Ovarian cancer in the United States: Contemporary patterns of care associated with improved survival

Gynecologic Oncology

Volumn 136, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 11-17

  Cliby, William A ^a   Powell, Matthew A ^b   Al Hammadi, Noor ^c   Chen, Ling ^c   Miller, J Philip ^c   Roland, Phillip Y ^d   Mutch, David G ^b   Bristow, Robert E ^e  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b Departments of Obstetrics   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer center; Care patterns; Ovarian cancer; Survival; United states; Volume

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER CENTER; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER GRADING; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; CENTRALIZATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMMUNITY CARE; COMORBIDITY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OVARY CANCER; OVARY CARCINOMA; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; UNITED STATES; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; OVARIAN NEOPLASMS; PATHOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

AGED; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; OVARIAN NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84925227753     PISSN: 00908258     EISSN: 10956859     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.10.023     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2012;62: 10-29.
2. Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Schwartz AG, Qureshi F, Jacques S, Malone J, Munkarah AR. Ovarian cancer: changes in patterns at diagnosis and relative survival over the last three decades. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:1120-7.
3. Morgan Jr RJ, Alvarez RD, Armstrong DK, Burger RA, Castells M, Chen LM, et al. Ovarian cancer, version 3.2012. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2012;10:1339-49.
4. Thrall MM, Gray HJ, Symons RG, Weiss NS, Flum DR, Goff BA. Trends in treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in the Medicare population. Gynecol Oncol 2011; 122:100-6.
5. Goff BA, Matthews BJ, Wynn M, Muntz HG, Lishner DM, Baldwin LM. Ovarian cancer: patterns of surgical care across the United States. Gynecol Oncol 2006;103:383-90.
6. Harlan LC, Clegg LX, Trimble EL. Trends in surgery and chemotherapy for women diagnosed with ovarian cancer in the United States. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:3488-94.
7. Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA 1998;280:1747-51.
8. Derogar M, Sadr-Azodi O, Johar A, Lagergren P, Lagergren J. Hospital and surgeon volume in relation to survival after esophageal cancer surgery in a population-based study. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:551-7.
9. Bristow RE, Palis BE, Chi DS, Cliby WA. The National Cancer Database report on advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: impact of hospital surgical case volume on overall survival and surgical treatment paradigm. Gynecol Oncol 2010;118: 262-7.
10. National Cancer Database. In. Chicago: American College of Surgeons [http://www.facs.org/cancer/ncdb/index.html].
11. Pecorelli S, Benedet JL, Creasman WT, Shepherd JH. FIGO staging of gynecologic cancer. 1994-1997 FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999;65:243-9.
12. Zar J. Biostatistical analysis. 4th ed. Pearson; 1999. p. 929.
13. Kleinbaum D. Survival analysis: a self-learning text. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1996.
14. Cox D. Regression-models and life-tables. J Roy Stat Soc 1972;34:187-220.
15. Partridge EE, Phillips JL, Menck HR. The National Cancer Data Base report on ovarian cancer treatment in United States hospitals. Cancer 1996;78:2236-46.
16. Ioka A, Tsukuma H, Ajiki W, Oshima A. Influence of hospital procedure volume on ovarian cancer survival in Japan, a country with low incidence of ovarian cancer. Cancer Sci 2004;95:233-7.
17. Kumpulainen S, Sankila R, Leminen A, Kuoppala T, Komulainen M, Puistola U, et al. The effect of hospital operative volume, residual tumor and first-line chemotherapy on survival of ovarian cancer - a prospective nation-wide study in Finland. Gynecol Oncol 2009;115:199-203.
18. Paulsen T, Kjaerheim K, Kaern J, Tretli S, Trope C. Improved short-term survival for advanced ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancer patients operated at teaching hospitals. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006;16(Suppl. 1):11-7.
19. Tingulstad S, Skjeldestad FE, Hagen B. The effect of centralization of primary surgery on survival in ovarian cancer patients. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:499-505.
20. du Bois A, Rochon J, Pfisterer J, Hoskins WJ. Variations in institutional infrastructure, physician specialization and experience, and outcome in ovarian cancer: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 2009;112:422-36.
21. Phippen NT, Barnett JC, Lowery WJ, Miller CR, Leath III CA. Surgical outcomes and national comprehensive cancer network compliance in advanced ovarian cancer surgery in a low volume military treatment facility. Gynecol Oncol 2013;131: 158-62.
22. Aune G, Torp SH, Syversen U, Hagen B, Tingulstad S. Ten years' experience with centralized surgery of ovarian cancer in one health region in Norway. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2012;22:226-31.
23. Vernooij F, Heintz AP, Coebergh JW, Massuger LF, Witteveen PO, van der Graaf Y. Specialized and high-volume care leads to better outcomes of ovarian cancer treatment in the Netherlands. Gynecol Oncol 2009;112:455-61.
24. Woo YL, Kyrgiou M, Bryant A, Everett T, Dickinson HO. Centralisation of services for gynaecological cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;3:CD007945.
25. Winchester D, Stewart A, Phillips J, Ward E. The National Cancer Data Base: past, present, and future. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:4-7.
26. Beller U. Editorial. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2012;22:177.