A comparison of open surgery versus endovascular repair of unstable ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

Journal of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 60, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1439-1445

  Gupta, Prateek K ^a   Ramanan, Bala ^b   Engelbert, Travis L ^c   Tefera, Girma ^c   Hoch, John R ^c   Kent, K Craig ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; AGED; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIALYSIS; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; FEMALE; HEART ARREST; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VASCULAR SURGERY; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC RUPTURE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEMODYNAMICS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RISK; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

AGED; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC RUPTURE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODDS RATIO; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; VASCULAR SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 84925227190     PISSN: 07415214     EISSN: 10976809     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.06.122     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Rayt HS, Sutton AJ, London NJ, Sayers RD, Bown MJ. A systematic review and meta-analysis of endovascular repair (EVAR) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008;36:536-44.
2. McPhee J, Eslami MH, Arous EJ, Messina LM, Schanzer A. Endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States (2001-2006): a significant survival benefit over open repair is independently associated with increased institutional volume. J Vasc Surg 2009;49:817-26.
3. Prinssen M, Verhoeven EL, Buth J, Cuypers PW, van Sambeek MR, Balm R, et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1607-18.
4. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;365:2179-86.
5. Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC, Padberg FT Jr, Matsumura JS, Kohler TR, et al. Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial. JAMA 2009;302:1535-42.
6. Reimerink JJ, Hoornweg LL, Vahl AC, Wisselink W, van den Broek TA, Legemate DA, et al. Endovascular repair versus open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2013;258:248-56.
7. Powell JT, Sweeting MJ, Thompson MM, Ashleigh R, Bell R, Gomes M, et al. Endovascular or open repair strategy for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: 30 day outcomes from IMPROVE randomised trial. BMJ 2014;348:f7661.
8. Shiloach M, Frencher SK Jr, Steeger JE, Rowell KS, Bartzokis K, Tomeh MG, et al. Toward robust information: data quality and interrater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 2010;210:6-16.
9. Bilimoria KY, Cohen ME, Ingraham AM, Bentrem DJ, Richards K, Hall BL, et al. Effect of postdischarge morbidity and mortality on comparisons of hospital surgical quality. Ann Surg 2010;252:183-90.
10. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Participant Use Files. Available at: http://www.acsnsqip.org/puf/docs/ACS-NSQIP-Participant-User-Data-File-User-Guide.pdf. Accessed March 1, 2009.
11. Mohan PP, Hamblin MH. Comparison of endovascular and open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in the United States in the Past Decade. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2014;37:337-42.
12. Hinchliffe RJ, Powell JT, Cheshire NJ, Thompson MM. Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a strategy in need of definitive evidence. J Vasc Surg 2009;49:1077-80.
13. Hinchliffe RJ, Bruijstens L, MacSweeney ST, Braithwaite BD. A randomised trial of endovascular and open surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm-results of a pilot study and lessons learned for future studies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006;32:506-13.
14. Giles KA, Pomposelli F, Hamdan A, Wyers M, Jhaveri A, Schermerhorn ML. Decrease in total aneurysm-related deaths in the era of endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2009;49:543-50.
15. Egorova N, Giacovelli J, Greco G, Gelijns A, Kent CK, McKinsey JF. National outcomes for the treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: comparison of open versus endovascular repairs. J Vasc Surg 2008;48:1092-100. 1100.e1-2.
16. Lesperance K, Andersen C, Singh N, Starnes B, Martin MJ. Expanding use of emergency endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: disparities in outcomes from a nationwide perspective. J Vasc Surg 2008;47:1165-70.
17. Vogel TR, Dombrovskiy VY, Haser PB, Graham AM. Has the implementation of EVAR for ruptured AAA improved outcomes? Vasc Endovascular Surg 2009;43:252-7.
18. Veith FJ, Lachat M, Mayer D, Malina M, Holst J, Mehta M, et al. Collected world and single center experience with endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Surg 2009;250:818-24.
19. Nedeau AE, Pomposelli FB, Hamdan AD, Wyers MC, Hsu R, Sachs T, et al. Endovascular vs open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2012;56:15-20.