Downwind particulate matters: Regulatory implications of secondary aerosol formation from the interaction of nitrogen oxides and tree emissions

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 50, Issue , 2015, Pages 180-190

  Fry, Juliane L ^a   Koski, Chris ^a   Bott, Kristin ^a   Hsu Flanders, Raphaela ^a   Hazell, Marisa ^a  

^a REED COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Air quality regulation; Monoterpenes; Nitrogen oxides; Particulate matter; Power plants

Indexed keywords

3 CARENE; BETA PINENE; LIMONENE; NITROGEN OXIDE; PINENE; SABINENE; SULFATE; TERPENE; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND;

AEROSOL; AIR QUALITY; AMBIENT AIR; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC POWER PLANT; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PARTICULATE MATTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SECONDARY ORGANIC AEROSOL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84925198121     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: 18736416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.02.017     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Anderson C. Siting gas-fired power plants. Power Eng. 2011, 115(11):132-140.
2. Arneth A., et al. Clean the air, heat the planet?. Science 2009, 326(5953):672-673.
3. 2 from OMI. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2007, 7(8):2103-2118.
4. Brown S.S., et al. Budgets for nocturnal VOC oxidation by nitrate radicals aloft during the 2006 Texas Air Quality Study. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 2011, 116(D24):D24305.
5. Brunekreef B., Forsberg B. Epidemiological evidence of effects of coarse airborne particles on health. Eur. Respir. J. 2005, 26(2):309-318.
6. Cabada J.C., Pandis S.N., Robinson A.L. Sources of atmospheric carbonaceous particulate matter in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2002, 52(6):732-741.
7. Calvert J.G., et al. Mechanisms of the Atmospheric Oxidation of the Alkenes 2000, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
8. Carlton A.G., Wiedinmyer C., Kroll J.H. A review of Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) formation from isoprene. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2009, 9(14):4987-5005.
9. Commission for Environmental Cooperation North American Power Plant Air Emissions 2011, Available from: http://www3.cec.org/islandora/en/item/10236-north-american-power-plant-air-emissions.
10. Davidson C.I., Phalen R.F., Solomon P.A. Airborne particulate matter and human health: a review. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2005, 39(8):737-749.
11. Dwyer J.P. The practice of federalism under the Clean Air Act. Md. Law Rev. 1995, 54:1183.
12. Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Outlook 2014 with Projections to 2040 2014, Department of Energy, Washington DC.
13. Engel-Cox J., et al. Toward the next generation of air quality monitoring: particulate matter. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 80:584-590.
14. EPA, U. Regional Haze Regulations, Final Rule, Washington, DC 1999, 40. CFR Part 51.
15. EPA, U. Rule to Reduce Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone (Clean Air Interstate Rule), Washington, DC 2005, 40. CFR Parts 51, 72, 73, 74, 77, 78 and 96.
16. Environmental Protection Agency National Emissions Inventory, Washington, DC 2013.
17. Environmental Protection Agency. PM2.5 Inventory Resource Center. June 19, 2014; Available from: . http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/pm25inventory/index.html.
18. 3 oxidation of biogenic hydrocarbons. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48(20):11944-11953.
19. Geron C., et al. A review and synthesis of monoterpene speciation from forests in the United States. Atmos. Environ. 2000, 34(11):1761-1781.
20. Goldstein A.H., Galbally I.E. Known and unexplored organic constituents in the earth's atmosphere. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 1515-1521.
21. Grantz D.A., Garner J.H.B., Johnson D.W. Ecological effects of particulate matter. Environ. Int. 2003, 29(2-3):213-239.
22. Hallquist M., et al. The formation, properties and impact of secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2009, 9(14):5155-5236.
23. Hallquist M., et al. The formation, properties and impact of secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2009, 9:5155-5235.
24. Harrison R.M., Yin J. Particulate matter in the atmosphere: which particle properties are important for its effects on health?. Sci. Total Environ. 2000, 249(1-3):85-101.
25. IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2013, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA. T.F. Stocker (Ed.).
