University technology transfer through entrepreneurship: faculty and students in spinoffs

Journal of Technology Transfer

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 661-669

  Boh, Wai Fong ^a   De Haan, Uzi ^b   Strom, Robert ^c  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^c EWING MARION KAUFFMAN FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEMS; EDUCATION; STUDENTS; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

CASE-STUDIES; DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; STUDENT INVOLVEMENTS; TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATIONS; UNIVERSITY SPIN-OFFS; UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER; UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER OFFICES;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 84925277773     PISSN: 08929912     EISSN: 15737047     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-015-9399-6     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Bradley, S., Hayter, C., & Link, A. (2013). Models and methods of university technology transfer. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 9(6), 571–650.
2. Colyvas, J., Crow, M., Gelijns, A., Mazzoleni, R., Nelson, R. R., Rosenberg, N., & Sampat, B. N. (2002). How do university inventions get into practice? Management Science, 48(1), 61–72. doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.1.61.14272.
3. Cyranoski, D., Gilbert, N., Ledford, H., Nayar, A., & Yahia, M. (2011). Education: The PhD factory. Nature, 472, 276–279.
4. Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32(2), 209–227.
5. Fleming, L., Woodward, Y., & Golden, J. (2010). Science and technology entrepreneurship for greater societal benefits: Ideas for curriculum innovation. In Advances in the study of entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth, vol. 21; G. D. Libecap, M. Thursby, and S. Hoskinson (Eds.), Spanning boundaries and disciplines: University technology commercialization in the idea age, Emerald Books.
6. Goldfarb, B., & Henrekson, M. (2003). Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property. Research Policy, 32(4), 639–658.
7. Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045–1067.
8. Hoffer, Thomas, B., Milesi, Carolina, Selfa, Lance, Grigorian, Karen, Foley, Daniel, J., Milan, Lynn M., Proudfoot, Steven L., & Rivers, Emilda B. (2011). InfoBrief SRS: Unemployment Among Doctoral Scientists and Engineers Remained Below the National Average in 2008. National Science Foundation NSF 11-308. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf11308/nsf11308.pdf.
9. Jain, S., & George, G. (2007). Technology transfer offices as institutional entrepreneurs: The case of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation and human embryonic stem cells. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 535.
10. Litan, R. E., & Cook-Deegan, R. (2011). Universities and economic growth: The importance of academic entrepreneurship. In The Kauffman Task Force on Law, Innovation, and Growth (Ed.), Rules for growth: Promoting innovation and growth through legal reform. Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation: Kansas City.