Alignment preferences in basic and derived ditransitives

Languages Across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 263-290

  Malchukov, Andrej L ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTIONARY ANTHROPOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925236928     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1515/9783110331127.263     Document Type: Chapter

References (61)

1. Aissen, Judith L. 1987. Tzotzil Clause Structure. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 7. Dordrecht: Reidel.
2. Asher, Ronald E. & Kumari, T. C. 1997. Malayalam. London: Routledge.
3. Atoyebi, Joseph, Martin Haspelmath & Andrej Malchukov. 2010. Ditransitive constructions in Yoruba. In Andrej Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Studies in ditransitive constructions, 145-166. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
4. Bhat, D. N. S. & Ningomba, M. S., 1997. Manipuri Grammar. Munchen: Lincom.
5. Blansitt, Edward L. Jr. 1984. Dechticaetiative and dative. In Frans Plank (ed.), Objects: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations, 127-150. London: Academic Press.
6. Bodomo, Adams. 1997. The Structure of Dagaare. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
7. Borg, Albert, & Bernard Comrie. 1984. Object diffuseness in Maltese. In Frans Plank (ed.), Objects: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations, 109-126. London: Academic Press.
8. Bugaeva, Anna. 2010. Ainu applicatives in typological perspective. Studies in Language 34(4). 749-801.
9. Carlson, Robert. 1994. Grammar of Supyire. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
10. Chelliah, S. L. 1997. A Grammar of Meithei. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
11. Cole, Peter. 1982. Imbabura Quechua. [Lingua Descriptive Studies, Vol 5]. Amsterdam: North- Holland Publishing Company.
12. Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Comrie, Bernard. 1982. Grammatical relations in Huichol. In Paul J. Hopper & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Studies in Transitivity, 95-115. [Syntax and Semantics 15]. New York: Academic Press.
14. Conti, Carmen. 2008. Receptoresy beneficiarios: estudio tipologico de la ditransitividad. Munich: Lincom.
15. Creissels, Denis. 2010. Benefactive-applicative periphrasis: a typological approach. In Fernando Zuniga & Seppo Kittila (eds.), Benefactives and malefactives: typological perspectives and case studies, 28-66. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
16. Croft, William. 2003. Typology and Universals. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Dayley, Jon P. 1989. Tumpisa (Panamint) Shoshone Grammar. Berkeley. University of California Press.
18. Dik, Simon. 1997. The theory of Functional Grammar. Vol. 2. Complex and derived constructions. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
19. Dixon, Robert, Malcolm Ward. 1972. The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
20. Dixon, Robert Malcolm Ward. 2000. A typology of causatives: form, syntax, and meaning. In Dixon, R.M.W. & A. Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing valency: case studies in transitivity, 30-83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Dryer, Matthew S. 1986. Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative. Language 62. 808-845.
22. nd ed., 224-275. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Fortescue, Michael D. 1984. West Greenlandic. London. Croom Helm.
24. Gerdts, Donna B. 1988. Object and Absolutive in Halkomelem Salish. New York: Garland Publishing.
25. Guerrero, Lilian & Van Valin Jr., Robert, D. 2004. Yaqui and the Analysis of Primary Object Languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 70(3). 290-319.
26. Haspelmath, Martin. 2004. Explaining the Ditransitive Person-Role Constraint: a usage based account. Constructions 2/2004, 49 pp. (free online journal, University of Dusseldorf; http://www.constructions-online.de/articles/35)
27. Haspelmath, Martin. 2005a. Ditransitive Constructions: The Verb ‘Give’. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures, 426-429. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Haspelmath, Martin. 2005b. Argument marking in ditransitive alignment types. Linguistic Discovery 3(1). 1-21.
29. Haspelmath, Martin & Thomas Muller-Bardey. 2004. Valency change. In Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds.), Morphology: A Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation. Vol. 2, 1130-1145. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