26. Konisky D.M., Woods N.D. Exporting air pollution? Regulatory enforcement and environmental free riding in the United States. Polit. Res. Q. 2010, 63(4):771-782.
27. Levy J.I., Hanna S.R. Spatial and temporal variability in urban fine particulate matter concentrations. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159(8-9):2009-2015.
28. Levy J.I., et al. A meta-analysis and multisite time-series analysis of the differential toxicity of major fine particulate matter constituents. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2012, 175(11):1091-1099.
29. McMurry P.H., Shepherd M.F., Vickery J.S. Particulate Matter Science for Policy Makers: A NARSTO Assessment 2004, Cambridge University Press.
30. Nowak D., Dwyer J. Understanding the benefits and costs of urban forest ecosystems. Urban and Community Forestry in the Northeast 2007, 25-46. Springer, Netherlands. J. Kuser (Ed.).
31. Oren C.N. Is the Clean Air Act at a crossroads. Environ. Law 2010, 40(4):1231-1260.
32. Park R.J., et al. Sources of carbonaceous aerosols over the United States and implications for natural visibility. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 2003, 108(D12):4355.
33. Park R.J., et al. Regional visibility statistics in the United States: natural and transboundary pollution influences, and implications for the regional haze rule. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40(28):5405-5423.
34. Patton V., Polkowsky B. The EPA's regional haze proposal: protecting visibility in national parks and wilderness areas. Tulane Environ. Law J. 1997, 11:299.
35. Plantinga A.J., Mauldin T., Miller D.J. An econometric analysis of the costs of sequestering carbon in forests. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1999, 81(4):812-824.
36. Pope C.A., Dockery D.W. Critical review: health effects of fine particulate air pollution: lines that connect. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2006, 6.(56).
37. Pope C.A., et al. Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. JAMA 2002, 287(9):1132-1141.
38. Pope C.A., Ezzati M., Dockery D.W. Fine-particulate air pollution and life expectancy in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360(4):376-386.
39. Popp D. Pollution control innovations and the Clean Air Act of 1990. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 2003, 22(4):641-660.
40. Pulford I., Watson C. Phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated land by trees-a review. Environ. Int. 2003, 29(4):529-540.
41. Pye H.O.T., et al. Global modeling of organic aerosol: the importance of reactive nitrogen. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Disscuss. 2010, 10:21259-21301.
42. Rao M., et al. Assessing the relationship among urban trees, nitrogen dioxide, and respiratory health. Environ. Pollut. 2014, 194(0):96-104.
43. Rappoport D.M., Cooney J.F. Visibility at the Grand Canyon: regulatory negotiations under the Clean Air Act. Ariz. State Law J. 1992, 24:627.
44. Reitze A.W. Air quality protection using state implementation plans - thirty-seven years of increasing complexity. Villanova Environ. Law J. 2004, 15:209.
45. Russell A.G., Brunekreef B. A focus on particulate matter and health. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43(13):4620-4625.
46. 2 observations over the United States: effects of emission control technology and the economic recession. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2012, 12(24):12197-12209.
47. Samet J.M., et al. Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in 20 US cities, 1987-1994. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000, 343(24):1742-1749.
48. Spracklen D.V., et al. Aerosol mass spectrometer constraint on the global secondary organic aerosol budget. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011, 11(23):12109-12136.
49. Thomas Ledig F., Kitzmiller J.H. Genetic strategies for reforestation in the face of global climate change. Forest Ecol. Manag. 1992, 50(1-2):153-169.
50. Van Aken B. Transgenic plants for phytoremediation: helping nature to clean up environmental pollution. Trends Biotechnol. 2008, 26(5):225-227.
51. x and life cycle GHG emissions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46(18):9838-9845.
52. Wei Y., et al. PM2.5 constituents and oxidative DNA damage in humans. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43(13):4757-4762.
53. Winberry W. Resources of ambient air quality data from EPA's ambient air monitoring networks. Air Qual. Clim. Change 2011, 45(4):15.
54. Wood B.D. Modeling federal implementation as a system: the clean air case. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 1992, 36(1):40-67.
55. Woods N.D. Primacy implementation of environmental policy in the U.S. States. Publius: J. Fed. 2006, 36(2):259-276.