; p. 559–567.
48. Tooke TR, Coops NC, Goodwin NR, Voogt JA. 2009. Extracting urban vegetation characteristics using spectral mixture analysis and decision tree classifications. Remote Sens Environ. 113:398–407.10.1016/j.rse.2008.10.005
49. Tupin F, Roux M. 2003. Detection of building outlines based on the fusion of SAR and optical features. ISPRS J Photogrammetry Remote Sens. 58:71–82.10.1016/S0924-2716(03)00018-2
50. Turskis Z, Zavadskas EK, Zagorskas J. 2006. Sustainable city compactness evaluation on the basis of GIS and Bayes rule. Int J Strategic Property Manage. 10:185–207.
51. Van Eck JR, Koomen E. 2008. Characterising urban concentration and land-use diversity in simulations of future land use. Ann Regional Sci. 42:123–140.10.1007/s00168-007-0141-7
52. White S, Ellis C. 2007. Sustainability, the environment, and new urbanism: an assessment and agenda for research. J Architectural Planning Res. 24:125–142.
53. Zagorskas J, Burinskienė M, Zavadskas E, Turskis Z. 2007. Urbanistic assessment of city compactness on the basis of GIS applying the COPRAS method. Ekologija. 53:55–63.
54. Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Dejus T, Viteikiene M. 2007. Sensitivity analysis of a simple additive weight method. Int J Manage Decis Making. 8:555–574.10.1504/IJMDM.2007.013418
55. Zhou W, Troy A. 2008. An object-oriented approach for analysing and characterizing urban landscape at the parcel level. Int J Remote Sens. 29:3119–3135.10.1080/01431160701469065
56. Ziaei Z, Pradhan B, Mansor SB. 2013. A rule-based parameter aided with object-based classification approach for extraction of building and roads from WorldView-2 images. Geocarto Int. 1–16. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2013.81903910.1080/10106049.2013.819039