30. Haude, Katharina. 2006. A Grammar of Movima. Ph. Diss. Universiteit Nijmegen.
31. Heath, Jeffrey. 1998. A grammar of Koyra Chiini, the Songhay of Timbuktu. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
32. Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language 56. 251-299.
33. Kemmer, Susan & Arie Verhagen 1994. The grammar of causatives and the conceptual structure of events. Cognitive Linguistics 5. 115-156.
34. Kittila, Seppo. 2006. The anomaly of the verb ‘give’ explained by its high (formal and semantic) transitivity. Linguistics 44(3). 569-612.
35. Kruspe, Nicole. 2004. A Grammar of Semelai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Malchukov, Andrej L. 1995. Even. Munich: LINCOM.
37. Malchukov, Andrej & Igor’ Nedjalkov. 2010. Ditransitive constructions in Tungusic languages. In Andrej Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds.) Studies in ditransitive constructions. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 316-352. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
38. Malchukov, Andrej, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie. 2010. Ditransitive constructions: a typological overview. In Andrej Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Studies in ditransitive constructions, 1-65. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
39. Malchukov, Andrej & Martin Haspelmath. In preparation. Ditransitive constructions.
40. Margetts, Anna. 2002. The linguistic encoding of three-participant events in Saliba. Studies in Language 26. 613-637.
41. Margetts, Anna, & Peter K. Austin. 2007. Three participant events in the languages of the world: towards a crosslinguistic typology. Linguistics 45(3). 393-451.
42. Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2005. English Ditransitive Verbs: Aspects of Theory, Description and a Usage-based Model. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.
43. Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & G. G. Sil’nickij. 1969. Tipologija morfologiceskogo i leksiceskogo kauza- tivov. In Aleksandr A. Xolodovic (ed.), Tipologija kauzativnyxkonstrukcij: Morfologiceskij kauzativ, 20-50. Leningrad: Nauka.
44. Nikolaeva, Irina & Tolskaya, Maria. 2001. A grammar of Udihe. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
45. Newman, John. 1996. Give: A Cognitive Linguistic Study. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
46. Peterson, David A. 1998. The morphosyntax of transitivization in Lai (Haka Chin). Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 21(1). 87-153.
47. Peterson, David A. 2007. Applicative constructions: a study of their convergent typologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48. Plank, Frans. 1987. Direkte indirekte Objekte: Was uns lehren lehrt. Leuvense Bijdragen 76. 37-61.
49. Rude, Noel. 1997. Dative shifting and double objects in Sahaptin. In Talmy Givon (ed.), Grammatical Relations: A Functionalist Perspective, 323-349. Amsterdam. Benjamins.
50. Sedlak, Philip A. S. 1975. Direct/indirect object word order: a cross-linguistic analysis. Stanford Working Papers on Language Universals 18. 117-164.
51. Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1996. Applicatives and benefactives: A cognitive account. In Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Grammatical constructions. Their form and meaning, 157-194. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
52. Siewierska, Anna. 1998. Languages with and without objects. Languages in Contrast 1(2). 173-190.
53. Siewierska, Anna. 2003. Person agreement and the determination of alignment. Transactions of the Philological Society 101(2). 339-370.
54. Siewierska, Anna. 2004. Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Siewierska, Anna & Dik Bakker. 2007. Bound person forms in ditransitive clauses revisited. Functions of Language 14(1). 103-125.
56. Siewierska, Anna & Eva van Lier. 2012. Ditransitive constructions with two human non-agentive arguments. Faits de Langues 39. 140-156.
57. Song, Jae Jung. 1996. Causatives and causation: a universal-typological perspective. Longman: London.
58. Taylor, John R. 1998. Double object constructions in Zulu. In John Newman (ed.), The Linguistics of Giving, 67-96. Amsterdam. Benjamins.
59. Thompson, Sandra A., Joseph Sung-Yul Park & Charles N. Lee. 2006. A reference grammar of Wappo. Berkeley: University of California Press.
60. (Available online at http://repositories.cdlib.org/ucpress/)
61. Wali, K. & O. Koul. 1997. Kashmiri: a cognitive-descriptive grammar. London: Routledge.