Mammogram classification using two dimensional discrete wavelet transform and gray-level co-occurrence matrix for detection of breast cancer

Neurocomputing

Volumn 154, Issue , 2015, Pages 1-14

  Beura, Shradhananda ^a   Majhi, Banshidhar ^a   Dash, Ratnakar ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Confusion matrix; DWT; GLCM; Mammogram; Null hypothesis; ROI

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DATABASE SYSTEMS; DISCRETE WAVELET TRANSFORMS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MAMMOGRAPHY; SIGNAL RECONSTRUCTION; X RAY SCREENS;

CONFUSION MATRICES; GLCM; GRAY LEVEL CO-OCCURRENCE MATRIX; MAMMOGRAM; NULL HYPOTHESIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS; THE REGION OF INTEREST (ROI); TWO-DIMENSIONAL DISCRETE WAVELET TRANSFORM;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BACK PROPAGATION; BACK PROPAGATION NEURAL NETWORK; BREAST CANCER; CLASSIFICATION; CLASSIFIER; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; GRAY LEVEL COOCCURRENCE MATRIX; MAMMOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL PHENOMENA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; TWO DIMENSIONAL DISCRETE WAVELET TRANSFORM;

EID: 84925186884     PISSN: 09252312     EISSN: 18728286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2014.12.032     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Globocan Project 2012, International Agency for Research on Cancer (iarc), World Health Organisation: cancer fact sheets, URL: 2012. http://globocan.iarc.fr.
2. Tabar L., Dean P. Mammography and breast cancer. the new era. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2003, 82(3):319-326.
3. Cheng H., Shi X., Min R., Hu L., Cai X., Du H. Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms. Pattern Recognit. 2006, 39(4):646-668.
4. Dhawan et al A. Analysis of mammographic microcalcifications using grey-level image structure features. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 1996, 15(3):246-259.
5. Wei D., Chan H.-P., Petrick N., Sahiner B., Helvie M.A., Adler D.D., Goodsitt M.M. False-positive reduction technique for detection of masses on digital mammograms. global and local multiresolution texture analysis. Med. Phys. 1997, 24(6):903-914.
6. Liu S., Babbs C.F., Delp E.J. Multiresolution detection of spiculated lesions in digital mammograms. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2001, 10(6):874-884.
7. Rashed E.A., Ismail I.A., Zaki S.I. Multiresolution mammogram analysis in multilevel decomposition. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 2007, 28(2):286-292.
8. Prathibha B., Sadasivam V. Breast tissue characterization using variants of nearest neighbour classifier in multi texture domain. IE (I) J. 2010, 91:7-13.
9. Buciu I., Gacsadi A. Directional features for automatic tumor classification of mammogram images. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 2011, 6(4):370-378.
10. Gorgel P., Sertbaş A., Kilic N., Osman O., et al. Mammographic mass classification using wavelet based support vector machine. IU-J. Electr. Electron. Eng. 2012, 9(1):867-875.
11. Görgel P., Sertbas A., Ucan O.N. Mammographical mass detection and classification using local seed region growing-spherical wavelet transform (lsrg-swt) hybrid scheme. Comput. Biol. Med. 2013, 43(6):765-774.
12. A.S. Kurani, D.-H. Xu, J. Furst, D.S. Raicu, Co-occurrence matrices for volumetric data, in: 7th IASTED International Conference on Computer Graphics and Imaging, Kauai, USA, 2004, pp. 447-452.
13. R.M. Haralick, K. Shanmugam, I.H. Dinstein, Textural features for image classification, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. (6) (1973) 610-621.
14. F. Albregtsen, et al., Statistical texture measures computed from gray level cooccurrence matrices, Image Processing Laboratory, Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, vol. 20, 1995, pp. 1-14.
15. Chan H.-P., Sahiner B., Lam K.L., Petrick N., Helvie M.A., Goodsitt M.M., Adler D.D. Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces. Med. Phys. 1998, 25:2007-2019.
16. Al Mutaz M.A., Dress S., Zaki N. Detection of masses in digital mammogram using second order statistics and artificial neural network. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. 2011, 3(3):176-186.
17. Jona J., Nagaveni N. A hybrid swarm optimization approach for feature set reduction in digital mammograms. WSEAS Trans. Inf. Sci. Appl. 2012, 9:340-349.
18. Suckling J., et al. The mammographic image analysis society digital mammogram database. Exerpta Medica. International Congress Series 1994, 1069:375-378.
19. T.M. Deserno, M. Soiron, J.E. de Oliveira, Texture patterns extracted from digitizes mammograms of different BI-RADS classes, Image Retrieval in Medical Applications Project, release: V1.0 , 2012, URL: http://ganymed.imib.rwth-aachen.de/irma/datasets_en.php.
20. Gonzalez C., Woods E. Digital Image Processing 2011, Pearson, New Delhi, India.
21. Mallat S. A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing 1999, Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
22. Kohavi R., Provost F. Glossary of terms. Mach. Learn. 1998, 30(2-3):271-274.
23. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 2001, 45(1):5-32.