Judicial review and bureaucratic impact: The future of european union administrative law

Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact: International and Interdisciplinary Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 251-268

  Shapiro, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925211174     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511493782.010     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. R. Stewart, 'The Reformation of American Administrative Law' (1975) 88 Harvard Law Review 1667-813.
2. H. W. R. Wade and C. F. Forsyth, Administrative Law (8th edn, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 855.
3. R. v. Secretary of State for Social Security, ex parte Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants, [1997] 1 WLR 23.
4. R. Kagan, Adversarial Legalism: The AmericanWay of Law (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 2001).
5. S. R. Ackerman, Controlling Environmental Policy: The Limits of Public Law in Germany and the United States (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1995).
6. M. Shapiro and A. Stone Sweet, On Law, Politics and Judicialization (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 228-57.
7. M. Shapiro, 'The Institutionalization of European Administrative Space' in A. Stone Sweet, W. Sandholtz and N. Fligstein (eds.), The Institutionalization of Europe (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002).
8. H. P. Nehl, Principles of Administrative Procedure in EC Law (Oxford, Hart, 1999).
9. Martin Shapiro, Who Guards the Guardians (Athens, GA, University of Georgia Press, 1988).
10. C. Joerges and J. Neyer, 'From Intergovernmental Bargaining to Deliberative Political Processes: The Constitutionalization of Comitology' (1997) 3 European Law Journal 273-99.
11. K. Lenaerts and A. Verhoeven, 'Toward a Legal Framework for Executive Rule-Making in the EU? The Contribution of the New Comitology Decision' (2000) 37 Common Market Law Review 645-86.
12. G. Majone, 'Two Logics of Delegation: Agency and Fiduciary Relations in EU Governance' (2001) 2 European Union Politics 103-37.
13. Metropole Television SA v. Commission [2001] ECR II-1057.
14. R. Katzmann, Institutional Disability: The Saga of Transportation Policy for the Handicapped (Washington, DC, Brookings Institution, 1986).
15. J. Mashaw and D. Harfst, The Struggle for Auto Safety (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1990).
16. S. Mezey, No Longer Disabled: The Federal Courts and the Politics of Social Security Disability (New York, Greenwood Press, 1988).
17. R. Shep Melnick, Regulation and the Courts: The Case of the Clean Air Act (Washington, DC, Brookings Institution, 1983).
18. R. Shep Melnick, Between the Lines InterpretingWelfare Rights (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, 1994).
19. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 435 US 519 (1978).
20. Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 US 837 (1984).
21. J. Mashaw, 'Small Things Like Reasons Are Put in a Jar: Reason and Legitimacy in the Administrative State' (2001) 70 Fordham Law Review 17-35.
22. T. Merrill and K. Hickman, 'Chevron's Domain' (2001) 89 Georgetown Law Journal 833-87.
23. J. L. Smith and E. Tiller, 'The Strategy of Judging: Evidence from Administrative Law' (2002) 31 Journal of Legal Studies 61.